Why the President's first reaction was to lie about Benghazi.

[bigrebnc1775]

Once you admit OBAMA didn't lie, then we can move on to Ambassador Rice.

You're such a fucktard.

Obama did lie, and continues to lie.

You know it, but you hold party above the nation and lie to protect your shameful party.

{ The United States condemns, in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. We’re working with the government of Libya to secure our diplomats. I’ve also directed my administration to increase our security at diplomatic posts around the world.

And make no mistake, we will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers who attacked our people. Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths.

We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None.

Directly he attributes the attack to the denigration of religion and senseless violence. Does he mention terror? Yes. Again, from the transcript.

Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks. We mourn with the families who were lost on that day. I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed. And then last night we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.

As Americans let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases lay down their lives for it. Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those, both civilian and military, who represent us around the globe.

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.

But as theologians say in regards to Biblical exegesis, “text without context is a pretext.” And the left’s used of the sole mention of “acts of terror” in defense of Obama’s statement is just that, a pretext.

Saying this statement applies to Benghazi in any way is incomprehensible in light of what Obama was saying preceding it. Using the left’s logic, Obama could claim that he said Benghazi was a significant as 9/11/2001 (I don’t think we can ever refer to just 9/11 again after this year) because he does mention 9/11. }

Parsing Obama’s Benghazi Lie: He Blamed The Video Not Terror | RedState

Is it your position that the attack could not possibly be BOTH terrorism and religiously inspired??

Those 2 are mutually exclusive??

In your mind you see obama walking on water, be honest that's how you see obama and no amount of facts will change that.

 

[GoneBezerk]

Obamination and his goons have paraded themselves out on stage during the campaign as the "killers of UBL" and those responsible for terrorism going away like the typewriter.

Oh, but now an attack on Americans in Libya threw a monkey wrench in their bullshit claims. They couldn't have this situation ruin their talking points on the campaign trail. I don't doubt they thought they could cover up the deaths of these Americans....hiding it under the carpet if the news didn't catch wind of it.

Once it hit the news that the attack was on-going....their response was how to cover it up. How to cover up their denials for security before and during the attack. So they invented the video angle and ran with it to save their own asses.

Their non-response with military and/or CIA forces to save 4 Americans in harm's way shows what they think about other Americans they send in harm's way. Why should they give a fuck about you too???? They don't....

 

[copsnrobbers]

Obama and Hillary lied to Tyrone Woods father while his body was brought to them.

Then Hillary went to Brazil for cover and lied again in her phoney la la la media speech.

Obama cut and run then sent his minions out to lie for him, and HE then lied over and over again himself.

How could any American who knows this vote for him? Any person who would is be beyond shit.

I will never understand how anyone could back this traitor. He's more interested in saving his sorry ass so he can get reelected than to tell the families of these slain Americans the truth. The lies he told about the film, the lies Hillary told about the film, they lies they used to cover up this terrorist attack are horrendous. Yet they still find a way to justify a vote for him. God help us if too many people actually think this way.

His Jihad is at stake.

 

[Liability]

When Carbuncle claims that someone has defeated his own argument WITH his own argument, what Carbuncle would actually be saying if he could be honest is, "oh. I see now."

 

[Uncensored2008]

Is it your position that the attack could not possibly be BOTH terrorism and religiously inspired??

Those 2 are mutually exclusive??

Islamic terrorism IS religiously inspired. That does not make the Obama cover story that an obscure video, released three months prior, which had garnered a total of 17 views, was the basis of the attack.

U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice appeared on five different Sunday news shows September 16th and told the nation that “the best information and the best assessment we have today is that in fact this was not a preplanned, premeditated attack…that it was a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired in Cairo as a consequence of the video”

This administration has blatantly lied to the American people, over and over.

 

[Uncensored2008]

You refuted your own argument within your argument.

You said that the reference to 'acts of terror' could not possibly be a reference to Benghazi,

but earlier you insisted that the reference 'all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others'

had to be considered a direct and specific reference to Benghazi.

Which is it? Is a plural, generalized reference able to be a direct reference, in context, or not???

In the case you want it to be you say 'yes'. In the case you don't want it to be, you say 'no'.

Clean up your argument please.

Don't be an idiot, it's unbecoming.

{But as theologians say in regards to Biblical exegesis, “text without context is a pretext.” And the left’s used of the sole mention of “acts of terror” in defense of Obama’s statement is just that, a pretext.}

 

[GoneBezerk]

The scum believing and defending Obamination's lies are idiots with no clue about "the inside."

