Jarlaxle
Gold Member
He has not the slightest idea.What are you even trying to say here?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He has not the slightest idea.What are you even trying to say here?
Right. All he really knows is guns are bad.He has not the slightest idea.
It's a veritable weapon of war!!!!!
The fascists over at Everytown for gun confiscation want your lever action rifles too........
Everytown Describes Lever-Actions as 'Deadly Innovation'
bearingarms.com
I sure am glad I already have a Henry 45 LC.The fascists over at Everytown for gun confiscation want your lever action rifles too........
Everytown Describes Lever-Actions as 'Deadly Innovation'
bearingarms.com
All the while, 100,000s die from other preventable means, every year, yet is not a political issue:3 out of 99,997 = 3 x 10 x 330 = # of bad apples. In one night? one afternoon? one bible day?
I have seen ONE anti-gun activist agree that we should physically limit all vehicles to 35 mph or less to virtually eliminate highway deaths. They are willing to lose tens of thousands of lives every year on the highways just because they want to drive fast. Then they want to yell that a no one NEEDS a gun so they should be allowed to have one.All the while, 100,000s die from other preventable means, every year, yet is not a political issue:
Drunk, High, Distracted Driving
Second Hand Tobacco smoke
Illegal Drug use
Even though alcohol and tobacco users affect primarily themselves, the amount of death inflicted on those abusers and the addicted is astronomical compared to gun deaths. But no one gives a flying F because politicians haven't made it a political issue... yet.
I suspect many of them actually want to ban automobile ownership by most people...they're just not willing to admit it.I have seen ONE anti-gun activist agree that we should physically limit all vehicles to 35 mph or less to virtually eliminate highway deaths. They are willing to lose tens of thousands of lives every year on the highways just because they want to drive fast. Then they want to yell that a no one NEEDS a gun so they should be allowed to have one.
It's a veritable weapon of war!!!!!
I think it was Beetlejuice (previous Mayor of Chicago) that said revolvers have to be banned because the definition of a machine gun is any gun that, when you pull the trigger to fire one round, has another round in the chamber and ready to fire.The fascists over at Everytown for gun confiscation want your lever action rifles too........
Everytown Describes Lever-Actions as 'Deadly Innovation'
bearingarms.com
They hate pump action shotguns. They were banned in Australia because they're scary. They're scary here, too, if you listen to the anti-gunners. Whenever they watch a TV show or movie and someone is scary, they write another anti-gun paper. They have no idea what scary is and won't until they take all of our guns and only those who want to kill them, both in and out of government, have guns. Now that is scary but there won't be anyone left to defend them. The memory of Martin Niemöller comes to mind.I wonder what they would think of my Troy pump-action "PAR".
Now For Something A Bit Different.....Troy Sporting rifle/PAR.....A Pump Action "AR"
I know.....But why? you may ask.....What can I say, I like the strange and unusual.....A Pump-Action "AR". Troy calls it both a Troy Sporting Rifle and a PAR. A guy from NY came into the shop I was at with a rifle I'd never seen before, a pump-action "AR" built by Troy Industries he wanted...www.usmessageboard.com
Funny I find this thread today. I was watching the Rifleman on TV today in an episode where he showed the bolt he added to his lever to make it fire every time it's cocked and I was imagining how the ATF would call that a machine gun.
Lever actions have been around since the 1850s. You can't compromise with the gun controllers. Every time you do, the just start the next round of compromise and we have to give a little (or a lot) more. There are two answers (there was once just one but that was negotiated away in 1934) The original only answer, and the ultimate answer for us, when it comes to gun control compromise is "shall not be infringed". Because that was negotiated away in 1934, the second answer we're stuck with today, and it is a persistent answer until we get back to the first answer, is "no more compromise, period".Hey I have an idea! Let's design a 20th century modern sporting rifle built around an 1890 operating mechanism.
The Kali-Key is also an interesting idea. You get a bolt action AR. It's still black and ugly and scares them so they'll still go after them.They made it (very high quality/accurate) for ban-staters to get around the semi-auto rules. This one came out of NY.
Kinda puts the Bruen argument on our side with positive proof of historical tradition and historical common use - just in case the Court isn't strong enough in their commitment for modern common use of 20 million + Americans.Huge innovation when it was invented in the 1840s. LOL!
Imagine how shocked the gun nazis will be when they find out we've had "assault rifles" for the past 100 years.
The Hosers made importers (like Masen) drill a hole and weld a peg into the bottom of a 10-SKS magazine to limit it to five rounds.....And bugger it up they did.The Kali-Key is also an interesting idea. You get a bolt action AR. It's still black and ugly and scares them so they'll still go after them.