You Tube cuts off ad-money to AGW-denier channels

[Crick]

What an impressive crowd you've joined. The anti-vaxxers, QAnon and now, the GW deniers. I think "flat-earthers" is still an applicable term.

Google To Cut Off Ad Money For YouTube Videos That Spread Climate Change Denial

The decision comes amid increased warnings about the threat of global warming ahead of the U.N. climate summit later this month.

www.huffpost.com

 

[TNHarley]

Ummm ok boomer. Enjoy your youtube circle jerk.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

When the facts are on your side, manipulate the historical data, prevent skeptics from publishing
and demonetize them.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

What an impressive crowd you've joined. The anti-vaxxers, QAnon and now, the GW deniers. I think "flat-earthers" is still an applicable term.

Google To Cut Off Ad Money For YouTube Videos That Spread Climate Change Denial

The decision comes amid increased warnings about the threat of global warming ahead of the U.N. climate summit later this month.

www.huffpost.com

AGW, a theory so great you can't allow debate

Yeah, that's science!

Yeah, why do the ice cores show CO2 LAGGING temperature over 450,000 years?

If mankind is adding to CO2 why did a global shutdown have no impact at all on CO2?

 

[Crick]

When the facts are on your side, manipulate the historical data, prevent skeptics from publishing
and demonetize them.

Yes Todd, the facts are on my side. That is because I am on the side with the facts. You are not. You need to think about that a great deal more than you do.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Yes Todd, the facts are on my side. That is because I am on the side with the facts. You are not. You need to think about that a great deal more than you do.

What "facts" are those, that you have 'consensus'?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Yes Todd, the facts are on my side. That is because I am on the side with the facts. You are not. You need to think about that a great deal more than you do.

Obviously.

That's why warmers fight to stop skeptics from publishing.

 

[ding]

What an impressive crowd you've joined. The anti-vaxxers, QAnon and now, the GW deniers. I think "flat-earthers" is still an applicable term.

Google To Cut Off Ad Money For YouTube Videos That Spread Climate Change Denial

The decision comes amid increased warnings about the threat of global warming ahead of the U.N. climate summit later this month.

www.huffpost.com

Scientists come to opposite conclusions about the causes of recent "climate change" depending on which datasets they consider.

I believe a statement from a recent paper which explains how different conclusions were reached would be an appropriate response to your apparent joy over the suppression of scientific investigation .

"...Given the many valid dissenting scientific opinions that remain on these issues, we argue that recent attempts to force an apparent scientific consensus (including the IPCC reports) on these scientific debates are premature and ultimately unhelpful for scientific progress..."


How much has the sun influenced Northern Hemisphere temperature trends? An ongoing debate

What do you think TNHarley ? Do you believe it hurts or helps a cause to shut down discussion? I say it hurts their cause and it's not something that should be celebrated, what say you?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Scientists come to opposite conclusions about the causes of recent "climate change" depending on which datasets they consider.

I believe a statement from a recent paper which explains how different conclusions were reached would be an appropriate response to your apparent joy over the suppression of scientific investigation .

"...Given the many valid dissenting scientific opinions that remain on these issues, we argue that recent attempts to force an apparent scientific consensus (including the IPCC reports) on these scientific debates are premature and ultimately unhelpful for scientific progress..."


How much has the sun influenced Northern Hemisphere temperature trends? An ongoing debate

What do you think TNHarley ? Do you believe it hurts or helps a cause to shut down discussion? I say it hurts their cause and it's not something that should be celebrated, what say you?

It's laughable to think the Sun has any impact on Earth's climate, that's denier talk -- my Crick imitation

 

[TNHarley]

Scientists come to opposite conclusions about the causes of recent "climate change" depending on which datasets they consider.

I believe a statement from a recent paper which explains how different conclusions were reached would be an appropriate response to your apparent joy over the suppression of scientific investigation .

"...Given the many valid dissenting scientific opinions that remain on these issues, we argue that recent attempts to force an apparent scientific consensus (including the IPCC reports) on these scientific debates are premature and ultimately unhelpful for scientific progress..."