They just believe his lies that he wasn't given the information needed to respond to the situation. He is covering his ass with these lies knowing all the time there are morons out there that will believe anything.

As someone that knows about how, when and what he knew......he is lying, as usual.

If he claims he wasn't told in time, then where the hell was he at??? Lost in the toilet, having sex, playing golf, etc?

If he claims he wasn't given the right information, then he needs to explain the CIA reports of armed attck on the consulate. He can tell Panetta to lie to the American public for the DoD angle, but they both can't hide this info leaking out of the NMCC, AFRICOM, etc in the next week or months.

Romney needs to hold a trial against Obamination, Clinton, etc once he is in office....charge them with manslaughter, treason, etc.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Is it your position that the attack could not possibly be BOTH terrorism and religiously inspired??

Those 2 are mutually exclusive??

Islamic terrorism IS religiously inspired. That does not make the Obama cover story that an obscure video, released three months prior, which had garnered a total of 17 views, was the basis of the attack.

U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice appeared on five different Sunday news shows September 16th and told the nation that “the best information and the best assessment we have today is that in fact this was not a preplanned, premeditated attack…that it was a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired in Cairo as a consequence of the video”

This administration has blatantly lied to the American people, over and over.

US Ambassador Susan Rice Maintains Libya Attack Was Spontaneous Reaction to Anti-Islam Video | Fox News Insider

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Islamic terrorism IS religiously inspired. That does not make the Obama cover story that an obscure video, released three months prior, which had garnered a total of 17 views, was the basis of the attack.

U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice appeared on five different Sunday news shows September 16th and told the nation that “the best information and the best assessment we have today is that in fact this was not a preplanned, premeditated attack…that it was a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired in Cairo as a consequence of the video”

This administration has blatantly lied to the American people, over and over.

US Ambassador Susan Rice Maintains Libya Attack Was Spontaneous Reaction to Anti-Islam Video | Fox News Insider

Why does Fox lie?

Rice disagrees, saying that it was a reaction to the protests on the US Embassy in Cairo as a consequence of the video. She added, “Obviously, we’ll wait for the results of the investigation and we don’t want to jump to conclusions before then.”

The bold text was not added after, it was said prior to the statement.

September 16: Benjamin Netanyahu, Susan Rice, Keith Ellison, Peter King, Bob Woodward, Jeffrey Goldberg, Andrea Mitchell - Meet the Press - Transcripts | NBC News

"GREGORY: Well, let’s talk-- talk about-- well, you talked about this as spontaneous. Can you say definitively that the attacks on-- on our consulate in Libya that killed ambassador Stevens and others there security personnel, that was spontaneous, was it a planned attack? Was there a terrorist element to it?

MS. RICE: Well, let us-- let me tell you the-- the best information we have at present. First of all, there’s an FBI investigation which is ongoing. And we look to that investigation to give us the definitive word as to what transpired. But putting together the best information that we have available to us today our current assessment is that what happened in Benghazi was in fact initially a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired hours before in Cairo, almost a copycat of-- of the demonstrations against our facility in Cairo, which were prompted, of course, by the video.

Furthermore the CIA confirmed that was what the Ambassador was told by them.

According to the CIA account, “The currently available information suggests that the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the U.S. Consulate and subsequently its annex

David Ignatius: Benghazi intelligence revealed - The Washington Post

Hold on there short bus, there is a video of what she said.
Why do YOU lie?

 

[BlindBoo]

US Ambassador Susan Rice Maintains Libya Attack Was Spontaneous Reaction to Anti-Islam Video | Fox News Insider

Why does Fox lie?

Rice disagrees, saying that it was a reaction to the protests on the US Embassy in Cairo as a consequence of the video. She added, “Obviously, we’ll wait for the results of the investigation and we don’t want to jump to conclusions before then.”

The bold text was not added after, it was said prior to the statement.

September 16: Benjamin Netanyahu, Susan Rice, Keith Ellison, Peter King, Bob Woodward, Jeffrey Goldberg, Andrea Mitchell - Meet the Press - Transcripts | NBC News

"GREGORY: Well, let’s talk-- talk about-- well, you talked about this as spontaneous. Can you say definitively that the attacks on-- on our consulate in Libya that killed ambassador Stevens and others there security personnel, that was spontaneous, was it a planned attack? Was there a terrorist element to it?

