Yes, The Biden Impeachment Hearing Presented Evidence Of Corruption — Lots Of It

[Votar Roja]

Yes, The Biden Impeachment Hearing Presented Evidence Of Corruption — Lots Of It​

Biden Impeachment Hearing Had Ample Evidence Of Corruption

On the first day of Biden’s impeachment inquiry, Republicans brought mountains of evidence of corruption. Democrats and the media shrugged.

thefederalist.com

he corporate news media all but refused to cover the opening hearing of the House impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden on Thursday, and to the extent they did, it was only to repeat, at the behest of the White House, the exhausted mantra that there’s “no evidence” connecting Biden to his son Hunter’s international bribery scheme . . . . But if the media had actually covered it, the American public might have heard more about the mounds of damning evidence now piling up by the day, including the release on Wednesday by the House Ways and Means Committee of reams of text messages and emails between Hunter Biden, his uncle James Biden, and a colorful array of foreign oligarchs, business associates, and bagmen. All told, House Republicans presented more than two dozen pieces of evidence on Thursday linking Joe Biden to his son’s overseas business dealings. This evidence was the centerpiece of the hearing Thursday, which served to lay the groundwork for the impeachment inquiry. So far, the evidence suggests the Biden family “business” is exactly what it appears to be: an influence-peddling scheme on a scale never before seen in American history. George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley, who testified at the hearing, said that even though Washington, D.C., is “awash” in influence-peddling, he’s never seen “anything of this size and complexity,” and that Congress has a “duty to determine if the president is involved in what is a known form of corruption.”

OP COMMENT: The fake news media are now just pure liars. Period. No more pretense, no more weak attempts to cover it up. CNN. MSNBC and the rest are now just 100% liars.

 

[Mac1958]

Yes, The Biden Impeachment Hearing Presented Evidence Of Corruption — Lots Of It​

Biden Impeachment Hearing Had Ample Evidence Of Corruption

On the first day of Biden’s impeachment inquiry, Republicans brought mountains of evidence of corruption. Democrats and the media shrugged.

thefederalist.com

he corporate news media all but refused to cover the opening hearing of the House impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden on Thursday, and to the extent they did, it was only to repeat, at the behest of the White House, the exhausted mantra that there’s “no evidence” connecting Biden to his son Hunter’s international bribery scheme . . . . But if the media had actually covered it, the American public might have heard more about the mounds of damning evidence now piling up by the day, including the release on Wednesday by the House Ways and Means Committee of reams of text messages and emails between Hunter Biden, his uncle James Biden, and a colorful array of foreign oligarchs, business associates, and bagmen. All told, House Republicans presented more than two dozen pieces of evidence on Thursday linking Joe Biden to his son’s overseas business dealings. This evidence was the centerpiece of the hearing Thursday, which served to lay the groundwork for the impeachment inquiry. So far, the evidence suggests the Biden family “business” is exactly what it appears to be: an influence-peddling scheme on a scale never before seen in American history. George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley, who testified at the hearing, said that even though Washington, D.C., is “awash” in influence-peddling, he’s never seen “anything of this size and complexity,” and that Congress has a “duty to determine if the president is involved in what is a known form of corruption.”

OP COMMENT: The fake news media are now just pure liars. Period. No more pretense, no more weak attempts to cover it up. CNN. MSNBC and the rest are now just 100% liars.

So you disagree with Turley's statement, "“I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment"?

And the testimony of Bruce Dubinsky, a forensic accountant called on by Republicans, who said, “I am not here today to even suggest that there was corruption, fraud, or any wrongdoing. In my opinion, more information needs to be gathered and assessed before I would make such an assessment"?

You know more than these people?

