You Believe NASA should be cut? Read this and think again.

Discussion in 'Science and Technology' started by nitroz, Aug 13, 2012.

  1. nitroz
    Offline

    nitroz INDEPENDENTly ruthless

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    3,421
    Thanks Received:
    445
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    Merritt Island, FL
    Ratings:
    +457
    wtfnasa?

    Nasa deserves to be funded even more to keep innovation up and the economy thriving.
     
  2. Saigon
    Offline

    Saigon Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2012
    Messages:
    11,434
    Thanks Received:
    870
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Location:
    Helsinki, Finland
    Ratings:
    +1,240
    I'd keep funding NASA myself, I think it's a worthy investment at a number of different levels.

    If the US cut 20% of its mlitary budget (largely achived by closing all off-shore bases) it wouldn't have a budget crisis to begin with.
     
  3. JWBooth
    Offline

    JWBooth Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Messages:
    6,799
    Thanks Received:
    1,555
    Trophy Points:
    200
    Location:
    Fredonia Republic
    Ratings:
    +1,957
    Break it up and sell it off.
     
  4. Luddly Neddite
    Offline

    Luddly Neddite Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2011
    Messages:
    53,216
    Thanks Received:
    8,455
    Trophy Points:
    2,040
    Ratings:
    +20,829
    I would love for NASA to have gobs of money to play with and use for all sorts of exciting stuff.

    I'd also really love for every American child to have a home and a full tummy. How about highways and bridges that are not falling apart? And schools that actually teach our kids to compete on the world stage?

    How about we pay our teachers and cops and fire fighters what they're worth?

    Oh wait, I forgot, idiot rw's believe that's CommieMarxFascSoshSomething Or Other. They believe we raise taxes on the middle class and give it to the 1%. Stupid.
     
  5. nitroz
    Offline

    nitroz INDEPENDENTly ruthless

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    3,421
    Thanks Received:
    445
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    Merritt Island, FL
    Ratings:
    +457
    I agree that we should increase jobs for those people who have a direct impact on our everyday lives.

    To Do List:
    1. Cut Defense Spending
    2. End Tax Breaks for All Businesses, Corps, etc. (That plan hasn't worked. They are just hoarding the money instead. It's time to make EVERYONE pay their fair share.)
    3. Increase funding for Law Enforcement, Education, and Firefighting. Make it specific and mandatory that the additional go directly to jobs.

    Now How much are we saving?
    And our tax income has increased while putting more people to work.
     
  6. whitehall
    Online

    whitehall Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    27,707
    Thanks Received:
    4,319
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Western Va.
    Ratings:
    +10,623
    Once we accept the fact that government spending does not grow the economy it's easier to accept the concept of less funding for toys for big boys. It's no secret that NASA is in the global warming propaganda business now that Hussein cut the Space Shuttle program. What's the sense of sending robots to Mars and keeping a hunk of junk in space? Let China and Russia do it for a change. Clinton sold them the technology.
     
  7. nitroz
    Offline

    nitroz INDEPENDENTly ruthless

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    3,421
    Thanks Received:
    445
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    Merritt Island, FL
    Ratings:
    +457


    Well, Tax cuts don't improve the economy. Instead, it just lets the well off hoard their money, deficits increase, and unemployment rates rise.

    It's time for something that gives SOME kind of RESULTS to anyone besides the well off. It might not prove to be much in the end, but IT'S A START!
     
  8. hortysir
    Offline

    hortysir In Memorial of 47

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2010
    Messages:
    20,459
    Thanks Received:
    4,027
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Location:
    Lakeland, FL
    Ratings:
    +6,296
    Private enterprise can do the same thing, cheaper and without government monies
     
  9. Saigon
    Offline

    Saigon Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2012
    Messages:
    11,434
    Thanks Received:
    870
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Location:
    Helsinki, Finland
    Ratings:
    +1,240
    Interesting then that healthare in the US costs 6 - 10 times per capita what it does in countries which offer universal healthcare.

    And let's face it - it is very often superior healthcare, as well.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. flacaltenn
    Online

    flacaltenn USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    29,992
    Thanks Received:
    4,651
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Hillbilly Hollywood, Tenn
    Ratings:
    +13,329
    NASA should be focused on automated robotic exploration of space and ASSISTING private industry to gain payload and delivery expertise.

    There are issues to resolve in Climate Change and Earth Resources such as upper atmospheric measurements, solar irradiance measurements, ocean studies and other tasks that should be continued.

    The rockets and payloads are ALREADY private. NASA doesn't make crap. And the Mars rovers are a prime example of leveraging tech into the private sector. To make a rover -- you are developing the same type of breakthrus required for 21st Century manufacturing automation.

    But the days of cowboys riding rockets is probably over for them. And orbiting labs that don't really have a payback or application other than doing maintenance on expensive telescopes.
     

Share This Page