Why Would Ukraine Want To Help Someone Who Turned Their Back On Them, Let Russia Have Crimea?

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,094
2,645
As Russia collusion fades, Ukrainian plot to help Clinton emerges

"After nearly three years and millions of tax dollars, the Trump-Russia collusion probe is about to be resolved. Emerging in its place is newly unearthed evidence suggesting another foreign effort to influence the 2016 election — this time, in favor of the Democrats.

Ukraine’s top prosecutor divulged that he has opened an investigation into whether his country’s law enforcement apparatus intentionally leaked financial records during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign about then-Trump campaign chairman
Paul in an effort to sway the election in favor of Hillary Clinton.

Ukraine Prosecutor General Yurii Lutsenko’s probe was prompted by a Ukrainian parliamentarian's release of a tape recording purporting to quote a top law enforcement official as saying his agency leaked the Manafort financial records to help Clinton's campaign.

The parliamentarian also secured a
court ruling that the leak amounted to “an illegal intrusion into the American election campaign”

"the tape recording is a serious enough allegation to warrant opening a probe, and one of his concerns is that the Ukrainian law enforcement agency involved had frequent contact with the Obama administration’s U.S. Embassy in Kiev at the time.

“Today we will launch a criminal investigation about this and we will give legal assessment of this information,” declared Lutsenko.

If Ukraine law enforcement figures who worked frequently with the U.S. Embassy did leak the Manafort documents in an effort to influence the American election for Clinton, the public deserves to know who knew what, and when."



Barak Obama and Sect of State Clinton broke a US pledge to help defend the Ukraine's sovereign borders and did nothing to even slow Putin's military annexation of Crimea.

So WHY would anyone in the Ukraine want to help either of them do anything?

The answer is 'CORRUPTION' and 'MONEY'....


As Russia collusion fades, Ukrainian plot to help Clinton emerges


.
 
As the record shows, President Obama was no stranger to 'CORRUPTION' - his administration was filled with it. What many Americans DO NOT KNOW is that Barak Obama's corrupt administration also had tendrils that spread through the Ukrainian government and affected how they prosecuted criminal cases there as well.

It turns out Obama did not just protect criminals here in his own administration - he protected criminals in the Ukraine, too:

"Ukraine Prosecutor GeneralLutsenko accused the Obama-era U.S. Embassy in 2016 of interfering in his ability to prosecute corruption cases, saying the Obama Administration's U.S. ambassador gave him a list of defendants that he would not be allowed to pursue and then refused to cooperate in an early investigation into the alleged misappropriation of U.S. aid in Ukraine."



As Russia collusion fades, Ukrainian plot to help Clinton emerges




Evidence is starting to surface suggesting the Obama administration - specifically the now-known-to-be-criminal-at-that-time FBI and the Trump-hating foreign who was working for the FBI - was already working inside the Ukraine targeting Trump's Campaign manager, Manafort. In doing so, the Obama administration was protecting people from investigation / indictment by providing the top Ukraine Prosecutor with a list of people he could not investigate.
 
Why was The Podesta Group doing work on behalf of Clinton and Obama in The Ukraine and trying to conceal what they were doing by registering Manafort and Gates under a Domestic Lobbying classification instead of a Foreign Lobbying classification which has far more stringent reporting standards?
 
"We know the FBI set up shop in the U.S. embassy in Kiev to assist its Ukraine–Manafort inquiry — a common practice on foreign-based probes — while using Steele as an informant at the start of its Russia probe. And we know Clinton’s campaign was using a law firm to pay an opposition research firm for Steele’s work in an effort to stop Trump from winning the presidency, at the same time Steele was aiding the FBI.

Those intersections, coupled with the new allegations by Ukraine’s top prosecutor, are reason enough to warrant a serious, thorough investigation."



Drip, drip, drip....like water from a leaky faucet, the truth comes out....it eventually all comes out....
 
"We know the FBI set up shop in the U.S. embassy in Kiev to assist its Ukraine–Manafort inquiry — a common practice on foreign-based probes — while using Steele as an informant at the start of its Russia probe. And we know Clinton’s campaign was using a law firm to pay an opposition research firm for Steele’s work in an effort to stop Trump from winning the presidency, at the same time Steele was aiding the FBI.

Those intersections, coupled with the new allegations by Ukraine’s top prosecutor, are reason enough to warrant a serious, thorough investigation."



Drip, drip, drip....like water from a leaky faucet, the truth comes out....it eventually all comes out....
The Money went from Clinton Obama - Podesta Group - COIE Lawfirm - Fusion GPS -Skirpal Steele - and then on to The Ukraine & Russia.

What anyone with a brain should find interesting is The Podesta Group's involvement in this, and the fact that Manafort and Gates worked for The Podesta Group in The Ukraine on behalf of Clinton and Obama.

Mueller refused to investigate that link and instead gave The Podesta Group immunity while simultaneously investigating their two employees, Gates and Manafort for things they did in The Ukraine years before they even met Donald Trump. Mueller granting immunity to The Podesta Group means Manafort could not defend himself against any charges leveled at him for work he did on behalf of The Podesta Group in The Ukraine.

Now, isn't that just "clever"?

How Convenient
 
"We know the FBI set up shop in the U.S. embassy in Kiev to assist its Ukraine–Manafort inquiry — a common practice on foreign-based probes — while using Steele as an informant at the start of its Russia probe. And we know Clinton’s campaign was using a law firm to pay an opposition research firm for Steele’s work in an effort to stop Trump from winning the presidency, at the same time Steele was aiding the FBI.

Those intersections, coupled with the new allegations by Ukraine’s top prosecutor, are reason enough to warrant a serious, thorough investigation."



Drip, drip, drip....like water from a leaky faucet, the truth comes out....it eventually all comes out....
The Money went from Clinton Obama - Podesta Group - COIE Lawfirm - Fusion GPS -Skirpal Steele - and then on to The Ukraine & Russia.

What anyone with a brain should find interesting is The Podesta Group's involvement in this, and the fact that Manafort and Gates worked for The Podesta Group in The Ukraine on behalf of Clinton and Obama.

Mueller refused to investigate that link and instead gave The Podesta Group immunity while simultaneously investigating their two employees, Gates and Manafort for things they did in The Ukraine years before they even met Donald Trump. Mueller granting immunity to The Podesta Group means Manafort could not defend himself against any charges leveled at him for work he did on behalf of The Podesta Group in The Ukraine.

Now, isn't that just "clever"?

How Convenient



2f0deabded12ad3e8b1dd371681c1f20.jpg
 
As Russia collusion fades, Ukrainian plot to help Clinton emerges

"After nearly three years and millions of tax dollars, the Trump-Russia collusion probe is about to be resolved. Emerging in its place is newly unearthed evidence suggesting another foreign effort to influence the 2016 election — this time, in favor of the Democrats.

Ukraine’s top prosecutor divulged that he has opened an investigation into whether his country’s law enforcement apparatus intentionally leaked financial records during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign about then-Trump campaign chairman
Paul in an effort to sway the election in favor of Hillary Clinton.

Ukraine Prosecutor General Yurii Lutsenko’s probe was prompted by a Ukrainian parliamentarian's release of a tape recording purporting to quote a top law enforcement official as saying his agency leaked the Manafort financial records to help Clinton's campaign.

The parliamentarian also secured a
court ruling that the leak amounted to “an illegal intrusion into the American election campaign”

"the tape recording is a serious enough allegation to warrant opening a probe, and one of his concerns is that the Ukrainian law enforcement agency involved had frequent contact with the Obama administration’s U.S. Embassy in Kiev at the time.

“Today we will launch a criminal investigation about this and we will give legal assessment of this information,” declared Lutsenko.

If Ukraine law enforcement figures who worked frequently with the U.S. Embassy did leak the Manafort documents in an effort to influence the American election for Clinton, the public deserves to know who knew what, and when."



Barak Obama and Sect of State Clinton broke a US pledge to help defend the Ukraine's sovereign borders and did nothing to even slow Putin's military annexation of Crimea.

So WHY would anyone in the Ukraine want to help either of them do anything?

The answer is 'CORRUPTION' and 'MONEY'....


As Russia collusion fades, Ukrainian plot to help Clinton emerges


.
REPORTER (Jeff Mason from Reuters): President Putin, did you want President Trump to win the election and did you direct any of your officials to help him do that?

PUTIN: Yes, I did. Yes, I did. Because he talked about bringing the US/Russia relationship back to normal.

Read the full transcript of the Helsinki press conference


NEXT!
 

Forum List

Back
Top