You know what we on the right should do with all these bullshit Carson threads....

[kaz]

Hildabeast dodging sniper fire in a war zone in a pant suit, Obama saying there are 57 states and disrespects Marines everywhere by his pronunciation of "corpse man". Michael Dukakis sits on top of the tank looking like a bobble head.

Dan Quayle misspells "potato" on a chalkboard

What is the difference between all these things??

The difference is scandal management. Take the Dan Quayle scenario. Did any on the left jump up and down and make a spectacle about it? Not really. It was talked about, and the incident has been remembered as a demonstration of a known fact. But it never turned into a big deal. By that point, everyone knew that Quayle was an idiot. There was no real question about it. Nobody tried to turn the molehill into a mountain, and it's remains nothing more than a dim memory of an ultimately irrelevant occurrence.

Contrast that to the 57 states gaff. So much ado over nothing made those who tried to 'champion' the whole thing into a big deal look like idiots. And rightfully so. Obama never believed we have 57 states. Accidentally supplanting "forty" with "fifty" is the type of meaningless mistake that every single one of us has encountered a thousand times in our lifetimes. Whether it's accidentally saying "fifty" when you mean "forty" or saying "eighty" when you mean to say "eighteen" or even the occasional "twen-teen" when you mean to say "twenty." When you try to make mountains out of molehills all you get is your fake mountain crashing down on you.

That brings us to Dukakis on a tank. This was actionable. This was useable. But it had to be done correctly. The right didn't make a grand spectacle and try to cram a conclusion down the public's throat. To the contrary, it was handled with delicacy and sophistication. Bush's campaign used it to create insinuation and suggestion. The hint was picked up, and the public did the rest on their own.

The younger Bush did a very similar thing during the 2000 campaign. One of Bush's campaign platforms was that he would "restore honesty and integrity" to the Presidency. By taking a more delicate and sophisticated approach, he successfully generated public approval for himself, leveraged from disapproval for Clinton, and by association Gore. He gave the public two and two, and they put the 'four' together on their own.

When you come off too strong, you look pathetically weak. When you handle things gently, you look powerful. By trying to present a shallow front of fake strength, Carson has made himself look 10x weaker. By keeping their mouths shut, his opponents (Republican and Democrat alike) are allowing Carson to self destruct. They are biding their time, letting the self destruction come to its own fruition. In allowing that to happen, they are exacting the greatest attack on him they can hope to realize. If they continue to manage this properly, all it will take to provide the final blow will be some light allusions.

With Dan to this day he is demonized, no one's ever forgotten, you don't think he knew how to spell potato? Obama how do you know he did know that there was not 57 states? Why make up excuses for either one of them? Anyway, like it or not the media does play favorites. They just can't tolerate disagreement of themselves...

No...people remember "I knew Jack Kennedy...you, sir, are no Jack Kennedy"

or in your case, I knew Bozo, and you sir, are no Bozo! now Bozo was a clown. You might be Bonzo, you might measure up to a chimp

 

[bodecea]

Vigilante doesn't know whether to shit or go blind. Wait until Trump really pounds on Rain Man Carson.

I think he's started already.

 

[bodecea]

Hildabeast dodging sniper fire in a war zone in a pant suit, Obama saying there are 57 states and disrespects Marines everywhere by his pronunciation of "corpse man". Michael Dukakis sits on top of the tank looking like a bobble head.

Dan Quayle misspells "potato" on a chalkboard

What is the difference between all these things??

The difference is scandal management. Take the Dan Quayle scenario. Did any on the left jump up and down and make a spectacle about it? Not really. It was talked about, and the incident has been remembered as a demonstration of a known fact. But it never turned into a big deal. By that point, everyone knew that Quayle was an idiot. There was no real question about it. Nobody tried to turn the molehill into a mountain, and it's remains nothing more than a dim memory of an ultimately irrelevant occurrence.

Contrast that to the 57 states gaff. So much ado over nothing made those who tried to 'champion' the whole thing into a big deal look like idiots. And rightfully so. Obama never believed we have 57 states. Accidentally supplanting "forty" with "fifty" is the type of meaningless mistake that every single one of us has encountered a thousand times in our lifetimes. Whether it's accidentally saying "fifty" when you mean "forty" or saying "eighty" when you mean to say "eighteen" or even the occasional "twen-teen" when you mean to say "twenty." When you try to make mountains out of molehills all you get is your fake mountain crashing down on you.

That brings us to Dukakis on a tank. This was actionable. This was useable. But it had to be done correctly. The right didn't make a grand spectacle and try to cram a conclusion down the public's throat. To the contrary, it was handled with delicacy and sophistication. Bush's campaign used it to create insinuation and suggestion. The hint was picked up, and the public did the rest on their own.

