Witness For The Prosecution!

[westwall]

In an earlier critique of environmentalism, I wrote this:

1. "What the take-away? Environmentalists view mankind as a virus, a disease that must be eradicated. In 2011, [Paul] Ehrlich’s wife wrote a piece in the LATimes, comparing humanity to cancer: “Perpetual growth is the creed of a cancer cell, not a sustainable human society.” Overpopulation: Perpetual growth is the creed of a cancer cell, not a sustainable human society - Los Angeles Times
a. Gee….I’ll bet these folks would be in favor of a President who favored infanticide. And that’s just what we have."


And, viola...what rabbit pops out of the cosmic rabbit hole to verify the above?

2. "Sir David Frederick Attenborough is a British broadcaster and naturalist.
His career as the face and voice of natural history programmes has endured for 60 years. He is best known for writing and presenting the nine Life series, in conjunction with the BBC Natural History Unit, which collectively form a comprehensive survey of all life on the planet."
David Attenborough - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


And...he spills the beans....today:

3. "BBC Legend David Attenborough Labels People a 'Plague'

4. National TV treasure David Attenborough has turned prophet of doom by calling humanity "a plague." He warned in the latest issue of The Radio Times that mother nature shall unleash catasphrophic disasters unless the human race changed its behaviour to slow down population growth.

5. "We are a plague on the earth," warned the presenter of BBC documentary series such as Africa.

"It's coming home to roost in the next 50 years or so. It's not just climate change, its sheer space, places to grow food for this enormous horde."


6. "Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us and the natural world is doing it for us right now," said Attenborough."
BBC Legend David Attenborough Labels People a 'Plague' - IBTimes UK

A warning: Mother Earth Gaia will get you!




Need context for this lunacy?
Let me reprise the following:

While the intellectual father of environmentalism is the philosopher Hegel, who posited two aspects that make ecology possible: a) the idea of the oneness of everything, and b) the superiority of the collective as compared to the individual (a very German concept!). But the emotional daddy is none other than Thomas Malthus. And Liberals are nothing, if not emotional.

a. Malthus originated the view that the food production of the world would increase arithmetically (1-2-3-…), while the human population would increase geometrically (1-2-4-8…). Conclusion: mass starvation and epidemics. Sounds ‘environmental’ already, doesn’t it?

b. Malthus passed on in1834- yet his view continues in the hearts and minds of Progressives, today, who have expanded the vision to pollution and environmental damage.

c. BTW…Malthus has been proven wrong over and over, based on agricultural advances, and technological innovation.


Progressive environmentalists.
They favor the deaths of human being.

well you think people are NO GOOD

No, that would be you and your fellow whackaloons.

 

[mamooth]

Political Chic is considered to possess Unibomber levels of sanity, due to her constant manifesto-style outpourings.

Westwall is just a wannabee. Unfortunately, he doesn't have her talent for being crazy enough to be amusing.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Political Chic is considered to possess Unibomber levels of sanity, due to her constant manifesto-style outpourings.

Westwall is just a wannabee. Unfortunately, he doesn't have her talent for being crazy enough to be amusing.

The thread has put you in your place, that place being with all the other Janissaries of the Left.

All of similar behavior, once steeped in the propaganda of the environmentalists, behave like iron filings in a magnetic field rather than thinking human beings.
Facts, logic, experience,....none matter to any of you.
The typical 'reliable Democrat voters.'


And, being as weak as you are, the ease with which Liberalism could mesmerize, and constrict any nascent insight, was within the blink of an eye.

I hope you don't disappear...because treating you the way you deserve to be treated has become one of my guilty pleasures.

 

[newpolitics]

You talk of logic? That's funny.

 

[Dugdale_Jukes]

In an earlier critique of environmentalism, I wrote this:

1. "What the take-away? Environmentalists view mankind as a virus, a disease that must be eradicated. In 2011, [Paul] Ehrlich’s wife wrote a piece in the LATimes, comparing humanity to cancer: “Perpetual growth is the creed of a cancer cell, not a sustainable human society.” Overpopulation: Perpetual growth is the creed of a cancer cell, not a sustainable human society - Los Angeles Times
a. Gee….I’ll bet these folks would be in favor of a President who favored infanticide. And that’s just what we have."


