Hockey stick, schmockey stick. The bottom line is, knowing GHGs trap infra-red radiation, warming is inevitable, if the rising trend of their concentrations, seen since the advent of the Industrial Revolution, continues. Argue all you want about temps and models, I have seen no attempt to show what I said to be false, just misdirection and distractions from the logic impaired. So the hockey stick graph wasn't perfect. Initial stabs at new lines of research rarely are. Over time, with more data most of those problems will clear up. What doesn't seem to ever clear up is the deniers' refusal to face the basic facts concerning the scientifically well-documented properties of GHGs!!!
And our current warming trend still started before the Industrial Revolution.
How can something in the future be the cause of something in the past?
Last edited: