Can I have the right to fuck little furry animals, too?
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Wyoming's proposed anti-LGBT law
- Thread starter JakeStarkey
- Start date
Billy_Kinetta
Paladin of the Lost Hour
- Mar 4, 2013
- 52,766
- 22,197
- 2,320
Since when is the LBGT community not entitled to the same rights and protections as any other AmericanFrom a friend in Wyoming:
The Wyoming State Legislature is considering a bill that, if passed, would become the most oppressive and wide-ranging anti-LGBT law in the nation. It would allow social workers to deny aid, teachers to not teach, health care workers to deny service not only to individuals that identify as LGBT, but their children as well. And that is just part of the bill... this bill tells our LGBT brothers and sisters that they are not worthy to receive services a straight cisgendered individual can receive.
HB-135 is scheduled to be voted upon by the Wyoming House Judiciary Committee this week, its first step toward becoming law. Please call and/or email members of this committee (contact info pasted below) and tell them to VOTE NO ON HB-135. No hate in the equality state!
Remember: Be firm but polite; introduce yourself and say where you're from; make your message personal.
Wyoming House Judiciary Committee -
Dan Kirkbride (Chugwater)
Cell - (307) 331-2265
[email protected]
Mark Baker (Rock Springs)
Cell - (307) 371-5113
[email protected]
Bo Biteman (Ranchester)
Cell - (307) 763-7613
[email protected]
Mark Jennings (Sheridan)
Cell - (307) 461-0697
[email protected]
Jared Olsen (Cheyenne)
Cell - (307) 509-0242
[email protected]
Charles Pelkey (Laramie)
Cell - (307) 920-0542
[email protected]
Bill Pownall (Gillette)
Home - (307) 682-4148
[email protected]
Tim Salazar (Dubois)
Cell - (307) 220-1213
[email protected]
Nathan Winters (Thermopolis)
Home - (307) 864-3690
[email protected]
This is what you get when you use courts to force gay marriage on places that don't want it, and force non-essential businesses to either "bake or die".
When your side becomes unreasonable, don't be surprised when the other side does the exact same thing.
They may be entitled to it, but their rights do not automatically outweigh the rights of others, as in a right of a baker to not participate in a ceremony it finds sinful.
Indeed.
"Your rights end where mine begin."
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,519
- 2,165
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #23
You turned that inside out. You have every right to protest over this. You are simply wrong that what you believe outweighs that of someone else.No one is forcing their views on anyone, the LGBT community just wants the same rights and privileges as anyone else.That's it exactly, Marty, local elities can't block civil rights.
Period.
So, if the WY lege passes it and the Gov signs it, the legislation then goes to federal court and will be overturned.
Waste of the taxpayers' money.
Depends on the Court.
Still the fault of the LGBT progressive extremists who feel the need to force their views on others.
No, they want some people to lose their 1st amendment rights over butthurt.
brummelben
Gold Member
- Sep 29, 2016
- 6,514
- 650
- 200
- Banned
- #24
Can I have the right to fuck little furry animals, too?yup, try it- you would like itMen licking hairy balls is a right?Since when is the LBGT community not entitled to the same rights and protections as any other AmericanFrom a friend in Wyoming:
The Wyoming State Legislature is considering a bill that, if passed, would become the most oppressive and wide-ranging anti-LGBT law in the nation. It would allow social workers to deny aid, teachers to not teach, health care workers to deny service not only to individuals that identify as LGBT, but their children as well. And that is just part of the bill... this bill tells our LGBT brothers and sisters that they are not worthy to receive services a straight cisgendered individual can receive.
HB-135 is scheduled to be voted upon by the Wyoming House Judiciary Committee this week, its first step toward becoming law. Please call and/or email members of this committee (contact info pasted below) and tell them to VOTE NO ON HB-135. No hate in the equality state!
Remember: Be firm but polite; introduce yourself and say where you're from; make your message personal.
