WSJ reporters told to cover Trump fairly

[Brynmr]

"Wall Street Journal editor in chief Gerard Baker told his reporters Monday the paper would not abandon objectivity in its coverage of President Donald Trump, and directed them to find work somewhere else if they want to adopt a more oppositional tone."


WSJ reporters upset because their editor wants them to cover Trump fairly

 

[JohnnyApplesack]

"Wall Street Journal editor in chief Gerard Baker told his reporters Monday the paper would not abandon objectivity in its coverage of President Donald Trump, and directed them to find work somewhere else if they want to adopt a more oppositional tone."


WSJ reporters upset because their editor wants them to cover Trump fairly

since Rupert bought that rag it's only gotten worse, yellow journalism for the investor class

 

[TheOldSchool]

"Wall Street Journal editor in chief Gerard Baker told his reporters Monday the paper would not abandon objectivity in its coverage of President Donald Trump, and directed them to find work somewhere else if they want to adopt a more oppositional tone."


WSJ reporters upset because their editor wants them to cover Trump fairly

Getting hard for them to stay objective with this train crash going on, huh?

 

[rdean]

And here is a brand new Trump lie from today's press conference. Trump said he didn't know anyone who had contact with the Russians. Hello, Flynn had contact with the Russians. Duh!.

 

[mamooth]

More uber-PC crying from the corrupt Trump party hacks. They believe that when Trump lies, it should be forbidden to point out he's lying.

That's what reporters are angry about. They're being forced to lie by WSJ management, forced to say that Trump's lies are just differences in opinion.

And all the Trump fans here all agree with that PC censorship policy. Most of the Trump-commies here would go so far as to say that it should be illegal for any journalist to point out when Trump lies, and that all such honest journalists should be sent to the gulag, if not executed.

What's the different between Trump-fans and Stalinists? None, that I can see.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

And the first thing, the WSJ lies about the intelligence services keeping intelligence from the President.

 

[Brynmr]

More uber-PC crying from the corrupt Trump party hacks. They believe that when Trump lies, it should be forbidden to point out he's lying.

This comment is precisely what Baker is trying to avoid. And no, I don't expect an intellectual giant like yourself to understand this.

 

[Brynmr]

What's the different between Trump-fans and Stalinists? None, that I can see.

You won't find work under Baker's watch.