And, viola...what rabbit pops out of the cosmic rabbit hole to verify the above?

2. "Sir David Frederick Attenborough is a British broadcaster and naturalist.
His career as the face and voice of natural history programmes has endured for 60 years. He is best known for writing and presenting the nine Life series, in conjunction with the BBC Natural History Unit, which collectively form a comprehensive survey of all life on the planet."
David Attenborough - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


And...he spills the beans....today:

3. "BBC Legend David Attenborough Labels People a 'Plague'

4. National TV treasure David Attenborough has turned prophet of doom by calling humanity "a plague." He warned in the latest issue of The Radio Times that mother nature shall unleash catasphrophic disasters unless the human race changed its behaviour to slow down population growth.

5. "We are a plague on the earth," warned the presenter of BBC documentary series such as Africa.

"It's coming home to roost in the next 50 years or so. It's not just climate change, its sheer space, places to grow food for this enormous horde."


6. "Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us and the natural world is doing it for us right now," said Attenborough."
BBC Legend David Attenborough Labels People a 'Plague' - IBTimes UK

A warning: Mother Earth Gaia will get you!




Need context for this lunacy?
Let me reprise the following:

While the intellectual father of environmentalism is the philosopher Hegel, who posited two aspects that make ecology possible: a) the idea of the oneness of everything, and b) the superiority of the collective as compared to the individual (a very German concept!). But the emotional daddy is none other than Thomas Malthus. And Liberals are nothing, if not emotional.

a. Malthus originated the view that the food production of the world would increase arithmetically (1-2-3-&#8230, while the human population would increase geometrically (1-2-4-8&#8230. Conclusion: mass starvation and epidemics. Sounds ‘environmental’ already, doesn’t it?

b. Malthus passed on in1834- yet his view continues in the hearts and minds of Progressives, today, who have expanded the vision to pollution and environmental damage.

c. BTW…Malthus has been proven wrong over and over, based on agricultural advances, and technological innovation.


Progressive environmentalists.
They favor the deaths of human being.

--------------------------------------------------------

That Malthus was wrong has no connection to human blight.

Food coming out of the US midwest is depleting the Ogalala Aquifer at about three times its replenishment rate. Ocean currents are changing weather patterns. The human population is doubling at an unsustainable rate - even if weather patterns remained stable.

Facts aren't alarmist. Facts aren't a political footballs. Facts are evidence. Period.

Trying to hook natural facts to a political persuasion is fool's work. No one posting here is more of a Jeffersonian (read, REAL) Libertarian than me, for example, but I wouldn't piss on Ron or Rand Paul if they were on fire. Fake Libertarian religious nuts advocating that government limit reproductive choices and starve the poor while claiming to be Libertarians disgraces the REAL Libertarian brand, something Ayn Rand knew less about than she knew about blowing Allan Greenspan.

Similarly, neither major party has distinguished itself recently in any ACTION or actual PERFORMANCE area but both parties spout plentitudes of baloney intended to amaze or alarm emotional dimbulbs on some side of all issues, while leadership of both parties continues to help corporations pick taxpayers' pockets.

The bottom line is there are already too many people. God cannot possibly be stupid enough to believe that is a good thing. His followers, however, can be.

 

[PoliticalChic]

In an earlier critique of environmentalism, I wrote this:

1. "What the take-away? Environmentalists view mankind as a virus, a disease that must be eradicated. In 2011, [Paul] Ehrlich’s wife wrote a piece in the LATimes, comparing humanity to cancer: “Perpetual growth is the creed of a cancer cell, not a sustainable human society.” Overpopulation: Perpetual growth is the creed of a cancer cell, not a sustainable human society - Los Angeles Times
a. Gee….I’ll bet these folks would be in favor of a President who favored infanticide. And that’s just what we have."


And, viola...what rabbit pops out of the cosmic rabbit hole to verify the above?