Wyoming House Judiciary Committee -
Dan Kirkbride (Chugwater)
Cell - (307) 331-2265
[email protected]
Mark Baker (Rock Springs)
Cell - (307) 371-5113
[email protected]
Bo Biteman (Ranchester)
Cell - (307) 763-7613
[email protected]
Mark Jennings (Sheridan)
Cell - (307) 461-0697
[email protected]
Jared Olsen (Cheyenne)
Cell - (307) 509-0242
[email protected]
Charles Pelkey (Laramie)
Cell - (307) 920-0542
[email protected]
Bill Pownall (Gillette)
Home - (307) 682-4148
[email protected]
Tim Salazar (Dubois)
Cell - (307) 220-1213
[email protected]
Nathan Winters (Thermopolis)
Home - (307) 864-3690
[email protected]
This is what you get when you use courts to force gay marriage on places that don't want it, and force non-essential businesses to either "bake or die".
When your side becomes unreasonable, don't be surprised when the other side does the exact same thing.
If thats your thing, go for it. Who cares what you do in the privacy of your own homeCan I have the right to fuck little furry animals, too?yup, try it- you would like itMen licking hairy balls is a right?Since when is the LBGT community not entitled to the same rights and protections as any other AmericanFrom a friend in Wyoming:
The Wyoming State Legislature is considering a bill that, if passed, would become the most oppressive and wide-ranging anti-LGBT law in the nation. It would allow social workers to deny aid, teachers to not teach, health care workers to deny service not only to individuals that identify as LGBT, but their children as well. And that is just part of the bill... this bill tells our LGBT brothers and sisters that they are not worthy to receive services a straight cisgendered individual can receive.
HB-135 is scheduled to be voted upon by the Wyoming House Judiciary Committee this week, its first step toward becoming law. Please call and/or email members of this committee (contact info pasted below) and tell them to VOTE NO ON HB-135. No hate in the equality state!
Remember: Be firm but polite; introduce yourself and say where you're from; make your message personal.
Wyoming House Judiciary Committee -
Dan Kirkbride (Chugwater)
Cell - (307) 331-2265
[email protected]
Mark Baker (Rock Springs)
Cell - (307) 371-5113
[email protected]
Bo Biteman (Ranchester)
Cell - (307) 763-7613
[email protected]
Mark Jennings (Sheridan)
Cell - (307) 461-0697
[email protected]
Jared Olsen (Cheyenne)
Cell - (307) 509-0242
[email protected]
Charles Pelkey (Laramie)
Cell - (307) 920-0542
[email protected]
Bill Pownall (Gillette)
Home - (307) 682-4148
[email protected]
Tim Salazar (Dubois)
Cell - (307) 220-1213
[email protected]
Nathan Winters (Thermopolis)
Home - (307) 864-3690
[email protected]
This is what you get when you use courts to force gay marriage on places that don't want it, and force non-essential businesses to either "bake or die".
When your side becomes unreasonable, don't be surprised when the other side does the exact same thing.
- Sep 27, 2012
- 92,112
- 53,727
- 2,605
are gays/trannies protected federally?That's it exactly, Marty, local elities can't block civil rights.
Period.
So, if the WY lege passes it and the Gov signs it, the legislation then goes to federal court and will be overturned.
Waste of the taxpayers' money.
Fenton Lum
Gold Member
- May 7, 2016
- 22,735
- 1,442
- 265
- Banned
- #26
. . . to not be denied an adult's rights in private by the likes of you. And your weirdo beliefs cannot be denied, either, see?Men licking hairy balls is a right?Since when is the LBGT community not entitled to the same rights and protections as any other AmericanFrom a friend in Wyoming:
The Wyoming State Legislature is considering a bill that, if passed, would become the most oppressive and wide-ranging anti-LGBT law in the nation. It would allow social workers to deny aid, teachers to not teach, health care workers to deny service not only to individuals that identify as LGBT, but their children as well. And that is just part of the bill... this bill tells our LGBT brothers and sisters that they are not worthy to receive services a straight cisgendered individual can receive.
HB-135 is scheduled to be voted upon by the Wyoming House Judiciary Committee this week, its first step toward becoming law. Please call and/or email members of this committee (contact info pasted below) and tell them to VOTE NO ON HB-135. No hate in the equality state!
Remember: Be firm but polite; introduce yourself and say where you're from; make your message personal.
