Women Should Really Think Twice About False Accusations

Why should it be reported immediately?

Like every other crime...to preserve evidence including peoples memories - and to prevent the perpetrator from committing the same crime against some else.

Waiting 40 years then declaring a crime has been committed is disingenuine.

"Oh officer..my house was broken into and all my property stolen...40 years ago"!
Nope. This current crisis the Catholic church is dealing with is a great example. Should these pervert priests be let off the hook for raping children because it happened 40 years ago? Do you support these perverts because the claims were not immediately reported?

They can't defend themselves, this came up because they want to be able to sue till 50 years of age, today this is nonsense, they should come forward right away or forever deal with it. Same with women today.
I dont think there should be a statue of limitations on crimes that involve deep emotional stress or PTSD. Not allowing the victims to come to grips with their experience before reporting it is wrong.

I have to disagree.
Thats your right.

So if someone raped you and you mentally could not tolerate speaking to someone about it then you would have no problem that your rapist was running for mayor years later?
 
I do believe from now on women should report any abuse right away to the police and go to a hospital and or if at work report it right away, but it can mean being fired, but get an attorney and sue.

Yeah. I agree. Waiting three decades to spin a story is pretty bad.

In those days women didn't say anything esp to ones parents. They kept it hush hush.
I'm a decade older than her and even in my "day" we told our friends. The days of a rape victim being "ruined" and "damaged goods" no longer acceptable to respectable men, were pretty much over.

If I had a close call when I was out doing something I was forbidden to do, like attend an unsupervised party where everyone would be drinking, I most likely would not have told any adults.
 
Um....attempted forcible rape isn't 'fair', Rich.

Attempted rape is and has always been a crime. It should be reported to the police immediately.
Why should it be reported immediately?

Like every other crime...to preserve evidence including peoples memories - and to prevent the perpetrator from committing the same crime against some else.

Waiting 40 years then declaring a crime has been committed is disingenuine.

"Oh officer..my house was broken into and all my property stolen...40 years ago"!
Nope. This current crisis the Catholic church is dealing with is a great example. Should these pervert priests be let off the hook for raping children because it happened 40 years ago? Do you support these perverts because the claims were not immediately reported?

First, why didn't they report this to the police immediately?

Second, having been raised Catholic I never witnessed any Priests or Brothers molesting anyone.

Third, if any Priest or Brother had tried to molest me I would have kicked him in the balls and ran to the police station to report it. Why didn't they?

It takes two to tango.
I would assume shame or fear.

That was a pretty dumb statement. Why would you witness such an event?

Probably because they arent you. Some people like you and I would aggressively defend themselves. Others dont. The perverts sense this almost instinctively.

It may take two to tango but it only takes one person to take advantage of someone else.
 
Most rapes go unreported. Many out of shame or fear they won't be believed or attacked.

Even with Ford's account being from 2012 with therapist notes backing it, even with one of the people she cites as being in the room admitting to binge drinking, blackouts, holes in his memories, and trying to hookup with drunk girls, even with Ford passing a lie detector test administered by a former FBI agent....

She's still attacked and not believed.

Where, oh-where, would women get the idea that they wouldn't be believed or attacked if they come forward?
I don't see a FBI giving a Poly back then for a supposed rape. Four people as stated in the prior report, and does not recall the address makes the whole story strange. This has got to be a blocking story for the Mid terms.
I find the fact that her witness instead of denying the incident occurred claimed he didnt recall the incident. Thats typically done to limit legal exposure.

Yeah, Marc Judge was *very* careful with his replies. He didn't claim it didn't happen. Instead he insists he had 'no recollection'. Those exact words, repeatedly.

This from a man who admits that at the very kinds of highschool parties that Ford alleges she was attacked at, Judge drank so much that he blacked out and had huge holes in his memory.

I went to many High School parties as a kid and never attacked anyone. However, someone could come out now 35 years later say I did and there's little recourse I have other than to say I didn't.

Seems fair right?
Ah so your thing is that women should never mention they were attacked unless they can prove it in court?

They should report it to the police. Even if they can't prove it, it will alert the police that the accused is a potential rapist or child molester.

Besides which it will help support their accusations that they choose to make 40 years later when the accused is being consider for the SC.
 
