You Can Take The Judge Off The Bench But You Can't Take The Eugenics Out Of The Judge...

[2aguy]

Yes...Ruth Bader Ginsburg...Supreme Court Justice...and believer in eugenics? probably...from what she says in candid moments...after all...aren't a lot of the pro abortion movement anti population...don't they already think we have too many people...and on top of that...too many of the wrong people...supporters of abortion should really be proud of Justice Ginsburg...she isn't afraid to hint at eugenics...

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Really Wants Poor People To Stop Having Babies

 

[Pennywise]

Old bat ought to die soon herself. I'm saying prayers to Allah.

 

[shart_attack]

I always find it tragically ironic when someone who's Jewish champions something that was a philosophical staple of the Third Reich.

 

[Pennywise]

I always find it tragically ironic when someone who's Jewish champions something that was a philosophical staple of the Third Reich.

Everyone believes there's someone that ought not have been born. The irony of Ruthy the whore monger's statement is lost on her, because she thinks she's better than Hitler. See what I did there?

 

[bendog]

I'm going to assume that you either did not, or were incapable of, going to the embedded link the NYT interview with Ginsberg, and READING it, in which case you would have seen that the Federalist article intentionally misconstrued what she said, or the writer was too stupid to comprehend. The bolding is mine, in an effort to help.

Q: The case ties together themes of women’s equality and reproductive freedom. The court split those themes apart in Roe v. Wade. Do you see, as part of a future feminist legal wish list, repositioning Roe so that the right to abortion is rooted in the constitutional promise of sex equality?

JUSTICE GINSBURG: Oh, yes. I think it will be.

Q: If you were a lawyer again, what would you want to accomplish as a future feminist legal agenda?

JUSTICE GINSBURG: Reproductive choice has to be straightened out. There will never be a woman of means without choice anymore. That just seems to me so obvious. The states that had changed their abortion laws before Roe [to make abortion legal] are not going to change back. So we have a policy that affects only poor women, and it can never be otherwise, and I don’t know why this hasn’t been said more often.

Q: Are you talking about the distances women have to travel because in parts of the country, abortion is essentially unavailable, because there are so few doctors and clinics that do the procedure? And also, the lack of Medicaid for abortions for poor women?

JUSTICE GINSBURG: Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. [Harris v. McRae — in 1980 the court upheld the Hyde Amendment, which forbids the use of Medicaid for abortions.] Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong.

Q: When you say that reproductive rights need to be straightened out, what do you mean?

JUSTICE GINSBURG: The basic thing is that the government has no business making that choice for a woman.

Q: Does that mean getting rid of the test the court imposed, in which it allows states to impose restrictions on abortion — like a waiting period — that are not deemed an “undue burden” to a woman’s reproductive freedom?

JUSTICE GINSBURG: I’m not a big fan of these tests. I think the court uses them as a label that accommodates the result it wants to reach. It will be, it should be, that this is a woman’s decision. It’s entirely appropriate to say it has to be an informed decision, but that doesn’t mean you can keep a woman overnight who has traveled a great distance to get to the clinic, so that she has to go to some motel and think it over for 24 hours or 48 hours.

SO to SUMMARIZE

At the time Roe was decided, Medicaid covered abortions for the poor. "Some people" feared that would lead to poor people not having babies. If you were around then, you might recall this was a fear in the Black community that their vote would be "diluted." However, ironically, the Hyde Amendment ruled that Medicaid wouldn't pay, and the result has been in a female happens to become pregnant she WILL ALWAYS HAVE A CHOICE, whereas a poor person will not because of the Hyde Amendment and restrictions such as Texas's recent "efforts." And, Ginsburg did not offer any thought as to eugenics.

And shark attick, you're an anti-Semite sob.