Wyoming House Judiciary Committee -
Dan Kirkbride (Chugwater)
Cell - (307) 331-2265
[email protected]
Mark Baker (Rock Springs)
Cell - (307) 371-5113
[email protected]
Bo Biteman (Ranchester)
Cell - (307) 763-7613
[email protected]
Mark Jennings (Sheridan)
Cell - (307) 461-0697
[email protected]
Jared Olsen (Cheyenne)
Cell - (307) 509-0242
[email protected]
Charles Pelkey (Laramie)
Cell - (307) 920-0542
[email protected]
Bill Pownall (Gillette)
Home - (307) 682-4148
[email protected]
Tim Salazar (Dubois)
Cell - (307) 220-1213
[email protected]
Nathan Winters (Thermopolis)
Home - (307) 864-3690
[email protected]
This is what you get when you use courts to force gay marriage on places that don't want it, and force non-essential businesses to either "bake or die".
When your side becomes unreasonable, don't be surprised when the other side does the exact same thing.
The Becky Devos/Eric Prince theocracy push on the move.
Bob Blaylock
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #27
They may be entitled to it, but their rights do not automatically outweigh the rights of others, as in a right of a baker to not participate in a ceremony it finds sinful.
No one is forced to be a baker.
Everyone needs to make a living. Nothing anywhere in the Constitution suggests that it is in any way legitimate for government to compel anyone to give up any of their essential Constitutional rights as a condition of being allowed to do so.
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,519
- 2,165
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #28
The Prince of America's Blackwater wants to deny those with whom he disagress the right to live as they wish.. . . to not be denied an adult's rights in private by the likes of you. And your weirdo beliefs cannot be denied, either, see?Men licking hairy balls is a right?Since when is the LBGT community not entitled to the same rights and protections as any other AmericanFrom a friend in Wyoming:
The Wyoming State Legislature is considering a bill that, if passed, would become the most oppressive and wide-ranging anti-LGBT law in the nation. It would allow social workers to deny aid, teachers to not teach, health care workers to deny service not only to individuals that identify as LGBT, but their children as well. And that is just part of the bill... this bill tells our LGBT brothers and sisters that they are not worthy to receive services a straight cisgendered individual can receive.
HB-135 is scheduled to be voted upon by the Wyoming House Judiciary Committee this week, its first step toward becoming law. Please call and/or email members of this committee (contact info pasted below) and tell them to VOTE NO ON HB-135. No hate in the equality state!
Remember: Be firm but polite; introduce yourself and say where you're from; make your message personal.
Wyoming House Judiciary Committee -
Dan Kirkbride (Chugwater)
Cell - (307) 331-2265
[email protected]
Mark Baker (Rock Springs)
Cell - (307) 371-5113
[email protected]
Bo Biteman (Ranchester)
Cell - (307) 763-7613
[email protected]
Mark Jennings (Sheridan)
Cell - (307) 461-0697
[email protected]
Jared Olsen (Cheyenne)
Cell - (307) 509-0242
[email protected]
Charles Pelkey (Laramie)
Cell - (307) 920-0542
[email protected]
Bill Pownall (Gillette)
Home - (307) 682-4148
[email protected]
Tim Salazar (Dubois)
Cell - (307) 220-1213
[email protected]
Nathan Winters (Thermopolis)
Home - (307) 864-3690
[email protected]
This is what you get when you use courts to force gay marriage on places that don't want it, and force non-essential businesses to either "bake or die".
When your side becomes unreasonable, don't be surprised when the other side does the exact same thing.
The Becky Devos/Eric Prince theocracy push on the move.
- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,463
- 32,441
- 2,300
You turned that inside out. You have every right to protest over this. You are simply wrong that what you believe outweighs that of someone else.No one is forcing their views on anyone, the LGBT community just wants the same rights and privileges as anyone else.That's it exactly, Marty, local elities can't block civil rights.
Period.
So, if the WY lege passes it and the Gov signs it, the legislation then goes to federal court and will be overturned.
Waste of the taxpayers' money.
Depends on the Court.
Still the fault of the LGBT progressive extremists who feel the need to force their views on others.