The younger Bush did a very similar thing during the 2000 campaign. One of Bush's campaign platforms was that he would "restore honesty and integrity" to the Presidency. By taking a more delicate and sophisticated approach, he successfully generated public approval for himself, leveraged from disapproval for Clinton, and by association Gore. He gave the public two and two, and they put the 'four' together on their own.

When you come off too strong, you look pathetically weak. When you handle things gently, you look powerful. By trying to present a shallow front of fake strength, Carson has made himself look 10x weaker. By keeping their mouths shut, his opponents (Republican and Democrat alike) are allowing Carson to self destruct. They are biding their time, letting the self destruction come to its own fruition. In allowing that to happen, they are exacting the greatest attack on him they can hope to realize. If they continue to manage this properly, all it will take to provide the final blow will be some light allusions.

With Dan to this day he is demonized, no one's ever forgotten, you don't think he knew how to spell potato? Obama how do you know he did know that there was not 57 states? Why make up excuses for either one of them? Anyway, like it or not the media does play favorites. They just can't tolerate disagreement of themselves...

No...people remember "I knew Jack Kennedy...you, sir, are no Jack Kennedy"

If jackie's fan club ever knew a plethora of corruption he had in his life, for that matter the whole Kennedy family. Is the very definition of corruption in politics of typical career politicians.

Ok....thanks for that info we already knew.

 

[bodecea]

Hildabeast dodging sniper fire in a war zone in a pant suit, Obama saying there are 57 states and disrespects Marines everywhere by his pronunciation of "corpse man". Michael Dukakis sits on top of the tank looking like a bobble head.

Dan Quayle misspells "potato" on a chalkboard

What is the difference between all these things??

The difference is scandal management. Take the Dan Quayle scenario. Did any on the left jump up and down and make a spectacle about it? Not really. It was talked about, and the incident has been remembered as a demonstration of a known fact. But it never turned into a big deal. By that point, everyone knew that Quayle was an idiot. There was no real question about it. Nobody tried to turn the molehill into a mountain, and it's remains nothing more than a dim memory of an ultimately irrelevant occurrence.

Contrast that to the 57 states gaff. So much ado over nothing made those who tried to 'champion' the whole thing into a big deal look like idiots. And rightfully so. Obama never believed we have 57 states. Accidentally supplanting "forty" with "fifty" is the type of meaningless mistake that every single one of us has encountered a thousand times in our lifetimes. Whether it's accidentally saying "fifty" when you mean "forty" or saying "eighty" when you mean to say "eighteen" or even the occasional "twen-teen" when you mean to say "twenty." When you try to make mountains out of molehills all you get is your fake mountain crashing down on you.

That brings us to Dukakis on a tank. This was actionable. This was useable. But it had to be done correctly. The right didn't make a grand spectacle and try to cram a conclusion down the public's throat. To the contrary, it was handled with delicacy and sophistication. Bush's campaign used it to create insinuation and suggestion. The hint was picked up, and the public did the rest on their own.

The younger Bush did a very similar thing during the 2000 campaign. One of Bush's campaign platforms was that he would "restore honesty and integrity" to the Presidency. By taking a more delicate and sophisticated approach, he successfully generated public approval for himself, leveraged from disapproval for Clinton, and by association Gore. He gave the public two and two, and they put the 'four' together on their own.

When you come off too strong, you look pathetically weak. When you handle things gently, you look powerful. By trying to present a shallow front of fake strength, Carson has made himself look 10x weaker. By keeping their mouths shut, his opponents (Republican and Democrat alike) are allowing Carson to self destruct. They are biding their time, letting the self destruction come to its own fruition. In allowing that to happen, they are exacting the greatest attack on him they can hope to realize. If they continue to manage this properly, all it will take to provide the final blow will be some light allusions.

With Dan to this day he is demonized, no one's ever forgotten, you don't think he knew how to spell potato? Obama how do you know he did know that there was not 57 states? Why make up excuses for either one of them? Anyway, like it or not the media does play favorites. They just can't tolerate disagreement of themselves...

No...people remember "I knew Jack Kennedy...you, sir, are no Jack Kennedy"

or in your case, I knew Bozo, and you sir, are no Bozo! now Bozo was a clown. You might be Bonzo, you might measure up to a chimp

Personal attacks instead of thread content, not entirely unexpected.

 

[kaz]

Hildabeast dodging sniper fire in a war zone in a pant suit, Obama saying there are 57 states and disrespects Marines everywhere by his pronunciation of "corpse man". Michael Dukakis sits on top of the tank looking like a bobble head.

Dan Quayle misspells "potato" on a chalkboard

What is the difference between all these things??