It doesn't if you're nice to 65 women. You still don't get a free pass on attempted forcible rape with *anyone*.
They have had the accusations since july. So if the democrats could've stopped his nomination. Before now, we would know nothing about this. I call bullshit.

Ford asked to remain confidential. Feinstein honored her request, didn't release her name publicly and instead turned over the letter to the FBI.

And passing a polygraph does add weight to her claims.

Nah...

Not buying into the polygraph at all. Those can be soft-shoe'd.

When was the polygraph administered? Who gave the polygraph? What questions were asked? Who interpreted the results?
Nobody will ever know, probably never happened.

Nothing says 'probably never happened' like passing a polygraph test.
Excuse me, never happened.
 
Attempted rape is and has always been a crime. It should be reported to the police immediately.
Why should it be reported immediately?

Like every other crime...to preserve evidence including peoples memories - and to prevent the perpetrator from committing the same crime against some else.

Waiting 40 years then declaring a crime has been committed is disingenuine.

"Oh officer..my house was broken into and all my property stolen...40 years ago"!
Nope. This current crisis the Catholic church is dealing with is a great example. Should these pervert priests be let off the hook for raping children because it happened 40 years ago? Do you support these perverts because the claims were not immediately reported?

First, why didn't they report this to the police immediately?

Second, having been raised Catholic I never witnessed any Priests or Brothers molesting anyone.

Third, if any Priest or Brother had tried to molest me I would have kicked him in the balls and ran to the police station to report it. Why didn't they?

It takes two to tango.
I would assume shame or fear.

That was a pretty dumb statement. Why would you witness such an event?

Probably because they arent you. Some people like you and I would aggressively defend themselves. Others dont. The perverts sense this almost instinctively.

It may take two to tango but it only takes one person to take advantage of someone else.

In life people have to stand up for themselves.

If they do not, then they ONLY HAVE THEMSELVES TO BLAME!
 
It seems to be turning into a full blown fad, and frankly, they could find down the road that such a climate affects their employment possibilities.

I mean, if I were hiring in the current climate, I would be tres-reluctant to hire women for any top positions, particularly those working closely with myself.

Just a thought, ladies.
Men should really think twice about sexually assaulting women. Why don't we see that being said instead?

Well men should not even think about it as far as I'm concerned.
------------------------------------- my advice to Men , especially Young White men would be to just stay away from women as much as they can Penny . Its easy , VP Mike Pence does it .

Mike Pence does not have dinner with anyone, he talks to women though. I would not like my husband having a meeting over lunch somewhere, that can be done at work.
 
Why should it be reported immediately?

Like every other crime...to preserve evidence including peoples memories - and to prevent the perpetrator from committing the same crime against some else.

Waiting 40 years then declaring a crime has been committed is disingenuine.

"Oh officer..my house was broken into and all my property stolen...40 years ago"!
Nope. This current crisis the Catholic church is dealing with is a great example. Should these pervert priests be let off the hook for raping children because it happened 40 years ago? Do you support these perverts because the claims were not immediately reported?

First, why didn't they report this to the police immediately?

Second, having been raised Catholic I never witnessed any Priests or Brothers molesting anyone.

Third, if any Priest or Brother had tried to molest me I would have kicked him in the balls and ran to the police station to report it. Why didn't they?

It takes two to tango.
I would assume shame or fear.

That was a pretty dumb statement. Why would you witness such an event?

Probably because they arent you. Some people like you and I would aggressively defend themselves. Others dont. The perverts sense this almost instinctively.

It may take two to tango but it only takes one person to take advantage of someone else.

In life people have to stand up for themselves.

If they do not, then they ONLY HAVE THEMSELVES TO BLAME!
I agree people have to stand up for themselves. However, I dont agree with criminals getting away with their crimes because said person didnt stand up for themselves.
 
They have had the accusations since july. So if the democrats could've stopped his nomination. Before now, we would know nothing about this. I call bullshit.

Ford asked to remain confidential. Feinstein honored her request, didn't release her name publicly and instead turned over the letter to the FBI.

And passing a polygraph does add weight to her claims.

Nah...

Not buying into the polygraph at all. Those can be soft-shoe'd.