No, they want some people to lose their 1st amendment rights over butthurt.
There is no right to have the exact cake you want from the exact baker you want for your wedding. There is a right to free exercise of religion. PA laws were designed to protect against systemic economic discrimination, not deciding who's butt hurt is more important.
Im guessing you have the sick twisted opinions about race as well, that we shouldn't "use courts to force desegregation on places that don't want it, and force non-essential businesses to either "bake or die".From a friend in Wyoming:
The Wyoming State Legislature is considering a bill that, if passed, would become the most oppressive and wide-ranging anti-LGBT law in the nation. It would allow social workers to deny aid, teachers to not teach, health care workers to deny service not only to individuals that identify as LGBT, but their children as well. And that is just part of the bill... this bill tells our LGBT brothers and sisters that they are not worthy to receive services a straight cisgendered individual can receive.
HB-135 is scheduled to be voted upon by the Wyoming House Judiciary Committee this week, its first step toward becoming law. Please call and/or email members of this committee (contact info pasted below) and tell them to VOTE NO ON HB-135. No hate in the equality state!
Remember: Be firm but polite; introduce yourself and say where you're from; make your message personal.
Wyoming House Judiciary Committee -
Dan Kirkbride (Chugwater)
Cell - (307) 331-2265
[email protected]
Mark Baker (Rock Springs)
Cell - (307) 371-5113
[email protected]
Bo Biteman (Ranchester)
Cell - (307) 763-7613
[email protected]
Mark Jennings (Sheridan)
Cell - (307) 461-0697
[email protected]
Jared Olsen (Cheyenne)
Cell - (307) 509-0242
[email protected]
Charles Pelkey (Laramie)
Cell - (307) 920-0542
[email protected]
Bill Pownall (Gillette)
Home - (307) 682-4148
[email protected]
Tim Salazar (Dubois)
Cell - (307) 220-1213
[email protected]
Nathan Winters (Thermopolis)
Home - (307) 864-3690
[email protected]
This is what you get when you use courts to force gay marriage on places that don't want it, and force non-essential businesses to either "bake or die".
When your side becomes unreasonable, don't be surprised when the other side does the exact same thing.
I guess lincoln shouldn't have been surprised when the south revolted after he "unreasonably" outlawed slavery....
- Sep 27, 2012
- 92,112
- 53,727
- 2,605
People should be able to do what they want with their property. Period.Im guessing you have the sick twisted opinions about race as well, that we shouldn't "use courts to force desegregation on places that don't want it, and force non-essential businesses to either "bake or die".From a friend in Wyoming:
The Wyoming State Legislature is considering a bill that, if passed, would become the most oppressive and wide-ranging anti-LGBT law in the nation. It would allow social workers to deny aid, teachers to not teach, health care workers to deny service not only to individuals that identify as LGBT, but their children as well. And that is just part of the bill... this bill tells our LGBT brothers and sisters that they are not worthy to receive services a straight cisgendered individual can receive.
HB-135 is scheduled to be voted upon by the Wyoming House Judiciary Committee this week, its first step toward becoming law. Please call and/or email members of this committee (contact info pasted below) and tell them to VOTE NO ON HB-135. No hate in the equality state!
Remember: Be firm but polite; introduce yourself and say where you're from; make your message personal.
Wyoming House Judiciary Committee -
Dan Kirkbride (Chugwater)
Cell - (307) 331-2265
[email protected]
Mark Baker (Rock Springs)
Cell - (307) 371-5113
[email protected]
Bo Biteman (Ranchester)
Cell - (307) 763-7613
[email protected]
Mark Jennings (Sheridan)
Cell - (307) 461-0697
[email protected]
Jared Olsen (Cheyenne)
Cell - (307) 509-0242
[email protected]
Charles Pelkey (Laramie)
Cell - (307) 920-0542
[email protected]
Bill Pownall (Gillette)
Home - (307) 682-4148
[email protected]
Tim Salazar (Dubois)
Cell - (307) 220-1213
[email protected]
Nathan Winters (Thermopolis)
Home - (307) 864-3690
[email protected]
This is what you get when you use courts to force gay marriage on places that don't want it, and force non-essential businesses to either "bake or die".
