NightFox
Wildling
Would you like to debate one on one with any issue you don't agree with me on?
Why so I can read your pre-programmed partisan responses? no thanks, I already know what they all are.
Democrats good! Republicans bad!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Would you like to debate one on one with any issue you don't agree with me on?
ask what she thinks of this?
How about
Do you believe there is a right wing conspiracy out to get you?
Fired Benghazi investigator says House probe is partisan
In a draft of his legal complaint, the Air Force Reserve major says he was unlawfully fired
He says he sought to conduct a comprehensive probe instead of focusing on Hillary Rodham Clinton
He describes himself as a Republican planning to vote for the GOP presidential nominee
Read more here: Fired Benghazi investigator says House probe is partisan
You can ignore the first two minutes, if you want, but check the 2:04 mark
shit....forgot the link...
What does Dennis fucking Hastert have to do with anything?...Now that's it's been revealed that ex-speaker of the House, Dennis Hastert gave hush money to a man he had sex with as a high school coach, why do you suppose republicans still cling to the "Hastert Rule"??
What We Know About the Dennis Hastert Scandal
so Hillary, youve probably seen Monica's Vagina by now, so on a scale of 5 to 10,,,how would you rate it?So Hillary.....when was your first lesbian experience?
Any questions on
Ex-staffer: Benghazi committee pursuing 'partisan investigation' targeting Hillary Clinton By Jake Tapper and Jeremy Diamond, CNN
Maj. Bradley Podliska, an intelligence officer in the Air Force Reserve who describes himself as a conservative Republican, told CNN that the committee trained its sights almost exclusively on Clinton after the revelation last March that she used a private email server during her tenure as secretary of state. That new focus flipped a broad-based probe of the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi on September 11, 2012, into what Podliska described as "a partisan investigation."
Miss Hillary, has anyone ever told you that you look great in bright orange?Any questions on
Ex-staffer: Benghazi committee pursuing 'partisan investigation' targeting Hillary Clinton By Jake Tapper and Jeremy Diamond, CNN
Maj. Bradley Podliska, an intelligence officer in the Air Force Reserve who describes himself as a conservative Republican, told CNN that the committee trained its sights almost exclusively on Clinton after the revelation last March that she used a private email server during her tenure as secretary of state. That new focus flipped a broad-based probe of the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi on September 11, 2012, into what Podliska described as "a partisan investigation."
I would hope so, she was Secretary of State. That is a MAJOR security breach. China and Russia had full access to classified and secret documents.
As a hack, you seek to minimize this, but it is a HUGE issue. Clinton broke dozens of laws and exposed the nation through her negligence and malfeasance.
All because she is a crook and wanted to hide what she's doing.
My question then is; "Madam Hillary, why shouldn't you go to prison for this, as any commoner or Republican would?"
What does Dennis fucking Hastert have to do with anything?...Now that's it's been revealed that ex-speaker of the House, Dennis Hastert gave hush money to a man he had sex with as a high school coach, why do you suppose republicans still cling to the "Hastert Rule"??
What We Know About the Dennis Hastert Scandal
If you're going to attempt to deflect the thread away from the issue at hand, try being a little more subtle
Any questions on
Ex-staffer: Benghazi committee pursuing 'partisan investigation' targeting Hillary Clinton By Jake Tapper and Jeremy Diamond, CNN
Maj. Bradley Podliska, an intelligence officer in the Air Force Reserve who describes himself as a conservative Republican, told CNN that the committee trained its sights almost exclusively on Clinton after the revelation last March that she used a private email server during her tenure as secretary of state. That new focus flipped a broad-based probe of the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi on September 11, 2012, into what Podliska described as "a partisan investigation."
I would hope so, she was Secretary of State. That is a MAJOR security breach. China and Russia had full access to classified and secret documents.
As a hack, you seek to minimize this, but it is a HUGE issue. Clinton broke dozens of laws and exposed the nation through her negligence and malfeasance.
All because she is a crook and wanted to hide what she's doing.
My question then is; "Madam Hillary, why shouldn't you go to prison for this, as any commoner or Republican would?"
really Wow!Any questions on
Ex-staffer: Benghazi committee pursuing 'partisan investigation' targeting Hillary Clinton By Jake Tapper and Jeremy Diamond, CNN
Maj. Bradley Podliska, an intelligence officer in the Air Force Reserve who describes himself as a conservative Republican, told CNN that the committee trained its sights almost exclusively on Clinton after the revelation last March that she used a private email server during her tenure as secretary of state. That new focus flipped a broad-based probe of the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi on September 11, 2012, into what Podliska described as "a partisan investigation."
I would hope so, she was Secretary of State. That is a MAJOR security breach. China and Russia had full access to classified and secret documents.
As a hack, you seek to minimize this, but it is a HUGE issue. Clinton broke dozens of laws and exposed the nation through her negligence and malfeasance.
All because she is a crook and wanted to hide what she's doing.
My question then is; "Madam Hillary, why shouldn't you go to prison for this, as any commoner or Republican would?"
Would you like to debate one on one with any issue you don't agree with me on?
Why so I can read your pre-programmed partisan responses? no thanks, I already know what they all are.
Democrats good! Republicans bad!
[
Wait what?
The Hastert rule is what is allowing the "Freedom Caucus" to block Legislation in the house.
You do know that don't you?
Would you like to debate one on one with any issue you don't agree with me on?
Why so I can read your pre-programmed partisan responses? no thanks, I already know what they all are.
Democrats good! Republicans bad!
That depends on your perspective.
Republicans are theocratic, racist, looking to create dynastic rule and bent on creating an American Empire.
Some might view that as good.
Cite the laws.
really Wow!
You're making shit up again
Cite the laws.
I thought you were in I.T.?
Oh, you're just lying because you're a hack - party above all.
http://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/toolkit/pdf/ID317.pdf
You know damned well she broke the law. Even a private company would be breaking the law by not retaining 7 years of researchable (e-discovery) archives. But you're a hack and hold party above all.