Will someone other then me acknowledge 9/11 occurred???

Discussion in 'Politics' started by healthmyths, Jun 2, 2012.

  1. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,230
    Thanks Received:
    2,044
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,850
    Will they also acknowledge that the dot.com bust occurred or the WORST hurricane SEASONS in history occurred.. all from 2001 to 2008!
    If you are one of the other historically aware persons like me YOU will say "Yes"!
    1) Dot.com bust occurred ending the "Clinton" Bubble of phony dot.com stocks and as a result created a $5 trillion losses that each year from 2002 on taxes allowed $166 billion in LOWER tax payment THUS lower revenue!

    2) And if you agree with that you MUST agree that the $2 trillion in losses from 9/11 are written off at the rate of $66 billion a year in NO Federal tax revenue. Remember airlines didn't fly for 3 days! Wall st was closed for 10 days! Then the anthrax attacks occurred. Folks that are realists MUST admit these events occurred in 2001 to 2002 as well as An estimated 600,000 jobs were lost as a direct consequence of the terrorist attacks.

    3) NOW I know at least one of you agree the Worst hurricanes happened and cost over $1 trillion in market,lost businesses, Hurricane Rita quickly followed Katrina only to make matters worse. Between the two, more than $200 billion in damage was done.
    400,000 jobs were lost and 275,000 homes were destroyed. .
    This $1 trillion is being written off at the rate of $33 billion a year in LOST Federal tax revenue!

    I'm going to shout: OVER $266 billion a year in LOST FEDERAL TAX revenue! Each year starting in 2002 and carrying over for next 20 years!

    Where has there been ANY stories as to this $266 billion a year in lost Federal revenue?
    Where has there been any stories other then the below that RECOGNIZED that IN spite of these events:
    The economy grew every year. Unemployment diminished! Countries were liberated!
    ALL in spite of the MSM/Democrats doing everything and saying everything including the recruiting by Reid/Murtha/Obama/Kerry of terrorists encouraging them to kill US troops!

    The Top 10 Financial Events of the Decade
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Jun 2, 2012
  2. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,230
    Thanks Received:
    2,044
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,850
    Now for all you conservatives out there...
    WHERE in all that LOST tax revenue is there ANY proof for this totally cliched.. dumb ass comment:
    "Bush spent like a drunken sailor"!!!


    Your source:https://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=6129&type=0
    This is the : Measures of the Federal Budget Surplus or Deficit, 2001 to 2006
    2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total surplus/deficit
    Total Budget Surplus or Deficit $128 -158 -378 -412 -368 -295 -161 -438 -2,082
    now if the $266 billion was
    added to the budget:
    how much lost tax revenue: -0- 166 166 232 232 266 266 266 1,594

    So subtracting from the 2,082 in deficits the 1,594 in LOST tax revenue: TOTAL 8 year loss $488 billion!
    So again you conservatives TeLL me again???
    And if in fact we didn't have the Homeland security???
    since it's creation in 2001 average annual budget: $60 or in 6 years of Bush $480 .. wipes out the loss!
    Then because idiots like Democrats Kerry/Reid/Obama/Murtha kept successfully prolonging Iraq.. another $500 billion that was spent ENDING the 1991 CEASE FIRE..
    That $500 billion would NOT be spent!
    Therefore a BUDGE Surplus GREATER THEN any President..
    SO again TeLL me where Bush was a drunken sailor spendthrift???
     
  3. NYcarbineer
    Online

    NYcarbineer Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    96,022
    Thanks Received:
    11,264
    Trophy Points:
    2,060
    Location:
    Finger Lakes, NY
    Ratings:
    +30,229
    All you're doing is emphasizing the insanity of Bush cutting taxes twice in 2001 and 2003.
     
  4. Dont Taz Me Bro
    Online

    Dont Taz Me Bro USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Messages:
    31,616
    Thanks Received:
    6,684
    Trophy Points:
    1,170
    Location:
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    Ratings:
    +17,491
    Happy Acres let you out again?
     
  5. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,230
    Thanks Received:
    2,044
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,850
    YES you f..king idiot!
    Did YOU remember the RECESSION that STARTED UNDER CLINTON and ended in 11/2001?
    That was the reason for the tax cuts!

