Arkansas Warm! Like Clinton! Like Pryor! Dis-like Cotton(?)!

mascale

Gold Member
Feb 22, 2009
6,836
800
130
The Republicans would now be said to have showcased their brand in at least two Senate races. In Kentucky, no one seems to really like Senator McConnell. Now, low and behold, in Arkansas, no one seems to like the fellow, Cotton(?)

http://www.suffolk.edu/documents/SUPRC/9_24_2014_marginals.pdf

And apparently there are other polls, now favorable to Pryor. Now, with national matters all over the news, and even worldwide, then the Southern comfort zone may actually become affable, again. The Kentucky Democrat for Senate even seems to know how to hold a rifle, not at all like a terrorist(?). The Iowa Republican candidate for Senate, even seems to know. . . well. . . ..a thing or two about terrorism on her own, by comparison(?)!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Lands of Many Nations understand Southern Comfort, even 24/7! Lands of Many Nations even strike matches. . .maybe on statues. . . .of Al Gore(?)!
 
The Republicans would now be said to have showcased their brand in at least two Senate races. In Kentucky, no one seems to really like Senator McConnell. Now, low and behold, in Arkansas, no one seems to like the fellow, Cotton(?)

http://www.suffolk.edu/documents/SUPRC/9_24_2014_marginals.pdf

And apparently there are other polls, now favorable to Pryor. Now, with national matters all over the news, and even worldwide, then the Southern comfort zone may actually become affable, again. The Kentucky Democrat for Senate even seems to know how to hold a rifle, not at all like a terrorist(?). The Iowa Republican candidate for Senate, even seems to know. . . well. . . ..a thing or two about terrorism on her own, by comparison(?)!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Lands of Many Nations understand Southern Comfort, even 24/7! Lands of Many Nations even strike matches. . .maybe on statues. . . .of Al Gore(?)!

That first paragraph you wrote actually made a little sense.

But every paragraph that came after it is a testament to what happens to ADHD patients who don't take their Adderall or Ritalin.
 
The Republicans would now be said to have showcased their brand in at least two Senate races. In Kentucky, no one seems to really like Senator McConnell. Now, low and behold, in Arkansas, no one seems to like the fellow, Cotton(?)

http://www.suffolk.edu/documents/SUPRC/9_24_2014_marginals.pdf

And apparently there are other polls, now favorable to Pryor. Now, with national matters all over the news, and even worldwide, then the Southern comfort zone may actually become affable, again. The Kentucky Democrat for Senate even seems to know how to hold a rifle, not at all like a terrorist(?). The Iowa Republican candidate for Senate, even seems to know. . . well. . . ..a thing or two about terrorism on her own, by comparison(?)!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Lands of Many Nations understand Southern Comfort, even 24/7! Lands of Many Nations even strike matches. . .maybe on statues. . . .of Al Gore(?)!

That first paragraph you wrote actually made a little sense.

But every paragraph that came after it is a testament to what happens to ADHD patients who don't take their Adderall or Ritalin.
Notice the user name and what it is?
 
An internal poll from the Pryor campaign shows Pryor ahead, as expected. The liberal commentary about the poll focuses on the fact that people seem to like Senator Pryor.

Democratic Sen. Mark Pryor Leads By 3 Points In New Arkansas Senate Poll

The concept "liberal" Cotton would not at all be a sound description of why "Cotton," rhymes with, "Loathed(?)." " Hypocrite" and "Shallow," (aka, Ivy League), are better descriptions. The Obamas come from there, for example. Mainly, the Obamas learned how to sleep through the sermons of Rev. Jeremiah Wright(?). Even Rev. Wright was unable to do that! The article points out that there is no apparent, anti-Obama, "wave" underway. Probably, they have been busy(?)!

Cotton's senior Harvard essay apparently went so far as to condemn democracy on the basis of self-interests. The natural Conservative state is a "War of all against all,".
kind of concept. Even Moses would forbid interest among the Hebrews, however. In Deuteronomy 23:19-20, "Screw 'Em" is actually what Israel does to foreigners. That is way before the UN apparently signed onto it. . . or Israel. . . .or something(?)! The Conservative Free Market of Adam Smith, in fact, cannot exist, following Cotton's own basis philosphy. Applied usury is shown in Matthew 25:14-30 to not work. Moses appears to have understood this(?)! It fails, like in the recent foreclosure crisis. The poor don't get enough, the rich houses come tumbling on down. The worse off the poor, the worse off the economy. From liberals right now, instead, there is consciousness of raising the Minimum Wage. Even in Adam Smith economics, there is no clue about any of this.

Neither Cotton nor Adam Smith can be said to have at all applied any lessons from the Christian concept. Adam Smith was actually for a regulated usury(?)! Cotton has some foolish, untenable, basis of "self-interest" that only the brainless, from the Ivy League, could endorse. The recent President Bush is from there, for example. He admitted to having learned that in a recession you apply tax cuts. What he had failed to learn is that taxes had to be owed, first. Half the people owned nothing. The rich didn't need the money. Even Osama bin laden didn't need the money, and went off into hiding in Pakistan. On that basis, the Republicans invaded Iraq(?). Apparently Saddam Hussein had some money(?) The U.S. was bailed out $1.0 tril., but not from the Ivy League tax cuts kind of basis. The basis for invading Iraq was shown fraudulent, and Conservative inspired.

Senator McConnell is also not well-liked, in Kentucky, even.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many working mothers, not always White Eyes, hope to spend more time with young braves and Little Susies!)
 

Forum List

Back
Top