2. "Sir David Frederick Attenborough is a British broadcaster and naturalist.
His career as the face and voice of natural history programmes has endured for 60 years. He is best known for writing and presenting the nine Life series, in conjunction with the BBC Natural History Unit, which collectively form a comprehensive survey of all life on the planet."
David Attenborough - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


And...he spills the beans....today:

3. "BBC Legend David Attenborough Labels People a 'Plague'

4. National TV treasure David Attenborough has turned prophet of doom by calling humanity "a plague." He warned in the latest issue of The Radio Times that mother nature shall unleash catasphrophic disasters unless the human race changed its behaviour to slow down population growth.

5. "We are a plague on the earth," warned the presenter of BBC documentary series such as Africa.

"It's coming home to roost in the next 50 years or so. It's not just climate change, its sheer space, places to grow food for this enormous horde."


6. "Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us and the natural world is doing it for us right now," said Attenborough."
BBC Legend David Attenborough Labels People a 'Plague' - IBTimes UK

A warning: Mother Earth Gaia will get you!




Need context for this lunacy?
Let me reprise the following:

While the intellectual father of environmentalism is the philosopher Hegel, who posited two aspects that make ecology possible: a) the idea of the oneness of everything, and b) the superiority of the collective as compared to the individual (a very German concept!). But the emotional daddy is none other than Thomas Malthus. And Liberals are nothing, if not emotional.

a. Malthus originated the view that the food production of the world would increase arithmetically (1-2-3-…), while the human population would increase geometrically (1-2-4-8…). Conclusion: mass starvation and epidemics. Sounds ‘environmental’ already, doesn’t it?

b. Malthus passed on in1834- yet his view continues in the hearts and minds of Progressives, today, who have expanded the vision to pollution and environmental damage.

c. BTW…Malthus has been proven wrong over and over, based on agricultural advances, and technological innovation.


Progressive environmentalists.
They favor the deaths of human being.

--------------------------------------------------------

That Malthus was wrong has no connection to human blight.

Food coming out of the US midwest is depleting the Ogalala Aquifer at about three times its replenishment rate. Ocean currents are changing weather patterns. The human population is doubling at an unsustainable rate - even if weather patterns remained stable.

Facts aren't alarmist. Facts aren't a political footballs. Facts are evidence. Period.

Trying to hook facts to a political persuasion is fool's work. No one posting here is more of a Jeffersonian (read, REAL) Libertarian than me, for example, but I wouldn't piss on Ron or Rand Paul if they were on fire. Fake Libertarian religious nuts advocating that government limit reproductive choices and starve the poor while claiming to be Libertarians disgraces the REAL Libertarian brand, something Ayn Rand knew less about than she knew about blowing Allan Greenspan.

Similarly, neither major party has distinguished itself recently in any ACTION or actual PERFORMANCE area but both parties spout plentitudes of baloney intended to amaze or alarm emotional dimbulbs on some side of all issues, while leadership of both parties continues to help corporations pick taxpayers' pockets.

The bottom line is there are already too many people. God cannot possibly be stupid enough to believe that is a good thing. His followers, however, can be.

"That Malthus was wrong has no connection to human blight."



Excellent! Graded as an example of The Liberal Playbook, Rule #7e, subclause 3!

7. Never, never criticize in any way any government or movement that is totalitarian, homicidal or anti-American.

a. Claim to idolize despots and tyrants. And always state how their people love them.

b. The corollary applies: never support traditional American values. Important terms: imperialist, oppressor, occupied.

c. Deny atrocities by tyrants. If not possible, explain they were necessary. Finally, justify them, and, show how America was ultimately at fault.

d. Support government officials and appointees.
1.This does not apply to uniformed government employees such as police or military.

e. When endorsing a plan that has clearly failed in the past, it is entirely appropriate to maintain a cognitive disconnection from the failures, by claiming:
1. it wasn’t tried long enough
2. enough money wasn’t provided
3. or, the ever-popular: “It’s different this time.”


Good work, comrade....er, I mean pal. A+

 

[Dugdale_Jukes]

In an earlier critique of environmentalism, I wrote this:

Blah blah blah (paraphrase of PoliticalChic's 6721638, not quote)
--------------------------------------------------------

That Malthus was wrong has no connection to human blight.