How much has the sun influenced Northern Hemisphere temperature trends? An ongoing debate

What do you think TNHarley ? Do you believe it hurts or helps a cause to shut down discussion? I say it hurts their cause and it's not something that should be celebrated, what say you?

Hurts, obviously.
You know its bad when you have groups of people shutting down discussion over SCIENCE. Something that should ALWAYS be discussed.
Of course, this has turned political and thats the biggest problem.
No science is immune to the infection of politics and the corruption of power - Jacob Bronowski

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Hurts, obviously.
You know its bad when you have groups of people shutting down discussion over SCIENCE. Something that should ALWAYS be discussed.
Of course, this has turned political and thats the biggest problem.
No science is immune to the infection of politics and the corruption of power - Jacob Bronowski

We're still experimenting with Relativity, but no AGW experiments, not ever.

Odd thing for science

 

[ding]

It's sad.

 

[TNHarley]

It's sad.

As a species, we still have A LOT of evolving to do. IE we need to grow the fuck up

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It's so odd that with all this imaginary "science" behind them the AGW Cultists have to shut off the debate rather than point out the science that proves their insane Manmade Global Climate Warming Change Theory

 

[Old Rocks]

Scientists come to opposite conclusions about the causes of recent "climate change" depending on which datasets they consider.

I believe a statement from a recent paper which explains how different conclusions were reached would be an appropriate response to your apparent joy over the suppression of scientific investigation .

"...Given the many valid dissenting scientific opinions that remain on these issues, we argue that recent attempts to force an apparent scientific consensus (including the IPCC reports) on these scientific debates are premature and ultimately unhelpful for scientific progress..."


How much has the sun influenced Northern Hemisphere temperature trends? An ongoing debate

What do you think TNHarley ? Do you believe it hurts or helps a cause to shut down discussion? I say it hurts their cause and it's not something that should be celebrated, what say you?

More dumbfuckery from a renowned dumb fuck. Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.

 

[Old Rocks]

Hurts, obviously.
You know its bad when you have groups of people shutting down discussion over SCIENCE. Something that should ALWAYS be discussed.
Of course, this has turned political and thats the biggest problem.
No science is immune to the infection of politics and the corruption of power - Jacob Bronowski

Nobody is shutting down discussion over science. But to discuss science, you had better be bringing evidence to the table. Thus far, the deniers have not done that.

 

[ding]

More dumbfuckery from a renowned dumb fuck. Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.

Scientists come to opposite conclusions about the causes of recent climate change depending on which datasets they consider.

Increased climate fluctuation and environmental uncertainty are artifacts of a bipolar glaciated world where the threshold for extensive northern hemisphere continental glaciation is lower than the threshold for extensive southern hemisphere continental glaciation and our the present temperature is close to the northern hemisphere threshold.

"Mainstream" science has wrongly correlated the recent warming trend with CO2. They have mistaken the increased climate fluctuation and environmental uncertainty of a bipolar glaciated world for man made warming.

The planet is uniquely configured for bipolar glaciation. A configuration which has never existed before in the history of the planet. We are precariously poised for extensive northern hemisphere glaciation. A condition which has led to increased climate fluctuation and environmental uncertainty over the last 2.7 million years. It is that volatility that will be the undoing of "mainstream" science's faulty analysis and conclusion. Within 30 years everything you believe will be proven wrong.

 

[TNHarley]

Nobody is shutting down discussion over science. But to discuss science, you had better be bringing evidence to the table. Thus far, the deniers have not done that.

You have GOT to be kidding me

 

[skookerasbil]

More dumbfuckery from a renowned dumb fuck. Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.

lol......why all the anger? Smacks of somebody who is getting train wrecked in the debate.

 

[skookerasbil]

Nobody is shutting down discussion over science. But to discuss science, you had better be bringing evidence to the table. Thus far, the deniers have not done that.

But the only thing that matters at the end of the day is..........who's not winning? For the past 10 years in this forum, what winning has the green contingent seen? Who cares about the "science" if it is not transcending anywhere beyond the field? A serious question.

The whole science mantra is nothing more than a billboard for the climate obsessed.

Where is all of this translating into any kind of action? I have the answer.........

Its not