Skynet
Member
- Jun 8, 2011
- 456
- 22
- 16
TYou're assuming the UN is relevent and can actually accomplish something other than wealth redistribution. I don't agree with that.
the UN is relevant. dont you think the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan would have been easier and cost less US money and US lives has the UN been involved? or do you enjoy the US playing world police and always footing the bill?
It's becoming clearer that you really don't know what you're talking about.
explain how being allies with other countries and utilizing the UN isnt relevent?
the UN has taken over control of the Libya operation so we dont have to. I'm sure that was a terrible decision.
your isolationist theory isnt valid with the global economy of today.