Food coming out of the US midwest is depleting the Ogalala Aquifer at about three times its replenishment rate. Ocean currents are changing weather patterns. The human population is doubling at an unsustainable rate - even if weather patterns remained stable.

Facts aren't alarmist. Facts aren't a political footballs. Facts are evidence. Period.

Trying to hook facts to a political persuasion is fool's work. No one posting here is more of a Jeffersonian (read, REAL) Libertarian than me, for example, but I wouldn't piss on Ron or Rand Paul if they were on fire. Fake Libertarian religious nuts advocating that government limit reproductive choices and starve the poor while claiming to be Libertarians disgraces the REAL Libertarian brand, something Ayn Rand knew less about than she knew about blowing Allan Greenspan.

Similarly, neither major party has distinguished itself recently in any ACTION or actual PERFORMANCE area but both parties spout plentitudes of baloney intended to amaze or alarm emotional dimbulbs on some side of all issues, while leadership of both parties continues to help corporations pick taxpayers' pockets.

The bottom line is there are already too many people. God cannot possibly be stupid enough to believe that is a good thing. His followers, however, can be.

"That Malthus was wrong has no connection to human blight."



Excellent! Graded as an example of The Liberal Playbook, Rule #7e, subclause 3!

7. Never, never criticize in any way any government or movement that is totalitarian, homicidal or anti-American.

a. Claim to idolize despots and tyrants. And always state how their people love them.

b. The corollary applies: never support traditional American values. Important terms: imperialist, oppressor, occupied.

c. Deny atrocities by tyrants. If not possible, explain they were necessary. Finally, justify them, and, show how America was ultimately at fault.

d. Support government officials and appointees.
1.This does not apply to uniformed government employees such as police or military.

e. When endorsing a plan that has clearly failed in the past, it is entirely appropriate to maintain a cognitive disconnection from the failures, by claiming:
1. it wasn’t tried long enough
2. enough money wasn’t provided
3. or, the ever-popular: “It’s different this time.”


Good work, comrade....er, I mean pal. A+

--------------------------------------------------------------
Stick the "liberal playbook" stuff where the sun don't shine, Pinko.

My politics are Jeffersonian, a lot closer to REAL Libertarian fiscal conservative/social liberal than any of the weirdo Randian horseplop today's FantasyLand Players in neocon conservative and fake libertarian movements have the intellect to understand or the emotional development to accept.

Natural facts are evidence. Hooking them to politics works with morons.

Keep moving until you find one.

 

[westwall]

In an earlier critique of environmentalism, I wrote this:

1. "What the take-away? Environmentalists view mankind as a virus, a disease that must be eradicated. In 2011, [Paul] Ehrlich’s wife wrote a piece in the LATimes, comparing humanity to cancer: “Perpetual growth is the creed of a cancer cell, not a sustainable human society.” Overpopulation: Perpetual growth is the creed of a cancer cell, not a sustainable human society - Los Angeles Times
a. Gee….I’ll bet these folks would be in favor of a President who favored infanticide. And that’s just what we have."


And, viola...what rabbit pops out of the cosmic rabbit hole to verify the above?

2. "Sir David Frederick Attenborough is a British broadcaster and naturalist.
His career as the face and voice of natural history programmes has endured for 60 years. He is best known for writing and presenting the nine Life series, in conjunction with the BBC Natural History Unit, which collectively form a comprehensive survey of all life on the planet."
David Attenborough - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


And...he spills the beans....today:

3. "BBC Legend David Attenborough Labels People a 'Plague'

4. National TV treasure David Attenborough has turned prophet of doom by calling humanity "a plague." He warned in the latest issue of The Radio Times that mother nature shall unleash catasphrophic disasters unless the human race changed its behaviour to slow down population growth.

5. "We are a plague on the earth," warned the presenter of BBC documentary series such as Africa.

"It's coming home to roost in the next 50 years or so. It's not just climate change, its sheer space, places to grow food for this enormous horde."


6. "Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us and the natural world is doing it for us right now," said Attenborough."
BBC Legend David Attenborough Labels People a 'Plague' - IBTimes UK

A warning: Mother Earth Gaia will get you!




