Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You disagreeing with them does not make them inaccurate.It would help if conservatives would just use a dictionary or open a book occasionally. Definitions for those terms already exist.For instance...
Capitalism: Means of production (MOP) owned and controlled by citizens.
Communism: MOP owned and controlled by government.
Socialism: MOP owned and controlled by the employees/workers.
Fascism: MOP owned by citizens, but partially or fully directed by government.
Democratic Socialism: ???
Thoughts?
Some definitions are rather subjective and inaccurate.
For instance...
Capitalism: Means of production (MOP) owned and controlled by citizens.
Communism: MOP owned and controlled by government.
Socialism: MOP owned and controlled by the employees/workers.
Fascism: MOP owned by citizens, but partially or fully directed by government.
Democratic Socialism: ???
Thoughts?
It would help if liberals did that too. All their gyrations around socialism are getting rather comical.It would help if conservatives would just use a dictionary or open a book occasionally. Definitions for those terms already exist.For instance...
Capitalism: Means of production (MOP) owned and controlled by citizens.
Communism: MOP owned and controlled by government.
Socialism: MOP owned and controlled by the employees/workers.
Fascism: MOP owned by citizens, but partially or fully directed by government.
Democratic Socialism: ???
Thoughts?
It would help if liberals did that too. All their gyrations around socialism are getting rather comical.It would help if conservatives would just use a dictionary or open a book occasionally. Definitions for those terms already exist.For instance...
Capitalism: Means of production (MOP) owned and controlled by citizens.
Communism: MOP owned and controlled by government.
Socialism: MOP owned and controlled by the employees/workers.
Fascism: MOP owned by citizens, but partially or fully directed by government.
Democratic Socialism: ???
Thoughts?
It would help if liberals did that too. All their gyrations around socialism are getting rather comical.It would help if conservatives would just use a dictionary or open a book occasionally. Definitions for those terms already exist.For instance...
Capitalism: Means of production (MOP) owned and controlled by citizens.
Communism: MOP owned and controlled by government.
Socialism: MOP owned and controlled by the employees/workers.
Fascism: MOP owned by citizens, but partially or fully directed by government.
Democratic Socialism: ???
Thoughts?
Lol, that's pretty funny.
Why don't you define socialism for us.
You disagreeing with them does not make them inaccurate.
LMAO!!!It would help if liberals did that too. All their gyrations around socialism are getting rather comical.It would help if conservatives would just use a dictionary or open a book occasionally. Definitions for those terms already exist.For instance...
Capitalism: Means of production (MOP) owned and controlled by citizens.
Communism: MOP owned and controlled by government.
Socialism: MOP owned and controlled by the employees/workers.
Fascism: MOP owned by citizens, but partially or fully directed by government.
Democratic Socialism: ???
Thoughts?
Lol, that's pretty funny.
Why don't you define socialism for us.
You can't read a dictionary?
So Hitler offing all the Jews had nothing to do with racism then? That whole Master race thing was all just so they could share uniforms more easily?You disagreeing with them does not make them inaccurate.
Google socialism, fascism and capitalism and I bet you'll find multitudes of definitions. Yes, there is a subjective nature to it.
I read one Oxford definition of fascism in which the author mentioned racist ideals as being a part of its ideology. The only problem is that, the original fascist "manifesto" as written by the original fascists (Mussolini and Gentile), didn't mention a word about race. So, yea, sometimes mainstream definitions are "inaccurate". And let's also remember that some folks that want to define a concept do so with a political ax to grind.
For instance...
Capitalism: Means of production (MOP) owned and controlled by citizens.
Communism: MOP owned and controlled by government.
Socialism: MOP owned and controlled by the employees/workers.
Fascism: MOP owned by citizens, but partially or fully directed by government.
Democratic Socialism: ???
Thoughts?
LMAO!!!It would help if liberals did that too. All their gyrations around socialism are getting rather comical.It would help if conservatives would just use a dictionary or open a book occasionally. Definitions for those terms already exist.For instance...
Capitalism: Means of production (MOP) owned and controlled by citizens.
Communism: MOP owned and controlled by government.
Socialism: MOP owned and controlled by the employees/workers.
Fascism: MOP owned by citizens, but partially or fully directed by government.
Democratic Socialism: ???
Thoughts?
Lol, that's pretty funny.
Why don't you define socialism for us.
You can't read a dictionary?
You don't know what it means so you're dodging!
Too fuckin' funny kid!
So Hitler offing all the Jews had nothing to do with racism then? That whole Master race thing was all just so they could share uniforms more easily?You disagreeing with them does not make them inaccurate.
Google socialism, fascism and capitalism and I bet you'll find multitudes of definitions. Yes, there is a subjective nature to it.
I read one Oxford definition of fascism in which the author mentioned racist ideals as being a part of its ideology. The only problem is that, the original fascist "manifesto" as written by the original fascists (Mussolini and Gentile), didn't mention a word about race. So, yea, sometimes mainstream definitions are "inaccurate". And let's also remember that some folks that want to define a concept do so with a political ax to grind.
Nope, you're out of excuses.So Hitler offing all the Jews had nothing to do with racism then? That whole Master race thing was all just so they could share uniforms more easily?You disagreeing with them does not make them inaccurate.
Google socialism, fascism and capitalism and I bet you'll find multitudes of definitions. Yes, there is a subjective nature to it.
I read one Oxford definition of fascism in which the author mentioned racist ideals as being a part of its ideology. The only problem is that, the original fascist "manifesto" as written by the original fascists (Mussolini and Gentile), didn't mention a word about race. So, yea, sometimes mainstream definitions are "inaccurate". And let's also remember that some folks that want to define a concept do so with a political ax to grind.
You're out of your depth.
Nope, you're out of excuses.So Hitler offing all the Jews had nothing to do with racism then? That whole Master race thing was all just so they could share uniforms more easily?You disagreeing with them does not make them inaccurate.
Google socialism, fascism and capitalism and I bet you'll find multitudes of definitions. Yes, there is a subjective nature to it.
I read one Oxford definition of fascism in which the author mentioned racist ideals as being a part of its ideology. The only problem is that, the original fascist "manifesto" as written by the original fascists (Mussolini and Gentile), didn't mention a word about race. So, yea, sometimes mainstream definitions are "inaccurate". And let's also remember that some folks that want to define a concept do so with a political ax to grind.
You're out of your depth.