MS. RICE: Well, let us-- let me tell you the-- the best information we have at present. First of all, there’s an FBI investigation which is ongoing. And we look to that investigation to give us the definitive word as to what transpired. But putting together the best information that we have available to us today our current assessment is that what happened in Benghazi was in fact initially a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired hours before in Cairo, almost a copycat of-- of the demonstrations against our facility in Cairo, which were prompted, of course, by the video.

Furthermore the CIA confirmed that was what the Ambassador was told by them.

According to the CIA account, “The currently available information suggests that the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the U.S. Consulate and subsequently its annex

David Ignatius: Benghazi intelligence revealed - The Washington Post

Hold on there short bus, there is a video of what she said.
Why do YOU lie?

You're correct. Wrong video.

Upon viewing the video however she does qualify it with the fact that there is an investigation before she stated the CIA's information. So they did ommit that part from their story. Makes all the difference. You just can't trust Fox. Well normal people can't anyway.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

House Oversight Committee line to call and voice your opinion, DEMANDING Hearings be IMMEDIATELY scheduled and this President come before the American people, UNDER OATH and answer for his lies.

Phone: (202) 225-5074
2157 Rayburn House Office Building,
Washington, DC 20515
Committee On Oversight & Government Reform

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Why does Fox lie?

Rice disagrees, saying that it was a reaction to the protests on the US Embassy in Cairo as a consequence of the video. She added, “Obviously, we’ll wait for the results of the investigation and we don’t want to jump to conclusions before then.”

The bold text was not added after, it was said prior to the statement.

September 16: Benjamin Netanyahu, Susan Rice, Keith Ellison, Peter King, Bob Woodward, Jeffrey Goldberg, Andrea Mitchell - Meet the Press - Transcripts | NBC News

"GREGORY: Well, let’s talk-- talk about-- well, you talked about this as spontaneous. Can you say definitively that the attacks on-- on our consulate in Libya that killed ambassador Stevens and others there security personnel, that was spontaneous, was it a planned attack? Was there a terrorist element to it?

MS. RICE: Well, let us-- let me tell you the-- the best information we have at present. First of all, there’s an FBI investigation which is ongoing. And we look to that investigation to give us the definitive word as to what transpired. But putting together the best information that we have available to us today our current assessment is that what happened in Benghazi was in fact initially a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired hours before in Cairo, almost a copycat of-- of the demonstrations against our facility in Cairo, which were prompted, of course, by the video.

Furthermore the CIA confirmed that was what the Ambassador was told by them.

According to the CIA account, “The currently available information suggests that the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the U.S. Consulate and subsequently its annex

David Ignatius: Benghazi intelligence revealed - The Washington Post

Hold on there short bus, there is a video of what she said.
Why do YOU lie?

You're correct. Wrong video.

I think you should detract your why does fox lie comment on this one.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Is it your position that the attack could not possibly be BOTH terrorism and religiously inspired??

Those 2 are mutually exclusive??

Islamic terrorism IS religiously inspired. That does not make the Obama cover story that an obscure video, released three months prior, which had garnered a total of 17 views, was the basis of the attack.

U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice appeared on five different Sunday news shows September 16th and told the nation that “the best information and the best assessment we have today is that in fact this was not a preplanned, premeditated attack…that it was a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired in Cairo as a consequence of the video”

This administration has blatantly lied to the American people, over and over.

So Muslim extremist terrorists commit Muslim extremist terror for Muslim extremist reasons,

often related to what they believe are offenses to their religion,

BUT, in case of Benghazi, it is uniquely unreasonable and outrageous to assume that the above might have in any way applied?

...despite the fact that demonstrations and varying degrees of violence were erupting all over the Muslim world and it was known that the movie was the reason...

You're not being logical.

 

[NYcarbineer]

House Oversight Committee line to call and voice your opinion, DEMANDING Hearings be IMMEDIATELY scheduled and this President come before the American people, UNDER OATH and answer for his lies.

Phone: (202) 225-5074
2157 Rayburn House Office Building,
Washington, DC 20515
Committee On Oversight & Government Reform

Yes, another Fast and Furious kangaroo court.

lol

 

[NYcarbineer]

You're such a fucktard.

Obama did lie, and continues to lie.

You know it, but you hold party above the nation and lie to protect your shameful party.

{ The United States condemns, in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. We’re working with the government of Libya to secure our diplomats. I’ve also directed my administration to increase our security at diplomatic posts around the world.

And make no mistake, we will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers who attacked our people. Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths.