Need context for this lunacy?
Let me reprise the following:

While the intellectual father of environmentalism is the philosopher Hegel, who posited two aspects that make ecology possible: a) the idea of the oneness of everything, and b) the superiority of the collective as compared to the individual (a very German concept!). But the emotional daddy is none other than Thomas Malthus. And Liberals are nothing, if not emotional.

a. Malthus originated the view that the food production of the world would increase arithmetically (1-2-3-&#8230, while the human population would increase geometrically (1-2-4-8&#8230. Conclusion: mass starvation and epidemics. Sounds ‘environmental’ already, doesn’t it?

b. Malthus passed on in1834- yet his view continues in the hearts and minds of Progressives, today, who have expanded the vision to pollution and environmental damage.

c. BTW…Malthus has been proven wrong over and over, based on agricultural advances, and technological innovation.


Progressive environmentalists.
They favor the deaths of human being.

--------------------------------------------------------

That Malthus was wrong has no connection to human blight.

Food coming out of the US midwest is depleting the Ogalala Aquifer at about three times its replenishment rate. Ocean currents are changing weather patterns. The human population is doubling at an unsustainable rate - even if weather patterns remained stable.

Facts aren't alarmist. Facts aren't a political footballs. Facts are evidence. Period.

Trying to hook natural facts to a political persuasion is fool's work. No one posting here is more of a Jeffersonian (read, REAL) Libertarian than me, for example, but I wouldn't piss on Ron or Rand Paul if they were on fire. Fake Libertarian religious nuts advocating that government limit reproductive choices and starve the poor while claiming to be Libertarians disgraces the REAL Libertarian brand, something Ayn Rand knew less about than she knew about blowing Allan Greenspan.

Similarly, neither major party has distinguished itself recently in any ACTION or actual PERFORMANCE area but both parties spout plentitudes of baloney intended to amaze or alarm emotional dimbulbs on some side of all issues, while leadership of both parties continues to help corporations pick taxpayers' pockets.

The bottom line is there are already too many people. God cannot possibly be stupid enough to believe that is a good thing. His followers, however, can be.

Ahhhhhyes, facts. And people, like you, who continuously use false ones. The human population is leveling off and will peak at around 9 billion give or take a few hundred million. The carrying capacity of the planet (when not interfered with by despots and environazis, is there a difference?) is close to 40 billion.

You were saying?

 

[PoliticalChic]

"That Malthus was wrong has no connection to human blight."



Excellent! Graded as an example of The Liberal Playbook, Rule #7e, subclause 3!

7. Never, never criticize in any way any government or movement that is totalitarian, homicidal or anti-American.

a. Claim to idolize despots and tyrants. And always state how their people love them.

b. The corollary applies: never support traditional American values. Important terms: imperialist, oppressor, occupied.

c. Deny atrocities by tyrants. If not possible, explain they were necessary. Finally, justify them, and, show how America was ultimately at fault.

d. Support government officials and appointees.
1.This does not apply to uniformed government employees such as police or military.

e. When endorsing a plan that has clearly failed in the past, it is entirely appropriate to maintain a cognitive disconnection from the failures, by claiming:
1. it wasn’t tried long enough
2. enough money wasn’t provided
3. or, the ever-popular: “It’s different this time.”


Good work, comrade....er, I mean pal. A+

--------------------------------------------------------------
Stick the "liberal playbook" stuff where the sun don't shine, Pinko.

My politics are Jeffersonian, a lot closer to REAL Libertarian fiscal conservative/social liberal than any of the weirdo Randian horseplop today's FantasyLand Players in neocon conservative and fake libertarian movements have the intellect to understand or the emotional development to accept.

Natural facts are evidence. Hooking them to politics works with morons.

Keep moving until you find one.

Time for a remedial:

"You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.
Rahm Emanuel


Only the dull of wit fail to understand how this is related to political endeavors.

Raise your paw.

 

[Dugdale_Jukes]

Is this person Emmanuel your new Malthus? Or just the newest demon for those who need a demon to function in daily life? My habit is to stick to the facts and ignore personalities, so Obama is barely on my radar, let alone popular fantasy futurescum.

