WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE A FUTURE PERSONAL INVESTMENT ACCOUNT,instead of government ...

Would you like government imposed social security,or personal control?


  • Total voters
    43
  • Poll closed .
Dispute my plan,or get lost.

128713931412710865.jpg
 
As more and more Baby Boomers retire, The Left is going to try and leverage the delta between the Baby Boomers who are better off and those that don't have the size of the home that wealthier baby boomers have. The 'Have Not Baby Boomers' will be those that depended on The Government.

Any Questions???
 
Well back to the original post if we may. I would prefer to have a combination of personal retirement account equating to 60% contribution and insurance policy for the remaining 40%, in event I should die, so my wife and children would receive benefits plus the personal contribution account tax free. Just a dream, because the government would never survive if their ponzi scheme was shut down.
 
Well,my system is not only citizen controlled,but eliminates an agency altogether and eliminates the FDR socialist redistribution of wealth to the ones who don't earn it,and money completely out of the hands of the government for misuses.
 
Heres the question,board.
would you like to continually be raped by imposed FDR grade communist personal redistribution tax called SOCIAL SECURITY,where the government can redistribute to illegal aliens,payments to alcohol and drug addicts,and self inflicted maladies...

Or...

PERSONAL FUTURE SAVINGS INVESTMENT ACCOUNTS,where only US CITIZENS are able to participate ELECTIVELY,not imposed,whereas the US CITIZEN has complete control of their financial future without disbursement or interferance from the government?

1.my proposal i have thoughtfully created grants the elimination of the SSA,and the general fund.At eighteen years of age,each us citizen will be advised of the creation of a future citizen investment fund account.

2.each account will be created based on each individuals SSN.thats the account number. And options are advised-
A.it will be a US TREASURY held money market account with an APY of 3%.

3.the citizen,having full control of their future,will have the option to either VEST or NOT VEST.
and,also...
the frequency,amount,and type of vesting deposit,which the citizen can change at any time.
after five years,any citizen can make a withdrawal,and start reinvesting.after all,citizens,not government,will have control.
after age 65,citizens are fully vested,abd can receive mobthly draws off their investment without limitation to any amount of privately earned income.

Do you like it?

I am in full support of some sort of compromise between the Current abysmal Return of SS, and the UN-Predictability of Some other Investments. Seems to me there are plenty of very Safe Investment Vehicles, that would surely out Perform SS as far as Return for Money Invested.

The US government has proven they can not be trusted with the So Called SS Trust fund. I am all for getting as much money as we can out of those fucking fools hands.
 
Mr.main,it needs to be eliminated,and put back into the hands ofcitizens to invest and have full control over their future.
 
Get off my thread.
government only holds the accounts citizen controlled.



Well,my system is not only citizen controlled,but eliminates an agency altogether and eliminates the FDR socialist redistribution of wealth to the ones who don't earn it,and money completely out of the hands of the government for misuses.


I don't think anybody needs, to debate you....you're debating yourself here.
 
Ask that question to democrat politicians and they will scream that they want it all and no stinkin citizen should have any control of their FICA taxes. When president Bush suggested that citizens should have control of a tiny portion of their Social Security and be able to pass it on to their heirs if they do not live long enough to collect the democrats in congress went crazy. They convinced Black families to be against the initiative even though Black men have the greatest statistical likelyhood of not collecting on the FICA taxes that were confiscated from their wages all their working lives.
 
When I retire, my SS check will be enough to pay my basic survival expenses, before I ever have to touch my 2 pensions. I am very glad the government took that money out of my check (and I never really missed it) all those years.
 
Mr.main,it needs to be eliminated,and put back into the hands ofcitizens to invest and have full control over their future.

But that does have to be done slowly and incrementally just as it has accrued to avoid creating terrible hardship for poorer Senior Citizens that the government made dependent on Social Security. But yes, the government could provide incentive and help and protection for people to set up their own private investment accounts and gradually phase out Social Security.
 
Fox,my system and its transitions avoid disaster at all levels for real recepients before they become private citizen future investors. All checks and balances are in place.
 
Fox,my system and its transitions avoid disaster at all levels for real recepients before they become private citizen future investors. All checks and balances are in place.

Unfortunately Ed, your system is not getting wide publicity. And even if it is out there, it is being drowned out by the structured and organized caterwauling of the leftists who are demonizing Republicans and conservatives as evil selfish greedy people who want to take away the old people's social security and throw them out on the street.

Until we can educate the few who still have enough brain cells to think on their own that there is a muich more humane, effective, and intelligent way to take care of those old people, all efforts at any kind of reform are doomed to fail.
 
Get off my thread.
government only holds the accounts citizen controlled.



Well,my system is not only citizen controlled,but eliminates an agency altogether and eliminates the FDR socialist redistribution of wealth to the ones who don't earn it,and money completely out of the hands of the government for misuses.


I don't think anybody needs, to debate you....you're debating yourself here.

Not the first time that his posts have been schizy. Frankly, I wish he would actually explain his "plans" but I doubt he can.

Google "Ed Spacer" and you can see why he doesn't make much sense.
 

Forum List

Back
Top