The difference is scandal management. Take the Dan Quayle scenario. Did any on the left jump up and down and make a spectacle about it? Not really. It was talked about, and the incident has been remembered as a demonstration of a known fact. But it never turned into a big deal. By that point, everyone knew that Quayle was an idiot. There was no real question about it. Nobody tried to turn the molehill into a mountain, and it's remains nothing more than a dim memory of an ultimately irrelevant occurrence.

Contrast that to the 57 states gaff. So much ado over nothing made those who tried to 'champion' the whole thing into a big deal look like idiots. And rightfully so. Obama never believed we have 57 states. Accidentally supplanting "forty" with "fifty" is the type of meaningless mistake that every single one of us has encountered a thousand times in our lifetimes. Whether it's accidentally saying "fifty" when you mean "forty" or saying "eighty" when you mean to say "eighteen" or even the occasional "twen-teen" when you mean to say "twenty." When you try to make mountains out of molehills all you get is your fake mountain crashing down on you.

That brings us to Dukakis on a tank. This was actionable. This was useable. But it had to be done correctly. The right didn't make a grand spectacle and try to cram a conclusion down the public's throat. To the contrary, it was handled with delicacy and sophistication. Bush's campaign used it to create insinuation and suggestion. The hint was picked up, and the public did the rest on their own.

The younger Bush did a very similar thing during the 2000 campaign. One of Bush's campaign platforms was that he would "restore honesty and integrity" to the Presidency. By taking a more delicate and sophisticated approach, he successfully generated public approval for himself, leveraged from disapproval for Clinton, and by association Gore. He gave the public two and two, and they put the 'four' together on their own.

When you come off too strong, you look pathetically weak. When you handle things gently, you look powerful. By trying to present a shallow front of fake strength, Carson has made himself look 10x weaker. By keeping their mouths shut, his opponents (Republican and Democrat alike) are allowing Carson to self destruct. They are biding their time, letting the self destruction come to its own fruition. In allowing that to happen, they are exacting the greatest attack on him they can hope to realize. If they continue to manage this properly, all it will take to provide the final blow will be some light allusions.

With Dan to this day he is demonized, no one's ever forgotten, you don't think he knew how to spell potato? Obama how do you know he did know that there was not 57 states? Why make up excuses for either one of them? Anyway, like it or not the media does play favorites. They just can't tolerate disagreement of themselves...

No...people remember "I knew Jack Kennedy...you, sir, are no Jack Kennedy"

or in your case, I knew Bozo, and you sir, are no Bozo! now Bozo was a clown. You might be Bonzo, you might measure up to a chimp

Personal attacks instead of thread content, not entirely unexpected.

You picked up on that, did you? that you are likely to reap what you sow?

 

[Nosmo King]

Just an aside but, doesn't it kinda smell as if the rabid Right Wingers, the hyper-partisans, can dish it out but not take it? They gleefully post every attack, every salvo, every lie an innuendo on this boar do about everyone with a (d) behind their name.

But let a little whiff of doubt and prevarication rise from their front runner for President and they first deflect (predictable for the defenseless) and then whine like clueless little girls.

Watch one of them reply with an 'asshole' emoticon.

 

[kaz]

Just an aside but, doesn't it kinda smell as if the rabid Right Wingers, the hyper-partisans, can dish it out but not take it? They gleefully post every attack, every salvo, every lie an innuendo on this boar do about everyone with a (d) behind their name.

But let a little whiff of doubt and prevarication rise from their front runner for President and they first deflect (predictable for the defenseless) and then whine like clueless little girls.

Watch one of them reply with an 'asshole' emoticon.

So when you people attack Carson lying but can't deal with that you are going to vote for Hillary who is documented to lie all the time, that is us being able to dish it out but now take it.



Um ... yeah ...

 

[kiwiman127]

Let, the little pond scum liberals post all they want about this insignificant shit, as they feel the Hildebeast's SINS are FAR LESS (murder, corruption, Crime family, LIAR!) then the good doctors MIS-REMEMBERES, or his opinion and interpretation of events, we simply DON'T post in them, and let them rant to their hearts content!.... So to you fucking scumbag liberals, just remember we have MANY of these on that bitch you want for president!



Oh, to save face, you 's can all fall back on HER INTERPRETATION of this event!

YOU, of all people crying about insignificant shit! Your history of posting crap from hypernon-partisan blogs that quickly and easily gets exposed for what it is,,, bullshit sans any truth, period!
There's a lot of total crap that is posted on these boards from both sides, but Vagisil, you are the king of carp!

 

[Misty]

It doesn't matter. Everyone has already picked their candidate. None of these threads or articles are going to change anyone's minds.