We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None.

Directly he attributes the attack to the denigration of religion and senseless violence. Does he mention terror? Yes. Again, from the transcript.

Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks. We mourn with the families who were lost on that day. I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed. And then last night we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.

As Americans let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases lay down their lives for it. Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those, both civilian and military, who represent us around the globe.

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.

But as theologians say in regards to Biblical exegesis, “text without context is a pretext.” And the left’s used of the sole mention of “acts of terror” in defense of Obama’s statement is just that, a pretext.

Saying this statement applies to Benghazi in any way is incomprehensible in light of what Obama was saying preceding it. Using the left’s logic, Obama could claim that he said Benghazi was a significant as 9/11/2001 (I don’t think we can ever refer to just 9/11 again after this year) because he does mention 9/11. }

Parsing Obama’s Benghazi Lie: He Blamed The Video Not Terror | RedState

Is it your position that the attack could not possibly be BOTH terrorism and religiously inspired??

Those 2 are mutually exclusive??

In your mind you see obama walking on water, be honest that's how you see obama and no amount of facts will change that.

Answer the question.

Is it your position that the attack could not possibly be BOTH terrorism and religiously inspired?

HINT:

Bin Laden attacked us on 9/11 because he and his crew saw our troop presence in Saudi Arabia as AN OFFENSE TO ISLAM.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

Just heard that line is VERY VERY BUSY and already being posted and shared on Social Media sites by THOUSANDS! GO America GO!

House Oversight Committee line to call and voice your opinion, DEMANDING Hearings be IMMEDIATELY scheduled and this President come before the American people, UNDER OATH and answer for his lies.

Phone: (202) 225-5074
2157 Rayburn House Office Building,
Washington, DC 20515
Committee On Oversight & Government Reform

I was told we need to call here and give voice to our concerns.

 

[NYcarbineer]

You're such a fucktard.

Obama did lie, and continues to lie.

You know it, but you hold party above the nation and lie to protect your shameful party.

{ The United States condemns, in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. We’re working with the government of Libya to secure our diplomats. I’ve also directed my administration to increase our security at diplomatic posts around the world.

And make no mistake, we will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers who attacked our people. Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths.

We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None.

Directly he attributes the attack to the denigration of religion and senseless violence. Does he mention terror? Yes. Again, from the transcript.

Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks. We mourn with the families who were lost on that day. I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed. And then last night we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.

As Americans let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases lay down their lives for it. Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those, both civilian and military, who represent us around the globe.

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.

But as theologians say in regards to Biblical exegesis, “text without context is a pretext.” And the left’s used of the sole mention of “acts of terror” in defense of Obama’s statement is just that, a pretext.

Saying this statement applies to Benghazi in any way is incomprehensible in light of what Obama was saying preceding it. Using the left’s logic, Obama could claim that he said Benghazi was a significant as 9/11/2001 (I don’t think we can ever refer to just 9/11 again after this year) because he does mention 9/11. }

Parsing Obama’s Benghazi Lie: He Blamed The Video Not Terror | RedState

You refuted your own argument within your argument.

You said that the reference to 'acts of terror' could not possibly be a reference to Benghazi,

but earlier you insisted that the reference 'all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others'

had to be considered a direct and specific reference to Benghazi.

Which is it? Is a plural, generalized reference able to be a direct reference, in context, or not???

In the case you want it to be you say 'yes'. In the case you don't want it to be, you say 'no'.

Clean up your argument please.

What the hell is wrong with your brain? Are you that hung up on Obama? The guy is a fake, a fraud a Muslim a commie. He fucking hates America.

Your inability to address the flagrant flaw in your argument, and your decision to instead froth at the mouth for 4 sentences,

only proves I'm right.

Try again. The flaw in your argument is blatant. It shouldn't be hard for you to see it.

Maybe one of your erudite pals can help you.

 

[Darkwind]

As we can see from the debates, without a teleprompter, Obama's first instinct is to lie when confronted with anything other than, "Yes master".

 

[NYcarbineer]

As we can see from the debates, without a teleprompter, Obama's first instinct is to lie when confronted with anything other than, "Yes master".

Quote the lie.

 

[BlindBoo]

Hold on there short bus, there is a video of what she said.
Why do YOU lie?

You're correct. Wrong video.

I think you should detract your why does fox lie comment on this one.

Actually they did. Even in the video they posted with the story. Rice mentioned the investigaion first, before going over the information the CIA had provided her with.