When was the polygraph administered? Who gave the polygraph? What questions were asked? Who interpreted the results?
Nobody will ever know, probably never happened.

Nothing says 'probably never happened' like passing a polygraph test.
Excuse me, never happened.

Her polygraph test and eye witness account say otherwise. With Marc Judge (the other person in the room by Ford's account) having already admitted that he not only attended the kind of parties that Ford describes, but got black out drunk, had huge holes in his memory and would routinely try to hook up with drunk girls.

WIth Judge refusing to say it didn't happen. Merely carefully repeating the same phrase over and over in every rendition: that he has 'no recollection'. Those exact words from an admitted binge drinker with blackouts.

She should be heard. Publicly. Under oath. Before Congress.
 
Ford asked to remain confidential. Feinstein honored her request, didn't release her name publicly and instead turned over the letter to the FBI.

And passing a polygraph does add weight to her claims.

Nah...

Not buying into the polygraph at all. Those can be soft-shoe'd.

When was the polygraph administered? Who gave the polygraph? What questions were asked? Who interpreted the results?
Nobody will ever know, probably never happened.

Nothing says 'probably never happened' like passing a polygraph test.
Excuse me, never happened.

Her polygraph test and eye witness account say otherwise. With Marc Judge (the other person in the room by Ford's account) having already admitted that he not only attended the kind of parties that Ford describes, but got black out drunk, had huge holes in his memory and would routinely try to hook up with drunk girls.

WIth Judge refusing to say it didn't happen. Merely carefully repeating the same phrase over and over in every rendition: that he has 'no recollection'.

She should be heard. Publicly. Under oath. Before Congress.

I'm completely happy (100%) with her being heard...under oath...before congress!

However, I do not believe her.
 
Like every other crime...to preserve evidence including peoples memories - and to prevent the perpetrator from committing the same crime against some else.

Waiting 40 years then declaring a crime has been committed is disingenuine.

"Oh officer..my house was broken into and all my property stolen...40 years ago"!
Nope. This current crisis the Catholic church is dealing with is a great example. Should these pervert priests be let off the hook for raping children because it happened 40 years ago? Do you support these perverts because the claims were not immediately reported?

They can't defend themselves, this came up because they want to be able to sue till 50 years of age, today this is nonsense, they should come forward right away or forever deal with it. Same with women today.
I dont think there should be a statue of limitations on crimes that involve deep emotional stress or PTSD. Not allowing the victims to come to grips with their experience before reporting it is wrong.

I have to disagree.
Thats your right.

So if someone raped you and you mentally could not tolerate speaking to someone about it then you would have no problem that your rapist was running for mayor years later?


Why do you keep saying "Rape"?

Kavanaugh is not being accused of rape. He's being accused of molestation. There is a HUGE difference.

Rape is a heiniuos crime that should be punishable by death (IMO).

Most of the accusations being leveled nowadays are more attributable to men being romantic clutz's.
 
It seems to be turning into a full blown fad, and frankly, they could find down the road that such a climate affects their employment possibilities.

I mean, if I were hiring in the current climate, I would be tres-reluctant to hire women for any top positions, particularly those working closely with myself.

Just a thought, ladies.
That's it, Billy, threaten us.

No threat. Just an observation of the survival element in human nature.
Bullshit.
Here's another idea for you: Tell your male employees to show some respect for the women that work around them and to stay out of their pantaloons, physically and figuratively.

Is that really too much to ask?

During my 28 years as an employee with a City, personally knew of THREE men who couldn't keep their hands off the rare female employee, end result that two of them were FIRED and third one suspended without pay.

One had taken a photo of his dick and sent it to her with a note, result FIRED!

Another male idiot was stroking his dick in a company truck in a public while starring at women, got caught, result FIRED! I still vividly remember the Human Resources Director come barreling into the crew meeting room using his hand telling him to follow him out of the room NOW, many saw it and wondered why he was so mad. Never saw the fella again as he was quickly fired and escorted off the place with a police officer.

The third idiot put his hands on her large boobs and stroked them, squeezing and so on, result long suspension without pay.

Why? because the women stood up for themselves, reported it to the Human Resources office. I knew the two women very well as I worked with them for years, they were the kind of women who doesn't take crap from anyone.
 