 

[Votar Roja]

Yes, The Biden Impeachment Hearing Presented Evidence Of Corruption — Lots Of It​

Biden Impeachment Hearing Had Ample Evidence Of Corruption

On the first day of Biden’s impeachment inquiry, Republicans brought mountains of evidence of corruption. Democrats and the media shrugged.

thefederalist.com

he corporate news media all but refused to cover the opening hearing of the House impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden on Thursday, and to the extent they did, it was only to repeat, at the behest of the White House, the exhausted mantra that there’s “no evidence” connecting Biden to his son Hunter’s international bribery scheme . . . . But if the media had actually covered it, the American public might have heard more about the mounds of damning evidence now piling up by the day, including the release on Wednesday by the House Ways and Means Committee of reams of text messages and emails between Hunter Biden, his uncle James Biden, and a colorful array of foreign oligarchs, business associates, and bagmen. All told, House Republicans presented more than two dozen pieces of evidence on Thursday linking Joe Biden to his son’s overseas business dealings. This evidence was the centerpiece of the hearing Thursday, which served to lay the groundwork for the impeachment inquiry. So far, the evidence suggests the Biden family “business” is exactly what it appears to be: an influence-peddling scheme on a scale never before seen in American history. George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley, who testified at the hearing, said that even though Washington, D.C., is “awash” in influence-peddling, he’s never seen “anything of this size and complexity,” and that Congress has a “duty to determine if the president is involved in what is a known form of corruption.”

OP COMMENT: The fake news media are now just pure liars. Period. No more pretense, no more weak attempts to cover it up. CNN. MSNBC and the rest are now just 100% liars.

MORE:

" . . . . Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina brought up an FBI memo released Wednesday by the House Ways and Means Committee about another former business partner of Hunter’s, Tony Bobulinksi. In an FBI interview, Bobulinksi said that in 2015-16 Hunter and Hunter’s uncle James did business with CEFC, a Chinese company with close ties to the Chinese government. But because Biden was still vice president, Hunter and James weren’t paid right away. “There was a concern it would be improper,” Bobulinksi said, because of the company’s affiliation with the Chinese Communist Party.

But Hunter and James wanted to get paid. According to Bobulinksi, “they believed CEFC owed them money for the benefits that accrued to CEFC through its use of the Biden family name to advance their business dealings.” Once Biden left office, Hunter and James were paid more than a million dollars by CEFC. “Now we know why,” said Mace. “Because it was back-pay.”

Later in the hearing, Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida showed organizational charts of Hunter Biden’s businesses created by the IRS team investigating the president’s son, including from 2014, when Joe Biden was vice president, and 2018, when he was a private citizen. The charts show a dizzying array of interrelated companies — none of which involved real estate or any other industry where you would typically see this kind of complex matrix of different business entities and shell companies. Donalds then shared a text message between Hunter and James Biden in which Hunter, discussing a business deal, tells his uncle, “You’ve been drawn into something purely for the purpose of protecting Dad.”

This is just a sample, but you get the idea. Hunter was engaged in a patently corrupt scheme that involved selling access to his father, one of the most powerful politicians on the planet.

 

[BULLDOG]

Yes, The Biden Impeachment Hearing Presented Evidence Of Corruption — Lots Of It​

Biden Impeachment Hearing Had Ample Evidence Of Corruption

On the first day of Biden’s impeachment inquiry, Republicans brought mountains of evidence of corruption. Democrats and the media shrugged.

thefederalist.com

he corporate news media all but refused to cover the opening hearing of the House impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden on Thursday, and to the extent they did, it was only to repeat, at the behest of the White House, the exhausted mantra that there’s “no evidence” connecting Biden to his son Hunter’s international bribery scheme . . . . But if the media had actually covered it, the American public might have heard more about the mounds of damning evidence now piling up by the day, including the release on Wednesday by the House Ways and Means Committee of reams of text messages and emails between Hunter Biden, his uncle James Biden, and a colorful array of foreign oligarchs, business associates, and bagmen. All told, House Republicans presented more than two dozen pieces of evidence on Thursday linking Joe Biden to his son’s overseas business dealings. This evidence was the centerpiece of the hearing Thursday, which served to lay the groundwork for the impeachment inquiry. So far, the evidence suggests the Biden family “business” is exactly what it appears to be: an influence-peddling scheme on a scale never before seen in American history. George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley, who testified at the hearing, said that even though Washington, D.C., is “awash” in influence-peddling, he’s never seen “anything of this size and complexity,” and that Congress has a “duty to determine if the president is involved in what is a known form of corruption.”

OP COMMENT: The fake news media are now just pure liars. Period. No more pretense, no more weak attempts to cover it up. CNN. MSNBC and the rest are now just 100% liars.

Each and every witness testifying before that committee was asked under oath if they could present evidence that Joe Biden committed any impeachable acts. Each and every one answered no.

