Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Trayvon didn't go home which he could have easily done and/or called the police. His limited intellect and violent impulse turned him around, stalk and attack the "creepy ass cracker".Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.
The trial and jury verdict only prove that the jury found him not guilty based on their opinions of the evidence. He was never proven innocent. If the tables were turned and a black man hunted down and killed a white boy, your opinion would be just the opposite.We don't have just his word we have a TRIAL and the VERDICT of a Jury that believed him and so ruled.Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.The court deemed out self defense. Anybody would get away with killing somebody in self defense.The difference is, this guy has actually killed someone and gotten away with it. In his dim witted little mind, he's been given a license to kill.The difference is, this guy has actually killed someone.
That's why his threatening to kill someone in a road rage incident - AND following him to his place of work- should be taken a lot more seriously.
The system had the chance to lock him up after the Trayvon thing. It didn't.
So either he will kill someone else, or someone will kill him in self-defense. Or maybe some brothers on the street might recognize him and hilarity will ensue.
Esmeralda is trying to say his actions sense means he wasn't defending himself. Even if he is a Scum bag the courts can't try him for murder again.Trayvon didn't go home which he could have easily done and/or called the police. His limited intellect and violent impulse turned him around, stalk and attack the "creepy ass cracker".Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.
No theory about it. For all the whining, this was an open-and-shut case from the get go.
I know what Esmeralda's doing. She is trying to drive a wedge between racial communities. That's what race pimps do.The trial and jury verdict only prove that the jury found him not guilty based on their opinions of the evidence. He was never proven innocent. If the tables were turned and a black man hunted down and killed a white boy, your opinion would be just the opposite.We don't have just his word we have a TRIAL and the VERDICT of a Jury that believed him and so ruled.Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.The court deemed out self defense. Anybody would get away with killing somebody in self defense.The difference is, this guy has actually killed someone and gotten away with it. In his dim witted little mind, he's been given a license to kill.Esmeralda is trying to say his actions sense means he wasn't defending himself. Even if he is a Scum bag the courts can't try him for murder again.Trayvon didn't go home which he could have easily done and/or called the police. His limited intellect and violent impulse turned him around, stalk and attack the "creepy ass cracker".Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.
No theory about it. For all the whining, this was an open-and-shut case from the get go.
Meh, murder is murder and I think most people see it that way.I know what Esmeralda's doing. She is trying to drive a wedge between racial communities. That's what race pimps do.The trial and jury verdict only prove that the jury found him not guilty based on their opinions of the evidence. He was never proven innocent. If the tables were turned and a black man hunted down and killed a white boy, your opinion would be just the opposite.We don't have just his word we have a TRIAL and the VERDICT of a Jury that believed him and so ruled.Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.The court deemed out self defense. Anybody would get away with killing somebody in self defense.Esmeralda is trying to say his actions sense means he wasn't defending himself. Even if he is a Scum bag the courts can't try him for murder again.Trayvon didn't go home which he could have easily done and/or called the police. His limited intellect and violent impulse turned him around, stalk and attack the "creepy ass cracker".Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.
No theory about it. For all the whining, this was an open-and-shut case from the get go.
"Murder is murder" is a tautology and thus doubtlessly true. What happened to Martin was not murder according the doctrine of self defense and most people agree. After the trial, only hard-core race pimps and the ignorant were still calling it murder.Meh, murder is murder and I think most people see it that way.
They can try him for another murder, which he may very well do, given his behavior and personality.The trial and jury verdict only prove that the jury found him not guilty based on their opinions of the evidence. He was never proven innocent. If the tables were turned and a black man hunted down and killed a white boy, your opinion would be just the opposite.We don't have just his word we have a TRIAL and the VERDICT of a Jury that believed him and so ruled.Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.The court deemed out self defense. Anybody would get away with killing somebody in self defense.The difference is, this guy has actually killed someone and gotten away with it. In his dim witted little mind, he's been given a license to kill.Esmeralda is trying to say his actions sense means he wasn't defending himself. Even if he is a Scum bag the courts can't try him for murder again.Trayvon didn't go home which he could have easily done and/or called the police. His limited intellect and violent impulse turned him around, stalk and attack the "creepy ass cracker".Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.