Here is a fact:

http://http://www.citeste-ne.ro/wp-content/uploads/World-Population-Growth-Chart.gif

 

[mamooth]

The thread has put you in your place, that place being with all the other Janissaries of the Left.

The Janissaries were fearsome warriors. So I'll ignore the anti-muslim racism part of it (being we expect that from you), and just correctly take it as your admission that I've been kicking your ass hard.

Why won't you just discuss the science using reason and evidence, like a rational person?

Oh that's right, you can't. You suck at logic, science, ethics, history, everything. Hence, all you've got left are the cut-and-paste unibomber manifestos.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Is this person Emmanuel your new Malthus? Or just the newest demon for those who need a demon to function in daily life? My habit is to stick to the facts and ignore personalities, so Obama is barely on my radar, let alone popular fantasy futurescum.

Here is a fact:

http://http://www.citeste-ne.ro/wp-content/uploads/World-Population-Growth-Chart.gif

"Not Found"

 

[PoliticalChic]

The thread has put you in your place, that place being with all the other Janissaries of the Left.

The Janissaries were fearsome warriors. So I'll ignore the anti-muslim racism part of it (being we expect that from you), and just correctly take it as your admission that I've been kicking your ass hard.

Why won't you just discuss the science using reason and evidence, like a rational person?

Oh that's right, you can't. You suck at logic, science, ethics, history, everything. Hence, all you've got left are the cut-and-paste unibomber manifestos.

Janissary: a member of a group of loyal or subservient troops, officials, or supporters

Loyal order-takers, like you.


Certainly not able to think for oneself.....like you, also.


'".... and just correctly take it as your admission that I've been kicking your ass hard."
Well, you've certainly perfected self-delusion as a defense mechanism.

I've already provided data and testimony, to no avail.
As they say in the South, There’s no education in the second kick of a mule.


Based on the insouciant attitude toward the lives you are willing to sacrifice to your Leftist ideology, you deserve no better than to you walk behind the elephant in the procession of life.

 

[Oddball]

In an earlier critique of environmentalism, I wrote this:

1. "What the take-away? Environmentalists view mankind as a virus, a disease that must be eradicated. In 2011, [Paul] Ehrlich’s wife wrote a piece in the LATimes, comparing humanity to cancer: “Perpetual growth is the creed of a cancer cell, not a sustainable human society.” Overpopulation: Perpetual growth is the creed of a cancer cell, not a sustainable human society - Los Angeles Times
a. Gee….I’ll bet these folks would be in favor of a President who favored infanticide. And that’s just what we have."


And, viola...what rabbit pops out of the cosmic rabbit hole to verify the above?

2. "Sir David Frederick Attenborough is a British broadcaster and naturalist.
His career as the face and voice of natural history programmes has endured for 60 years. He is best known for writing and presenting the nine Life series, in conjunction with the BBC Natural History Unit, which collectively form a comprehensive survey of all life on the planet."
David Attenborough - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


And...he spills the beans....today:

3. "BBC Legend David Attenborough Labels People a 'Plague'

4. National TV treasure David Attenborough has turned prophet of doom by calling humanity "a plague." He warned in the latest issue of The Radio Times that mother nature shall unleash catasphrophic disasters unless the human race changed its behaviour to slow down population growth.

5. "We are a plague on the earth," warned the presenter of BBC documentary series such as Africa.

"It's coming home to roost in the next 50 years or so. It's not just climate change, its sheer space, places to grow food for this enormous horde."


6. "Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us and the natural world is doing it for us right now," said Attenborough."
BBC Legend David Attenborough Labels People a 'Plague' - IBTimes UK

A warning: Mother Earth Gaia will get you!




Need context for this lunacy?
Let me reprise the following:

While the intellectual father of environmentalism is the philosopher Hegel, who posited two aspects that make ecology possible: a) the idea of the oneness of everything, and b) the superiority of the collective as compared to the individual (a very German concept!). But the emotional daddy is none other than Thomas Malthus. And Liberals are nothing, if not emotional.

a. Malthus originated the view that the food production of the world would increase arithmetically (1-2-3-…), while the human population would increase geometrically (1-2-4-8…). Conclusion: mass starvation and epidemics. Sounds ‘environmental’ already, doesn’t it?

b. Malthus passed on in1834- yet his view continues in the hearts and minds of Progressives, today, who have expanded the vision to pollution and environmental damage.

c. BTW…Malthus has been proven wrong over and over, based on agricultural advances, and technological innovation.