 

[BULLDOG]

I did business with a company in Houston. That business also made profit from a deal with a known drug dealer. Does that implicate me in drug dealing? The business in Houston was a car dealership.

 

[busybee01]

Yes, The Biden Impeachment Hearing Presented Evidence Of Corruption — Lots Of It​

Biden Impeachment Hearing Had Ample Evidence Of Corruption

On the first day of Biden’s impeachment inquiry, Republicans brought mountains of evidence of corruption. Democrats and the media shrugged.

thefederalist.com

he corporate news media all but refused to cover the opening hearing of the House impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden on Thursday, and to the extent they did, it was only to repeat, at the behest of the White House, the exhausted mantra that there’s “no evidence” connecting Biden to his son Hunter’s international bribery scheme . . . . But if the media had actually covered it, the American public might have heard more about the mounds of damning evidence now piling up by the day, including the release on Wednesday by the House Ways and Means Committee of reams of text messages and emails between Hunter Biden, his uncle James Biden, and a colorful array of foreign oligarchs, business associates, and bagmen. All told, House Republicans presented more than two dozen pieces of evidence on Thursday linking Joe Biden to his son’s overseas business dealings. This evidence was the centerpiece of the hearing Thursday, which served to lay the groundwork for the impeachment inquiry. So far, the evidence suggests the Biden family “business” is exactly what it appears to be: an influence-peddling scheme on a scale never before seen in American history. George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley, who testified at the hearing, said that even though Washington, D.C., is “awash” in influence-peddling, he’s never seen “anything of this size and complexity,” and that Congress has a “duty to determine if the president is involved in what is a known form of corruption.”

OP COMMENT: The fake news media are now just pure liars. Period. No more pretense, no more weak attempts to cover it up. CNN. MSNBC and the rest are now just 100% liars.

You are a 100% liar. Even Republicans admit there was no evidence of anything. In addition, AOC caught Republicans using a fake document.

 

[CowboyTed]

Yes, The Biden Impeachment Hearing Presented Evidence Of Corruption — Lots Of It​

Biden Impeachment Hearing Had Ample Evidence Of Corruption

On the first day of Biden’s impeachment inquiry, Republicans brought mountains of evidence of corruption. Democrats and the media shrugged.

thefederalist.com

he corporate news media all but refused to cover the opening hearing of the House impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden on Thursday, and to the extent they did, it was only to repeat, at the behest of the White House, the exhausted mantra that there’s “no evidence” connecting Biden to his son Hunter’s international bribery scheme . . . . But if the media had actually covered it, the American public might have heard more about the mounds of damning evidence now piling up by the day, including the release on Wednesday by the House Ways and Means Committee of reams of text messages and emails between Hunter Biden, his uncle James Biden, and a colorful array of foreign oligarchs, business associates, and bagmen. All told, House Republicans presented more than two dozen pieces of evidence on Thursday linking Joe Biden to his son’s overseas business dealings. This evidence was the centerpiece of the hearing Thursday, which served to lay the groundwork for the impeachment inquiry. So far, the evidence suggests the Biden family “business” is exactly what it appears to be: an influence-peddling scheme on a scale never before seen in American history. George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley, who testified at the hearing, said that even though Washington, D.C., is “awash” in influence-peddling, he’s never seen “anything of this size and complexity,” and that Congress has a “duty to determine if the president is involved in what is a known form of corruption.”

OP COMMENT: The fake news media are now just pure liars. Period. No more pretense, no more weak attempts to cover it up. CNN. MSNBC and the rest are now just 100% liars.

This is not about the media anymore...

We are seeing the hearings in Congress... The Republicans are getting their asses handed to them...
That is truth, there is no media going on there and it is clear proof that you Right Wing Media bubble has been lying to you.

The question you have to ask yourself... Are you going to continue accept being lied too. If you say yes, then the fool is you, not them...