No theory about it. For all the whining, this was an open-and-shut case from the get go.
LOL It hasn't been the end of the story sense the end of the trial. That's what this thread is about. Over and over again this guy creates situations where he is threatening other people with death, at gun point. He's a murder waiting to happen. Let's just hope this time he's the one who ends up dead or in prison before he kills someone else.There is no question, a Jury determined he acted in self defense. End of story.He killed someone, that is a fact. Whether he did it in self defense or not is the question. The evidence does not support self defense on his part any more than it supports self defense on Travyon's part. The jury chose to believe one thing. The verdict is controversial, as it should be. Zimmerman has proven, since the trial, to be a man who is trigger happy. That in itself is evidence that the killing of Martin was not justified. All indications are that Zimmerman will kill again, and part of that concept is based on the fact he already killed someone and did not suffer any legal penalty for it. I believe that in his mind, he has a license to kill. Why does he believe that? Because he is a trigger happy dimwit.Can you prove his guilt?Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.The court deemed out self defense. Anybody would get away with killing somebody in self defense.The difference is, this guy has actually killed someone and gotten away with it. In his dim witted little mind, he's been given a license to kill.
You hate guns we get it.They can try him for another murder, which he may very well do, given his behavior and personality.The trial and jury verdict only prove that the jury found him not guilty based on their opinions of the evidence. He was never proven innocent. If the tables were turned and a black man hunted down and killed a white boy, your opinion would be just the opposite.We don't have just his word we have a TRIAL and the VERDICT of a Jury that believed him and so ruled.Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.The court deemed out self defense. Anybody would get away with killing somebody in self defense.Esmeralda is trying to say his actions sense means he wasn't defending himself. Even if he is a Scum bag the courts can't try him for murder again.Trayvon didn't go home which he could have easily done and/or called the police. His limited intellect and violent impulse turned him around, stalk and attack the "creepy ass cracker".Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.
No theory about it. For all the whining, this was an open-and-shut case from the get go.
How many blacks killed other blacks last weekend? Oh, that is right. Liberals do not care.
What a stupid comment.You hate guns we get it.They can try him for another murder, which he may very well do, given his behavior and personality.The trial and jury verdict only prove that the jury found him not guilty based on their opinions of the evidence. He was never proven innocent. If the tables were turned and a black man hunted down and killed a white boy, your opinion would be just the opposite.We don't have just his word we have a TRIAL and the VERDICT of a Jury that believed him and so ruled.Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.Esmeralda is trying to say his actions sense means he wasn't defending himself. Even if he is a Scum bag the courts can't try him for murder again.Trayvon didn't go home which he could have easily done and/or called the police. His limited intellect and violent impulse turned him around, stalk and attack the "creepy ass cracker".Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.
No theory about it. For all the whining, this was an open-and-shut case from the get go.
You still haven't figured out that there is sometimes a difference between murder and homicide.No Murder was committed you retard.
Oh so he died from natural causes then?
Seriously, you're in JoeB territory.
62% of those found to be innocent through DNA testing by 'The Innocence Project' have been African American.How many blacks killed other blacks last weekend? Oh, that is right. Liberals do not care.
Those blacks, if caught by police, will be arrested, tried, and imprisoned for killing people. They will not be given a pat on the back and sent home, which is what the system did with Zimmerman.
The system cannot lock him away, he committed no crime.The system had the chance to lock him up after the Trayvon thing. It didn't.
So either he will kill someone else, or someone will kill him in self-defense. Or maybe some brothers on the street might recognize him and hilarity will ensue.
You find thuggery hilarious? That's rather sick.
62% of those found to be innocent through DNA testing by 'The Innocence Project' have been African American.How many blacks killed other blacks last weekend? Oh, that is right. Liberals do not care.
Those blacks, if caught by police, will be arrested, tried, and imprisoned for killing people. They will not be given a pat on the back and sent home, which is what the system did with Zimmerman.
The fact is a black man in this country is far more likely to be accused and found guilty of a crime than a white man. And far more of them are not actually guilty of the crime for which they are arrested and convicted. So the statistic that blacks commit so much more crime than whites is not accurate. Too many black men are in prison for crimes they did not commit.