Like every other crime...to preserve evidence including peoples memories - and to prevent the perpetrator from committing the same crime against some else.

Waiting 40 years then declaring a crime has been committed is disingenuine.

"Oh officer..my house was broken into and all my property stolen...40 years ago"!
Nope. This current crisis the Catholic church is dealing with is a great example. Should these pervert priests be let off the hook for raping children because it happened 40 years ago? Do you support these perverts because the claims were not immediately reported?

First, why didn't they report this to the police immediately?

Second, having been raised Catholic I never witnessed any Priests or Brothers molesting anyone.

Third, if any Priest or Brother had tried to molest me I would have kicked him in the balls and ran to the police station to report it. Why didn't they?

It takes two to tango.
I would assume shame or fear.

That was a pretty dumb statement. Why would you witness such an event?

Probably because they arent you. Some people like you and I would aggressively defend themselves. Others dont. The perverts sense this almost instinctively.

It may take two to tango but it only takes one person to take advantage of someone else.

In life people have to stand up for themselves.

If they do not, then they ONLY HAVE THEMSELVES TO BLAME!
I agree people have to stand up for themselves. However, I dont agree with criminals getting away with their crimes because said person didnt stand up for themselves.
-------------------------------------- they should stand up IMMEDIATEDLY , otherwise its probably BS 36 years later . Course , it'll probably work but that just shows how far the USA has fallen Ace .
 
It doesn't if you're nice to 65 women. You still don't get a free pass on attempted forcible rape with *anyone*.
They have had the accusations since july. So if the democrats could've stopped his nomination. Before now, we would know nothing about this. I call bullshit.

Ford asked to remain confidential. Feinstein honored her request, didn't release her name publicly and instead turned over the letter to the FBI.

And passing a polygraph does add weight to her claims.

Nah...

Not buying into the polygraph at all. Those can be soft-shoe'd.

When was the polygraph administered? Who gave the polygraph? What questions were asked? Who interpreted the results?
Nobody will ever know, probably never happened.

You are right, no one can be sure, his buddy was a drunk , even wrote a book about the drunk school days. Birds of feather flock together.
Wow, a couple of teenagers in the 80's drinking alcohol. They must of been badasses, lol. My God who didn't drink back then?
 
Nope. This current crisis the Catholic church is dealing with is a great example. Should these pervert priests be let off the hook for raping children because it happened 40 years ago? Do you support these perverts because the claims were not immediately reported?

They can't defend themselves, this came up because they want to be able to sue till 50 years of age, today this is nonsense, they should come forward right away or forever deal with it. Same with women today.
I dont think there should be a statue of limitations on crimes that involve deep emotional stress or PTSD. Not allowing the victims to come to grips with their experience before reporting it is wrong.

I have to disagree.
Thats your right.

So if someone raped you and you mentally could not tolerate speaking to someone about it then you would have no problem that your rapist was running for mayor years later?


Why do you keep saying "Rape"?

Kavanaugh is not being accused of rape. He's being accused of molestation. There is a HUGE difference.

Rape is a heiniuos crime that should be punishable by death (IMO).

Most of the accusations being leveled nowadays are more attributable to men being romantic clutz's.
I wasnt talking about Kavanaugh.
 
Nope. This current crisis the Catholic church is dealing with is a great example. Should these pervert priests be let off the hook for raping children because it happened 40 years ago? Do you support these perverts because the claims were not immediately reported?

They can't defend themselves, this came up because they want to be able to sue till 50 years of age, today this is nonsense, they should come forward right away or forever deal with it. Same with women today.
I dont think there should be a statue of limitations on crimes that involve deep emotional stress or PTSD. Not allowing the victims to come to grips with their experience before reporting it is wrong.

I have to disagree.
Thats your right.

So if someone raped you and you mentally could not tolerate speaking to someone about it then you would have no problem that your rapist was running for mayor years later?


Why do you keep saying "Rape"?

Kavanaugh is not being accused of rape. He's being accused of molestation. There is a HUGE difference.

Rape is a heiniuos crime that should be punishable by death (IMO).

Most of the accusations being leveled nowadays are more attributable to men being romantic clutz's.

If what she says is true , he tried to rape her.
 