 

[konradv]

Yes, The Biden Impeachment Hearing Presented Evidence Of Corruption — Lots Of It​

Biden Impeachment Hearing Had Ample Evidence Of Corruption

On the first day of Biden’s impeachment inquiry, Republicans brought mountains of evidence of corruption. Democrats and the media shrugged.

thefederalist.com

he corporate news media all but refused to cover the opening hearing of the House impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden on Thursday, and to the extent they did, it was only to repeat, at the behest of the White House, the exhausted mantra that there’s “no evidence” connecting Biden to his son Hunter’s international bribery scheme . . . . But if the media had actually covered it, the American public might have heard more about the mounds of damning evidence now piling up by the day, including the release on Wednesday by the House Ways and Means Committee of reams of text messages and emails between Hunter Biden, his uncle James Biden, and a colorful array of foreign oligarchs, business associates, and bagmen. All told, House Republicans presented more than two dozen pieces of evidence on Thursday linking Joe Biden to his son’s overseas business dealings. This evidence was the centerpiece of the hearing Thursday, which served to lay the groundwork for the impeachment inquiry. So far, the evidence suggests the Biden family “business” is exactly what it appears to be: an influence-peddling scheme on a scale never before seen in American history. George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley, who testified at the hearing, said that even though Washington, D.C., is “awash” in influence-peddling, he’s never seen “anything of this size and complexity,” and that Congress has a “duty to determine if the president is involved in what is a known form of corruption.”

OP COMMENT: The fake news media are now just pure liars. Period. No more pretense, no more weak attempts to cover it up. CNN. MSNBC and the rest are now just 100% liars.

It’s funny how there’s tons of evidence against Biden, but to MAGA, Trump is pure as snow! Is it any wonder they can’t get any traction, except in cherry-picked polls?

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

I did business with a company in Houston. That business also made profit from a deal with a known drug dealer. Does that implicate me in drug dealing? The business in Houston was a car dealership.

Under Rico , possibly.

 

[BULLDOG]

Under Rico , possibly.

You don't understand rico.

 

[22lcidw]

This is not about the media anymore...

We are seeing the hearings in Congress... The Republicans are getting their asses handed to them...
That is truth, there is no media going on there and it is clear proof that you Right Wing Media bubble has been lying to you.

The question you have to ask yourself... Are you going to continue accept being lied too. If you say yes, then the fool is you, not them...

Republicans do not have the 95% of the media/TV/entertainment world supporting them like they do the Progs. And Progs have many politicians who are into theatrics due to it.

 

[Vrenn]

MORE:

" . . . . Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina brought up an FBI memo released Wednesday by the House Ways and Means Committee about another former business partner of Hunter’s, Tony Bobulinksi. In an FBI interview, Bobulinksi said that in 2015-16 Hunter and Hunter’s uncle James did business with CEFC, a Chinese company with close ties to the Chinese government. But because Biden was still vice president, Hunter and James weren’t paid right away. “There was a concern it would be improper,” Bobulinksi said, because of the company’s affiliation with the Chinese Communist Party.

But Hunter and James wanted to get paid. According to Bobulinksi, “they believed CEFC owed them money for the benefits that accrued to CEFC through its use of the Biden family name to advance their business dealings.” Once Biden left office, Hunter and James were paid more than a million dollars by CEFC. “Now we know why,” said Mace. “Because it was back-pay.”

Later in the hearing, Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida showed organizational charts of Hunter Biden’s businesses created by the IRS team investigating the president’s son, including from 2014, when Joe Biden was vice president, and 2018, when he was a private citizen. The charts show a dizzying array of interrelated companies — none of which involved real estate or any other industry where you would typically see this kind of complex matrix of different business entities and shell companies. Donalds then shared a text message between Hunter and James Biden in which Hunter, discussing a business deal, tells his uncle, “You’ve been drawn into something purely for the purpose of protecting Dad.”

This is just a sample, but you get the idea. Hunter was engaged in a patently corrupt scheme that involved selling access to his father, one of the most powerful politicians on the planet.

You have made a great case for impeaching Hunter Biden. One problem, you can't impeach a civilian. You can convict Hunter but not impeach.

 

[alang1216]

MORE:

" . . . . Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina brought up an FBI memo released Wednesday by the House Ways and Means Committee about another former business partner of Hunter’s, Tony Bobulinksi. In an FBI interview, Bobulinksi said that in 2015-16 Hunter and Hunter’s uncle James did business with CEFC, a Chinese company with close ties to the Chinese government. But because Biden was still vice president, Hunter and James weren’t paid right away. “There was a concern it would be improper,” Bobulinksi said, because of the company’s affiliation with the Chinese Communist Party.

