ConzHateUSA
Rookie
- Jul 10, 2012
- 1,728
- 109
- 0
- Banned
- #241
Check: almost too many racists here to study, just pick two
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trayvon Martin was nothing but a low life thug and the world is better off that he's dead. All the victims that Martin never got to owe thanks to George Zimmerman.
Did the people Martin stole the jewelry from ever get it back?
Link to your "facts" that Trayvon was "stalked" and not followed.
Thankies.
followed is stalked.
If you are walking alone at night and are followed by someone who means you no good and you are doing NOTHING wrong you are being stalked.
I guess people like you think black children are never stalked?
Followed is not stalked...
Stalking can be defined as the willful and repeated following, watching and/or harassing of another person. Unlike other crimes, which usually involve one act, stalking is a series of actions that occur over a period of time. Although stalking is illegal, some of the actions that can contribute to stalking are initially legal, such as gathering information, calling someone on the phone, sending gifts, emailing or instant messaging. They become illegal when they breach the legal definition of harassment e.g. an action such as sending a text is not usually illegal, but is illegal when frequently repeated to an unwilling recipient
Stalking - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Now, let's hear your proof that Zimmerman repeatedly followed Trayvon.
but it is bigotry to decide that someone who hunted down an unarmed black kid who wasn't doing anything wrong should somehow not be prosecuted and have a jury decide whether or not he's a murderer.
Why do you have to qualify that by race? If GZ had been a black man would he have been a racist for killing a black 'kid'? And yet by the laws that once determined such things, GZ would have been a black man.
And does one have to be armed to be a lethal threat? Have you not heard about cases where people get stomped to death, or choked to death or beaten to death? Hpw badly must an armed person get beaten before they are justified in shooting the thug that is merciilessly beating them?
And what if Martin was going for GZ's gun? He wouldnt have been armed at the time of death, true, but then that would have been the point of shooting him so he WOULDNT get armed with GZ gun and kill him.
If someone has you on the ground and beating the absolute hell out of you to the point that you think that you may die OR if that person sees your gun and then goes for it saying that you are going to now die, dont you think that justifies using lethal force to stop them?
If you dont then I dont think we are from the same frigging universe. lol
Let me see here...isn't this a slanderous ALLEGATION that has not been confirmed by facts what so ever? What's next, Zimmerman was seen by an eyewitness on the grassy knoll in Dealey Plaza on Nov, 22 1963 with a rifle? Please. The woman making these allegations needs help...it seems obvious.