    Idiot... do you remember 9/11? Do you remember dot.com bust??

    BOTH of which cost trillions and when Bush encouraged "go shopping" he was doing what was best to stimulate growth in spite of the 2000 recession, 9/11 attack!


    But you can't ADMIT those events happened.. i.e. dot com bust/9/11/worst hurricanes!
    Why? They were reality!
    Tax cuts planned BEFORE those events! And accelerated BECAUSE of them!
    idiot!
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,230
    Thanks Received:
    2,044
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,850
    That supposedly "Clinton surplus"??? POOF!!! Gone when the phony dot com companies burning through cash investors DEDUCTED from their taxes those LOSSES!

    But so far all you idiots have done is IGNORE reality and making references to letting me out does NOT alter the FACTS.. $266 billion a year in lost tax revenue due to dot.com/9/11 and worst hurricanes will NOT go away!

    Historians will record that during this period Bush was a great president that IN spite of idiots like most of you bashers who Totally ignore the FACTS and IN spite of the MSM idiots like you bashers doing everything to encourage the terrorists and tear down our country.. the USA grew!

    Give me the facts people that counter the above!!
     
  7. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
    then why did we go to Iraq?
     
  8. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
    The Iraq war was a war built on LIES to the American people about mushroom clouds.

    we were told NO ONE could imagine a plane hitting a building because people hated the US.


    The problem is Richrad Clarke tried to warn them and they had documents TELLING them OBL want to strike the US.

    hell John Oneil left becasue they wouldnt listen to him.

    You assholes glibbly called them DISGRUNTLED employees.


    Bush held back the broker rules in the GLBact so his rich buddies could make bank.


    Yes he will go down as the WORST president.

    and you will be one of the idiots claiming he was great.
     
  9. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,230
    Thanks Received:
    2,044
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,850
    A) Do you remember the 1991 CEASE FIRE?
    Saddam had continued to break it and with 9/11 NO one knew for sure what Saddam's
    involvement (obviously 20/20 hindsighters like YOU knew all along..right???)
    Saddam also was supporting terrorists paying $25,000 to suicide bomber families!
    So of course it was but you weren't around were you ..at that time to consider Saddam
    the number 1 terrorists supporting other terrorists!
    B) Do you remember Clinton signing the:
    There were twelve resolutions from 1991-1998 declaring Iraq in violation of the cease fire, demanding compliance, and threatening "serious consequences."

    December 16, 1998 8:51 p.m. EST (0151 GMT)
    WASHINGTON (CNN) -- From the Oval Office, President Clinton told the nation Wednesday evening why he ordered new military strikes against Iraq.
    "Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors," said Clinton.

    The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 Public law 105-338 [SIGNED BY CLINTON!!!] expressed the sense of congress it should
    be policy to support efforts to remove from power the current Iraqi regime.
    The Act found that Iraq had between 1980 and 1998 (1) committed various and significant violations of International Law, (2) had failed to comply with the obligations to which it had agreed to following the Gulf War and (3) further had ignored Resolutions of the United Nations Security Council. The Act declared that it was the Policy of the United States to support "regime change." The Act was passed 360-38 in the U.S. House of Representatives[2] and by unanimous consent in the Senate.[3] US President Bill Clinton signed the bill into law on October 31, 1998.

    Timeline Iraq War IRAQ events... time line
    In the first three months of 1999, U.S. led-forces bombarded Iraq with 241,000 pounds of bombs just shy of the 253,000 pounds dropped under President Bush in the eight months leading up to the final UN resolution before the war.


    SO DUH... what the f.kk. would an idiot done AT that point in time??

    Based on ALL information.. based on Saddam's continuing ignoring of sanctions..
    the 1991 CEASE FIRE continued with his capture!
     
  10. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,230
    Thanks Received:
    2,044
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,850
    But of course ONLY idiots have the stupidity to criticize people that have to make decisions at the time with information that the MONDAY morning quarterback idiots like critics with the advantage of 20/20 hindsight pretend they ARE the experts!
    People like that show me they have NEVER been in positions where limited information and events demand responses require the capability of making DECISIONS... i.e. that's why Bush was the "decider"!!!!
     

Share This Page