It's like somebody was drowning and then Obama threw those folks a life preserver, but the detractors of the O-man are complaining that the people still got wet.
You will never convince those who choose not to believe, that anything Obama has done was a good thing.
In part this debate is entirely pointless because proving such a thing is impossible.
There's just no way to know what might have happened to a macroeconomy if something other than what was done had been done instead.
This problem doesn't merely apply to debates about this POTUS or this economy, this unprovablity problem applies to EVERY POTUS and every policy that is done in a macro-economy.
You will never convince those who choose not to believe, that anything Obama has done was a good thing.
In part this debate is entirely pointless because proving such a thing is impossible.
There's just no way to know what might have happened to a macroeconomy if something other than what was done had been done instead.
This problem doesn't merely apply to debates about this POTUS or this economy, this unprovablity problem applies to EVERY POTUS and every policy that is done in a macro-economy.
Last edited: