2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,970
- 52,238
- 2,290
The Economist just did a piece on the NRA and the Second Amendment....and got their facts wrong...why....because they trusted a rabidly anti gun group to provide their stats....and that group lied about the stats because they hate guns.....
Hit Me with Your Best Shot The Economist s Epic Fail on Guns - Breitbart
What The Economist didn’t report is that one of the leading groups against the proposed ban was the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP). On March 5, Breitbart News reported that FOP president James Pasco described the ban as unnecessary and pointed out that the round in question—the M855—”has not historically posed a threat to law enforcement.”
After reporting Everytown’s misinformation as fact and suggesting the M855 round endangers police—although the FOP says it doesn’t—The Economist tried to undercut arguments for arming women on college campuses for self-defense.
Hit Me with Your Best Shot The Economist s Epic Fail on Guns - Breitbart
What The Economist didn’t report is that one of the leading groups against the proposed ban was the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP). On March 5, Breitbart News reported that FOP president James Pasco described the ban as unnecessary and pointed out that the round in question—the M855—”has not historically posed a threat to law enforcement.”
After reporting Everytown’s misinformation as fact and suggesting the M855 round endangers police—although the FOP says it doesn’t—The Economist tried to undercut arguments for arming women on college campuses for self-defense.