Progressive environmentalists.
They favor the deaths of human being.

--------------------------------------------------------

That Malthus was wrong has no connection to human blight.

Food coming out of the US midwest is depleting the Ogalala Aquifer at about three times its replenishment rate. Ocean currents are changing weather patterns. The human population is doubling at an unsustainable rate - even if weather patterns remained stable.

Facts aren't alarmist. Facts aren't a political footballs. Facts are evidence. Period.

Trying to hook natural facts to a political persuasion is fool's work. No one posting here is more of a Jeffersonian (read, REAL) Libertarian than me, for example, but I wouldn't piss on Ron or Rand Paul if they were on fire. Fake Libertarian religious nuts advocating that government limit reproductive choices and starve the poor while claiming to be Libertarians disgraces the REAL Libertarian brand, something Ayn Rand knew less about than she knew about blowing Allan Greenspan.

Similarly, neither major party has distinguished itself recently in any ACTION or actual PERFORMANCE area but both parties spout plentitudes of baloney intended to amaze or alarm emotional dimbulbs on some side of all issues, while leadership of both parties continues to help corporations pick taxpayers' pockets.

The bottom line is there are already too many people. God cannot possibly be stupid enough to believe that is a good thing. His followers, however, can be.

Ahhhhhyes, facts. And people, like you, who continuously use false ones. The human population is leveling off and will peak at around 9 billion give or take a few hundred million. The carrying capacity of the planet (when not interfered with by despots and environazis, is there a difference?) is close to 40 billion.

You were saying?

That we currently know about.

One of the biggest handicaps of the Malthusian declinist types is the blind eye they turn to the fact that not only does technology not stand still, it also results in a steadily flattening population growth rate and production of more for the populace with fewer resources used.

America and the most technologically advanced nations in Europe have been at zero (and even negative) population growth for decades, and continue to produce more food on less and less farm land.

 

[Dugdale_Jukes]

It is entirely possible some of the more astute observers here might perceive the possibility of an unsustainable aberration.

In re America's aquifers, the unsustainable patterns run in the opposite direction - down the Y axis.

Again: Facts are not political. They don't respect religion. They just are.

 

[SSDD]

Political Chic is considered to possess Unibomber levels of sanity, due to her constant manifesto-style outpourings.

Westwall is just a wannabee. Unfortunately, he doesn't have her talent for being crazy enough to be amusing.

Says possibly the least intelligent person on the board.

 

[Oddball]

It is entirely possible some of the more astute observers here might perceive the possibility of an unsustainable aberration.

In re America's aquifers, the unsustainable patterns run in the opposite direction - down the Y axis.

Again: Facts are not political. They don't respect religion. They just are.

And the fact remains that the more technically advanced the population, the more they trend toward zero and negative population growth.

Even though I don't have any chart with pretty colors to show this fact, it stands as such

 

[Dugdale_Jukes]

And the fact remains that the more technically advanced the population, the more they trend toward zero and negative population growth. - Oddball

Judging by the fat assed families one sees in compensator gear from shoes to vehicles to homes, technical advances don't seem to diminish consumption. We're in new territory there, sport.

Even though I don't have any chart with pretty colors to show this fact, it stands as such. - Oddball

Charts with pretty colors are important. Do not share your point of view with any of my reports. Okay?

 

[Oddball]

Didn't say it diminished consumption, Captain Strawman.

Please try reading for comprehension...It'll really punch up your communication skills.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Political Chic is considered to possess Unibomber levels of sanity, due to her constant manifesto-style outpourings.

Westwall is just a wannabee. Unfortunately, he doesn't have her talent for being crazy enough to be amusing.

Says possibly the least intelligent person on the board.

You are referring to the exemplar of stupidity?