When your side becomes unreasonable, don't be surprised when the other side does the exact same thing.
I guess lincoln shouldn't have been surprised when the south revolted after he "unreasonably" outlawed slavery....
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,519
- 2,165
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #32
SCOTUS and federal and some state courts disagree with you, yeah?They may be entitled to it, but their rights do not automatically outweigh the rights of others, as in a right of a baker to not participate in a ceremony it finds sinful.
No one is forced to be a baker.
Everyone needs to make a living. Nothing anywhere in the Constitution suggests that it is in any way legitimate for government to compel anyone to give up any of their essential Constitutional rights as a condition of being allowed to do so.
You can't run a public barbershop offering its services to all and then deny services, if the PA laws say no.
Fair Housing Act requires landlords to follow basic laws.
This is not going to change.
Bob Blaylock
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #33
SCOTUS and federal and some state courts disagree with you, yeah?They may be entitled to it, but their rights do not automatically outweigh the rights of others, as in a right of a baker to not participate in a ceremony it finds sinful.
No one is forced to be a baker.
Everyone needs to make a living. Nothing anywhere in the Constitution suggests that it is in any way legitimate for government to compel anyone to give up any of their essential Constitutional rights as a condition of being allowed to do so.
You can't run a public barbershop offering its services to all and then deny services, if the PA laws say no.
Fair Housing Act requires landlords to follow basic laws.
This is not going to change.
We'll see.
We now have a resident, who, unlike his predecessor, does not appear to be inclined to take the sides of criminals and perverts over that of decent Americans, and he will likely get to pick enough Supreme Court Justices over his term to have a profound effect on the balance of that court.
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
They may be entitled to it, but their rights do not automatically outweigh the rights of others, as in a right of a baker to not participate in a ceremony it finds sinful.
No one is forced to be a baker.
Everyone needs to make a living. Nothing anywhere in the Constitution suggests that it is in any way legitimate for government to compel anyone to give up any of their essential Constitutional rights as a condition of being allowed to do so.
You're begging the question. You do not have a constitutional right to discriminate or deny someone equal protection under the law.
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,519
- 2,165
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #35
We will see if his picks are more centrist and nothing like an Alito or a Scalia. Trump, as strange and moody as they come, is not bothered by personal choices of lifestyle. He has shown that in his own life. So, yes, we will see.SCOTUS and federal and some state courts disagree with you, yeah?They may be entitled to it, but their rights do not automatically outweigh the rights of others, as in a right of a baker to not participate in a ceremony it finds sinful.
No one is forced to be a baker.
Everyone needs to make a living. Nothing anywhere in the Constitution suggests that it is in any way legitimate for government to compel anyone to give up any of their essential Constitutional rights as a condition of being allowed to do so.
You can't run a public barbershop offering its services to all and then deny services, if the PA laws say no.
Fair Housing Act requires landlords to follow basic laws.
This is not going to change.
We'll see.
We now have a resident, who, unlike his predecessor, does not appear to be inclined to take the sides of criminals and perverts over that of decent Americans, and he will likely get to pick enough Supreme Court Justices over his term to have a profound effect on the balance of that court.
people arent propertyPeople should be able to do what they want with their property. Period.Im guessing you have the sick twisted opinions about race as well, that we shouldn't "use courts to force desegregation on places that don't want it, and force non-essential businesses to either "bake or die".From a friend in Wyoming:
The Wyoming State Legislature is considering a bill that, if passed, would become the most oppressive and wide-ranging anti-LGBT law in the nation. It would allow social workers to deny aid, teachers to not teach, health care workers to deny service not only to individuals that identify as LGBT, but their children as well. And that is just part of the bill... this bill tells our LGBT brothers and sisters that they are not worthy to receive services a straight cisgendered individual can receive.
HB-135 is scheduled to be voted upon by the Wyoming House Judiciary Committee this week, its first step toward becoming law. Please call and/or email members of this committee (contact info pasted below) and tell them to VOTE NO ON HB-135. No hate in the equality state!