But Hunter and James wanted to get paid. According to Bobulinksi, “they believed CEFC owed them money for the benefits that accrued to CEFC through its use of the Biden family name to advance their business dealings.” Once Biden left office, Hunter and James were paid more than a million dollars by CEFC. “Now we know why,” said Mace. “Because it was back-pay.”

Later in the hearing, Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida showed organizational charts of Hunter Biden’s businesses created by the IRS team investigating the president’s son, including from 2014, when Joe Biden was vice president, and 2018, when he was a private citizen. The charts show a dizzying array of interrelated companies — none of which involved real estate or any other industry where you would typically see this kind of complex matrix of different business entities and shell companies. Donalds then shared a text message between Hunter and James Biden in which Hunter, discussing a business deal, tells his uncle, “You’ve been drawn into something purely for the purpose of protecting Dad.”

This is just a sample, but you get the idea. Hunter was engaged in a patently corrupt scheme that involved selling access to his father, one of the most powerful politicians on the planet.

I'm confused, is it an impeachment of Hunter or of Joe? No one is defending Hunter even though he may not have broken any laws.

 

[Penelope]

Yes, The Biden Impeachment Hearing Presented Evidence Of Corruption — Lots Of It​

Biden Impeachment Hearing Had Ample Evidence Of Corruption

On the first day of Biden’s impeachment inquiry, Republicans brought mountains of evidence of corruption. Democrats and the media shrugged.

thefederalist.com

he corporate news media all but refused to cover the opening hearing of the House impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden on Thursday, and to the extent they did, it was only to repeat, at the behest of the White House, the exhausted mantra that there’s “no evidence” connecting Biden to his son Hunter’s international bribery scheme . . . . But if the media had actually covered it, the American public might have heard more about the mounds of damning evidence now piling up by the day, including the release on Wednesday by the House Ways and Means Committee of reams of text messages and emails between Hunter Biden, his uncle James Biden, and a colorful array of foreign oligarchs, business associates, and bagmen. All told, House Republicans presented more than two dozen pieces of evidence on Thursday linking Joe Biden to his son’s overseas business dealings. This evidence was the centerpiece of the hearing Thursday, which served to lay the groundwork for the impeachment inquiry. So far, the evidence suggests the Biden family “business” is exactly what it appears to be: an influence-peddling scheme on a scale never before seen in American history. George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley, who testified at the hearing, said that even though Washington, D.C., is “awash” in influence-peddling, he’s never seen “anything of this size and complexity,” and that Congress has a “duty to determine if the president is involved in what is a known form of corruption.”

OP COMMENT: The fake news media are now just pure liars. Period. No more pretense, no more weak attempts to cover it up. CNN. MSNBC and the rest are now just 100% liars.

Ah yes, Joe Biden loved his son so much that he made him the frontman of an international bribery scheme and money-laundering operation.



"that is the reason he stayed out of it."

 

[22lcidw]

Ah yes, Joe Biden loved his son so much that he made him the frontman of an international bribery scheme and money-laundering operation.



"that is the reason he stayed out of it."

Innocent little Progs. The Prog house member pulling the fire alarm is all you gotta know.

 

[Vrenn]

I'm confused, is it an impeachment of Hunter or of Joe? No one is defending Hunter even though he may not have broken any laws.

They want to impeach Hunter of some office. But they just can't figure out which office to impeach him from. We are not talking the brightest bulbs in the box here.

 

[Hellokitty]

So you disagree with Turley's statement, "“I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment"?

And the testimony of Bruce Dubinsky, a forensic accountant called on by Republicans, who said, “I am not here today to even suggest that there was corruption, fraud, or any wrongdoing. In my opinion, more information needs to be gathered and assessed before I would make such an assessment"?

You know more than these people?

He said the same about the democrats articles of impeachment for TRUMP, but that didn't stop democrats.

 

[22lcidw]

They want to impeach Hunter of some office. But they just can't figure out which office to impeach him from. We are not talking the brightest bulbs in the box here.

Joe is dirty and protected.

 

[miketx]

And the lying derangement continues unabated...

 

[Mac1958]

He said the same about the democrats articles of impeachment for TRUMP, but that didn't stop democrats.

So you're no better than those you hate.

Okay.