Races of the 317 exonerees:
199 African Americans
94 Caucasians
22 Latinos
2 Asian American
The trial and jury verdict only prove that the jury found him not guilty based on their opinions of the evidence. He was never proven innocent. If the tables were turned and a black man hunted down and killed a white boy, your opinion would be just the opposite.We don't have just his word we have a TRIAL and the VERDICT of a Jury that believed him and so ruled.Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.The court deemed out self defense. Anybody would get away with killing somebody in self defense.The difference is, this guy has actually killed someone and gotten away with it. In his dim witted little mind, he's been given a license to kill.Esmeralda is trying to say his actions sense means he wasn't defending himself. Even if he is a Scum bag the courts can't try him for murder again.Trayvon didn't go home which he could have easily done and/or called the police. His limited intellect and violent impulse turned him around, stalk and attack the "creepy ass cracker".Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.
No theory about it. For all the whining, this was an open-and-shut case from the get go.
Being a dick to your wife and road rage equals murderer?They can try him for another murder, which he may very well do, given his behavior and personality.The trial and jury verdict only prove that the jury found him not guilty based on their opinions of the evidence. He was never proven innocent. If the tables were turned and a black man hunted down and killed a white boy, your opinion would be just the opposite.We don't have just his word we have a TRIAL and the VERDICT of a Jury that believed him and so ruled.Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.The court deemed out self defense. Anybody would get away with killing somebody in self defense.Esmeralda is trying to say his actions sense means he wasn't defending himself. Even if he is a Scum bag the courts can't try him for murder again.Trayvon didn't go home which he could have easily done and/or called the police. His limited intellect and violent impulse turned him around, stalk and attack the "creepy ass cracker".Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.
No theory about it. For all the whining, this was an open-and-shut case from the get go.
Hi way too interested in my sex life to claim you are straight, no shit. I know Zimmerman didn't murder anybody. He was it was deemed self defense by police on the scene then by the court.The trial and jury verdict only prove that the jury found him not guilty based on their opinions of the evidence. He was never proven innocent. If the tables were turned and a black man hunted down and killed a white boy, your opinion would be just the opposite.We don't have just his word we have a TRIAL and the VERDICT of a Jury that believed him and so ruled.Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.The court deemed out self defense. Anybody would get away with killing somebody in self defense.Esmeralda is trying to say his actions sense means he wasn't defending himself. Even if he is a Scum bag the courts can't try him for murder again.Trayvon didn't go home which he could have easily done and/or called the police. His limited intellect and violent impulse turned him around, stalk and attack the "creepy ass cracker".Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.
No theory about it. For all the whining, this was an open-and-shut case from the get go.
Hi faggot.
Murder is not murder when a thug is on top of you beating you down.
That is called self defense. Those are the facts. Now, go cry to your little boyfriend and have him pat you on your dandy head as you grind your teeth about how much you hate truth.
[
Being a dick to your wife and road rage equals murderer?
Good luck convincing a jury.
If/when he does murder somebody, than he will likely be convicted.
If you have proof he is guilty, why didn't you inform the prosecution?The system cannot lock him away, he committed no crime.The system had the chance to lock him up after the Trayvon thing. It didn't.
So either he will kill someone else, or someone will kill him in self-defense. Or maybe some brothers on the street might recognize him and hilarity will ensue.
You find thuggery hilarious? That's rather sick.
They couldn't lock him away because the Police didn't do their jobs. They didn't drug test him on the spot to see what he was under the influence of. They didn't do forenenics on the crime scene. IN fact, they didn't do anything near an investigation until months after the fact.
But what is becoming really obvious after his THIRD run in with the police since the murder, is that this guy is a time bomb waiting to go off.
You shouldn't, you can't lock somebody up if the prosecution couldn't prove guilt.[
Being a dick to your wife and road rage equals murderer?
Good luck convincing a jury.
If/when he does murder somebody, than he will likely be convicted.
When he does murder someone, we are going to wonder why we didn't lock him up the FIRST time he killed someone.
