wtf? dad wont take kid to mickyd's...shrink says he abused kid

[strollingbones]

A Manhattan dad is not lovin’ McDonald’s right now.

Attorney David Schorr slapped a court-appointed shrink with a defamation lawsuit for telling the judge deciding a custody battle with his estranged wife that he was an unfit parent — for refusing to take his son to the fast food joint for dinner.

“You’d think it was sexual molestation,” Schorr, 43, told The Post Thursday. “I am just floored by it.”

Schorr says in his Manhattan Supreme Court suit that E. 97th Street psychiatrist Marilyn Schiller filed a report saying he was “wholly incapable of taking care of his son” and should be denied his weekend visitation over the greasy burger ban.

Schorr, a corporate attorney turned consultant with degrees from NYU and Oxford University, had planned to take his 4-year-old son to their usual restaurant, the Corner Café on Third Avenue, for his weekly Tuesday night visitation last week.

Dad ?unfit parent for refusing son McDonald?s? | New York Post


so now the father is an abuser ??? and may lose visitation ....cause he refused to take the kid to mickey d's and the kid went hungry for the night....my kid would have been hungry and hurting...cause i would have ....o horror of horrors....spanked him too

 

[TemplarKormac]

Geez. Fire the psychologist. Oh wait, I wonder how fat she is from eating all of that Mickey D's? They'll have trouble getting her out of the door.

 

[Pauli007001]

It's NYC.
They ban fat but call you a child abuser for not feeding your kid fat?

Good ole fashioned liberalism.

When I said that this would happen, post obamacare, government forcing you to buy a product, the libs said it couldn't happen!

My guess, he will lose the case.

If he wins, it's a war on women.

Just as I predicted.

Liberal insanity, inspired by Papa Doc Obama!

 

[ScienceRocks]

Just nuts.

 

[JOSweetHeart]

Not that it really means anything, but I wonder why the man would not take his kid to the place? What if he did not have the money for it that night? Why should the man be punished for that?

God bless you and him and his son always!!!

Holly

 

[Pauli007001]

Not that it really means anything, but I wonder why the man would not take his kid to the place? What if he did not have the money for it that night? Why should the man be punished for that?

God bless you and him and his son always!!!

Holly

A corporate lawyer, turned consultant, with degrees from NYU and oxford.
Not a money issue I think.
More likely a moral/health decision.

Liberals hate families.
Destroy the father, destroy the family.
Liberals regard families as a threat to their obamessiah.
But claim that families are tribal , xenophobic, racist , patriarchal, obsolete and cause the war on women.
Liberal NYC and stupid liberal laws.
Who woulda thunk it!

 

[JOSweetHeart]

^^^ May the man come out the winner when the dust finally settles.

God bless you and him and his boy always!!!

Holly