 

[Misty]

Let, the little pond scum liberals post all they want about this insignificant shit, as they feel the Hildebeast's SINS are FAR LESS (murder, corruption, Crime family, LIAR!) then the good doctors MIS-REMEMBERES, or his opinion and interpretation of events, we simply DON'T post in them, and let them rant to their hearts content!.... So to you fucking scumbag liberals, just remember we have MANY of these on that bitch you want for president!



Oh, to save face, you 's can all fall back on HER INTERPRETATION of this event!

Yes, deflect to Hillary. It's quite expected.

And you will vote for Hillary no matter what is said about her just as I will vote for Carson.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Just an aside but, doesn't it kinda smell as if the rabid Right Wingers, the hyper-partisans, can dish it out but not take it? They gleefully post every attack, every salvo, every lie an innuendo on this boar do about everyone with a (d) behind their name.

But let a little whiff of doubt and prevarication rise from their front runner for President and they first deflect (predictable for the defenseless) and then whine like clueless little girls.

Watch one of them reply with an 'asshole' emoticon.

For the most part we dish facts. You "assholes" dish jerry springer style nonsense. One =/= the other

 

[Arianrhod]

It doesn't matter. Everyone has already picked their candidate. None of these threads or articles are going to change anyone's minds.

Does that mean you'll stop posting your "[______] lied about..." threads?

 

[Nosmo King]

Just an aside but, doesn't it kinda smell as if the rabid Right Wingers, the hyper-partisans, can dish it out but not take it? They gleefully post every attack, every salvo, every lie an innuendo on this boar do about everyone with a (d) behind their name.

But let a little whiff of doubt and prevarication rise from their front runner for President and they first deflect (predictable for the defenseless) and then whine like clueless little girls.

Watch one of them reply with an 'asshole' emoticon.

For the most part we dish facts. You "assholes" dish jerry springer style nonsense. One =/= the other

Let's review these "facts" from the previous decade, shall we?

There are stockpiles of WMD.

Obamacare is a job killer.

QHillary and the State Department lies that Benghazi was not her fault.

The Clintons, the Obamas and anyone with a (d) behind their name are de facto Socialists.

I'm sure my board comrades can provide other Conservative political talking points aren't 'factual' but utter canards.

 

[Rotagilla]

Your boy Trump is calling Carson a liar.

Are you including him among your so-called scumbags?

I call him a politician (see how he's evolved, and taking advantage of a situation)

· "You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before."

Rahm Emanuel
May 26, 2010

 

[washamericom]

Let, the little pond scum liberals post all they want about this insignificant shit, as they feel the Hildebeast's SINS are FAR LESS (murder, corruption, Crime family, LIAR!) then the good doctors MIS-REMEMBERES, or his opinion and interpretation of events, we simply DON'T post in them, and let them rant to their hearts content!.... So to you fucking scumbag liberals, just remember we have MANY of these on that bitch you want for president!



Oh, to save face, you 's can all fall back on HER INTERPRETATION of this event!

Yes, deflect to Hillary. It's quite expected.

Oh, you want MORE Hildebeasty lies....well, why didn't you ask!

this is pretty good. sandy cheese berger in paradise good.
i think sorkin has been writing American history as he goes along, for years.
Berger's response to Sorkin

 

[HenryBHough]

Personal attacks instead of thread content, not entirely unexpected.

Indeed! You have taught us well.

 

[kaz]

Let's review these "facts" from the previous decade, shall we?

Sure

* There are stockpiles of WMD.

- the big lie of the Iraq war was Democrats saying they were lied to

*Obamacare is a job killer.

true

*Hillary and the State Department lies that Benghazi was not her fault.

What? May want to review elementary English on that one, Holmes

*The Clintons, the Obamas and anyone with a (d) behind their name are de facto Socialists.

Nope, they are just socialist, don't know what that even means

*I'm sure my board comrades can provide other Conservative political talking points aren't 'factual' but utter canards.

birds of a feather, you're all full of shit

 

[Vigilante]

• Politico Changes Headline On Carson Story, Pretends It Didn’t
  The Daily Caller ^ | 11/06/2015 | Blake Neff
  Politico has already begun to backtrack its explosive story accusing Ben Carson of lying about an acceptance to West Point, deleting its claim that Carson had confessed to “fabricating” his admission.When�it�first published its story Friday morning, the Virginia-based blog aggressively declared that�Carson had admitted to telling a big lie about his past.“Ben Carson’s campaign on Friday admitted … that a central point in his inspirational personal story was fabricated,” Politico’s story originally said.Just hours later, though, this opening line was removed entirely and Politico’s accusation significantly scaled back. “Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson on Friday conceded that he never applied...