Remember: Be firm but polite; introduce yourself and say where you're from; make your message personal.
Wyoming House Judiciary Committee -
Dan Kirkbride (Chugwater)
Cell - (307) 331-2265
[email protected]
Mark Baker (Rock Springs)
Cell - (307) 371-5113
[email protected]
Bo Biteman (Ranchester)
Cell - (307) 763-7613
[email protected]
Mark Jennings (Sheridan)
Cell - (307) 461-0697
[email protected]
Jared Olsen (Cheyenne)
Cell - (307) 509-0242
[email protected]
Charles Pelkey (Laramie)
Cell - (307) 920-0542
[email protected]
Bill Pownall (Gillette)
Home - (307) 682-4148
[email protected]
Tim Salazar (Dubois)
Cell - (307) 220-1213
[email protected]
Nathan Winters (Thermopolis)
Home - (307) 864-3690
[email protected]
This is what you get when you use courts to force gay marriage on places that don't want it, and force non-essential businesses to either "bake or die".
When your side becomes unreasonable, don't be surprised when the other side does the exact same thing.
I guess lincoln shouldn't have been surprised when the south revolted after he "unreasonably" outlawed slavery....
- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,463
- 32,441
- 2,300
Im guessing you have the sick twisted opinions about race as well, that we shouldn't "use courts to force desegregation on places that don't want it, and force non-essential businesses to either "bake or die".From a friend in Wyoming:
The Wyoming State Legislature is considering a bill that, if passed, would become the most oppressive and wide-ranging anti-LGBT law in the nation. It would allow social workers to deny aid, teachers to not teach, health care workers to deny service not only to individuals that identify as LGBT, but their children as well. And that is just part of the bill... this bill tells our LGBT brothers and sisters that they are not worthy to receive services a straight cisgendered individual can receive.
HB-135 is scheduled to be voted upon by the Wyoming House Judiciary Committee this week, its first step toward becoming law. Please call and/or email members of this committee (contact info pasted below) and tell them to VOTE NO ON HB-135. No hate in the equality state!
Remember: Be firm but polite; introduce yourself and say where you're from; make your message personal.
Wyoming House Judiciary Committee -
Dan Kirkbride (Chugwater)
Cell - (307) 331-2265
[email protected]
Mark Baker (Rock Springs)
Cell - (307) 371-5113
[email protected]
Bo Biteman (Ranchester)
Cell - (307) 763-7613
[email protected]
Mark Jennings (Sheridan)
Cell - (307) 461-0697
[email protected]
Jared Olsen (Cheyenne)
Cell - (307) 509-0242
[email protected]
Charles Pelkey (Laramie)
Cell - (307) 920-0542
[email protected]
Bill Pownall (Gillette)
Home - (307) 682-4148
[email protected]
Tim Salazar (Dubois)
Cell - (307) 220-1213
[email protected]
Nathan Winters (Thermopolis)
Home - (307) 864-3690
[email protected]
This is what you get when you use courts to force gay marriage on places that don't want it, and force non-essential businesses to either "bake or die".
When your side becomes unreasonable, don't be surprised when the other side does the exact same thing.
I guess lincoln shouldn't have been surprised when the south revolted after he "unreasonably" outlawed slavery....
Not at all. Desegregation laws were perfectly constitutional and needed, as what was going on in the South was systemic economic discrimination, along with systemic political disenfranchisement, none of which is found in these non essential wedding transactions.
It was a bad court decision that allowed it to flourish, and that decsion has more in common with Roe and Obergfell than any other decisions out there, except maybe Dredd Scott.
- Sep 27, 2012
- 92,112
- 53,727
- 2,605
thank you captain obviouspeople arent propertyPeople should be able to do what they want with their property. Period.Im guessing you have the sick twisted opinions about race as well, that we shouldn't "use courts to force desegregation on places that don't want it, and force non-essential businesses to either "bake or die".From a friend in Wyoming:
The Wyoming State Legislature is considering a bill that, if passed, would become the most oppressive and wide-ranging anti-LGBT law in the nation. It would allow social workers to deny aid, teachers to not teach, health care workers to deny service not only to individuals that identify as LGBT, but their children as well. And that is just part of the bill... this bill tells our LGBT brothers and sisters that they are not worthy to receive services a straight cisgendered individual can receive.