Nope. This current crisis the Catholic church is dealing with is a great example. Should these pervert priests be let off the hook for raping children because it happened 40 years ago? Do you support these perverts because the claims were not immediately reported?

First, why didn't they report this to the police immediately?

Second, having been raised Catholic I never witnessed any Priests or Brothers molesting anyone.

Third, if any Priest or Brother had tried to molest me I would have kicked him in the balls and ran to the police station to report it. Why didn't they?

It takes two to tango.
I would assume shame or fear.

That was a pretty dumb statement. Why would you witness such an event?

Probably because they arent you. Some people like you and I would aggressively defend themselves. Others dont. The perverts sense this almost instinctively.

It may take two to tango but it only takes one person to take advantage of someone else.

In life people have to stand up for themselves.

If they do not, then they ONLY HAVE THEMSELVES TO BLAME!
I agree people have to stand up for themselves. However, I dont agree with criminals getting away with their crimes because said person didnt stand up for themselves.
-------------------------------------- they should stand up IMMEDIATEDLY , otherwise its probably BS 36 years later . Course , it'll probably work but that just shows how far the USA has fallen Ace .
Why is it BS simply because they didnt stand up for themselves 40 years ago? Time passing doesnt mean the incident didnt occur.
 
Nah...

Not buying into the polygraph at all. Those can be soft-shoe'd.

When was the polygraph administered? Who gave the polygraph? What questions were asked? Who interpreted the results?
Nobody will ever know, probably never happened.

Nothing says 'probably never happened' like passing a polygraph test.
Excuse me, never happened.

Her polygraph test and eye witness account say otherwise. With Marc Judge (the other person in the room by Ford's account) having already admitted that he not only attended the kind of parties that Ford describes, but got black out drunk, had huge holes in his memory and would routinely try to hook up with drunk girls.

WIth Judge refusing to say it didn't happen. Merely carefully repeating the same phrase over and over in every rendition: that he has 'no recollection'.

She should be heard. Publicly. Under oath. Before Congress.

I'm completely happy (100%) with her being heard...under oath...before congress!

However, I do not believe her.

Then we're in agreement on the next step: public testimony before Congress, under oath.

Its good to find common ground even when we can't agree on every detail.
 
They have had the accusations since july. So if the democrats could've stopped his nomination. Before now, we would know nothing about this. I call bullshit.

Ford asked to remain confidential. Feinstein honored her request, didn't release her name publicly and instead turned over the letter to the FBI.

And passing a polygraph does add weight to her claims.

Nah...

Not buying into the polygraph at all. Those can be soft-shoe'd.

When was the polygraph administered? Who gave the polygraph? What questions were asked? Who interpreted the results?
Nobody will ever know, probably never happened.

You are right, no one can be sure, his buddy was a drunk , even wrote a book about the drunk school days. Birds of feather flock together.
Wow, a couple of teenagers in the 80's drinking alcohol. They must of been badasses, lol. My God who didn't drink back then?

Not everyone who drinks tries to rape a woman.
 
They can't defend themselves, this came up because they want to be able to sue till 50 years of age, today this is nonsense, they should come forward right away or forever deal with it. Same with women today.
I dont think there should be a statue of limitations on crimes that involve deep emotional stress or PTSD. Not allowing the victims to come to grips with their experience before reporting it is wrong.

I have to disagree.
Thats your right.

So if someone raped you and you mentally could not tolerate speaking to someone about it then you would have no problem that your rapist was running for mayor years later?


Why do you keep saying "Rape"?

Kavanaugh is not being accused of rape. He's being accused of molestation. There is a HUGE difference.

Rape is a heiniuos crime that should be punishable by death (IMO).

Most of the accusations being leveled nowadays are more attributable to men being romantic clutz's.

If what she says is true , he tried to rape her.

And lied to try and cover it up.

I've heard arguments that Kavanaugh shouldn't be held responsible for what he did as a teenager as he's a different person now than he was then.

While I reject the argument, it also fails its internal logic if she's accurate: as it demonstrates that Kavanaugh is more than willing to lie today to cover up an attempted forcible rape.

Which is a characteristic I do NOT want in a Supreme Court Justice.
 

Forum List

Back
Top