HB-135 is scheduled to be voted upon by the Wyoming House Judiciary Committee this week, its first step toward becoming law. Please call and/or email members of this committee (contact info pasted below) and tell them to VOTE NO ON HB-135. No hate in the equality state!
Remember: Be firm but polite; introduce yourself and say where you're from; make your message personal.
Wyoming House Judiciary Committee -
Dan Kirkbride (Chugwater)
Cell - (307) 331-2265
[email protected]
Mark Baker (Rock Springs)
Cell - (307) 371-5113
[email protected]
Bo Biteman (Ranchester)
Cell - (307) 763-7613
[email protected]
Mark Jennings (Sheridan)
Cell - (307) 461-0697
[email protected]
Jared Olsen (Cheyenne)
Cell - (307) 509-0242
[email protected]
Charles Pelkey (Laramie)
Cell - (307) 920-0542
[email protected]
Bill Pownall (Gillette)
Home - (307) 682-4148
[email protected]
Tim Salazar (Dubois)
Cell - (307) 220-1213
[email protected]
Nathan Winters (Thermopolis)
Home - (307) 864-3690
[email protected]
This is what you get when you use courts to force gay marriage on places that don't want it, and force non-essential businesses to either "bake or die".
When your side becomes unreasonable, don't be surprised when the other side does the exact same thing.
I guess lincoln shouldn't have been surprised when the south revolted after he "unreasonably" outlawed slavery....
doesn't seem to be obvious to you nazisthank you captain obviouspeople arent propertyPeople should be able to do what they want with their property. Period.Im guessing you have the sick twisted opinions about race as well, that we shouldn't "use courts to force desegregation on places that don't want it, and force non-essential businesses to either "bake or die".From a friend in Wyoming:
The Wyoming State Legislature is considering a bill that, if passed, would become the most oppressive and wide-ranging anti-LGBT law in the nation. It would allow social workers to deny aid, teachers to not teach, health care workers to deny service not only to individuals that identify as LGBT, but their children as well. And that is just part of the bill... this bill tells our LGBT brothers and sisters that they are not worthy to receive services a straight cisgendered individual can receive.
HB-135 is scheduled to be voted upon by the Wyoming House Judiciary Committee this week, its first step toward becoming law. Please call and/or email members of this committee (contact info pasted below) and tell them to VOTE NO ON HB-135. No hate in the equality state!
Remember: Be firm but polite; introduce yourself and say where you're from; make your message personal.
Wyoming House Judiciary Committee -
Dan Kirkbride (Chugwater)
Cell - (307) 331-2265
[email protected]
Mark Baker (Rock Springs)
Cell - (307) 371-5113
[email protected]
Bo Biteman (Ranchester)
Cell - (307) 763-7613
[email protected]
Mark Jennings (Sheridan)
Cell - (307) 461-0697
[email protected]
Jared Olsen (Cheyenne)
Cell - (307) 509-0242
[email protected]
Charles Pelkey (Laramie)
Cell - (307) 920-0542
[email protected]
Bill Pownall (Gillette)
Home - (307) 682-4148
[email protected]
Tim Salazar (Dubois)
Cell - (307) 220-1213
[email protected]
Nathan Winters (Thermopolis)
Home - (307) 864-3690
[email protected]
This is what you get when you use courts to force gay marriage on places that don't want it, and force non-essential businesses to either "bake or die".
When your side becomes unreasonable, don't be surprised when the other side does the exact same thing.
I guess lincoln shouldn't have been surprised when the south revolted after he "unreasonably" outlawed slavery....
Bob Blaylock
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #40
You're begging the question. You do not have a constitutional right to discriminate or deny someone equal protection under the law.
It is your side that is making up “Constitutional rights” that are nowhere stated nor implied in the Constitution, and using them as an excuse to violate rights that are explicitly stated or strongly implied in the Constitution.
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 103
- Views
- 472
- Replies
- 157
- Views
- 758
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8087
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 471
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-