Why the President's first reaction was to lie about Benghazi.

[Oldstyle]

Well, let's look at the Rose Garden quote for the millionth time:

Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks. We mourned with the families who were lost on that day. I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed. And then last night, we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.As Americans, let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases, lay down their lives for it. Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those both civilian and military who represent us around the globe.
No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America.

Now, please, someone explain to us how there is no mention of Benghazi in the above, that there is only a mention of 9/11/2001. That is Liability's claim, someone, please, make the references to Benghazi magically disappear and prove Liability correct.


-Someone prove to us that the President only mentioned 2001 and never mentioned Benghazi when he was talking about acts of terror.

Someone. Anyone.

Why?

Asshole you refuses to listen or open your idiot ears anyway.

Flip it around you motherfucking moron.

Explain WHY the Idiot in Chief had the UN Ambassador claiming that it was a mob reaction to a fucking video IF the President had already said it was an act of terror.

You can't you fucking dishonest hack imbecile.

Once you admit OBAMA didn't lie, then we can move on to Ambassador Rice.

If President Obama states that he DID say that the attack in Bengazi was carried out by terrorists in his Rose Garden speech then yes, he is indeed lying. At no time in that speech did he ever say that the attack that killed Ambassador Stevens was a terrorist action. You people seem to think that because he used the "acts of terror" in a very broad context that should somehow "count" as Barack Obama's declaring the Bengazi attack to have been carried out by terrorists. The truth is that was NOT the narrative that the White House was pushing that entire first week. The narrative that the American people received OVER AND OVER was that it was a spontaneous demonstration over the YouTube video that turned violent.

In choosing to only present information that supported that narrative and deliberately ignoring both video evidence and eye witness testimony the Administration's story about what happened in Bengazi that night was lie layered upon lie. When you KNOW that there was no demonstration at the US consulate prior to the attack but you put forth a narrative that there was...YOU ARE LYING.

 

[thanatos144]

Woods said Biden came over to his family and asked in a “loud and boisterous” voice, “Did your son always have balls the size of cue balls?”

Woods is father of a dead Navy seal who died in Bengazi........How is that for classy people? By the way the same man said Clinton told him

After apologizing for his loss, Woods said Clinton told him that the U.S. would “make sure that the person who made that film is arrested and prosecuted.”

This is a lying evil administration.

Charles Woods Discusses His Son Tyrone Woods and Benghazi Attack With Glenn Beck | Video | TheBlaze.com

 

[freedombecki]

The truth is killing Bin Laden was never going to make the Islamic jihadis put down their bombs and go home, Bush said after 9/11 that this was on terror would take decades. I believe him.

Obama just sealed the deal that we will not win it by removal of troops in an area his Muslim Brotherhood pals are eager to make a bloodbath of.

In addition to destroying our future with his overspending, Obama has turned the wold to chaos by removing Middle East people in power who kept the jihad extremists at bay with their retaliation methods.

We need to get Obama out of office before he hands over this republic to foreign interests.

We'll wind up like the people of 1776 who had to pay high taxes for no representation whatever in the court of the British King George III. Except the king will convert to Islam as fear makes it grow, just like in Hitler's germany.

They will kill Christians and Jews worldwide when Obama places America in that position. The Democrats don't care because they're just in it for what's in the US Treasury, and they will amscray when that is decimated by them in the next 4 years.

I think putting Obama in power was a bad idea.

And yes, from the look of the State Fair demonstrations in Wisconsin, Iowa and other states filled with yellings like "Get Whitey!" by angered mobs may come if Obama is put out to pasture, but we either live free or we will be put to death by Obama's pals in the Muslim Brotherhood when he gives them power over America through a United Nations one-world schema.

You won't need a burial plot. They'll just dig us all a big hole and dump our mutilated bodies there after we expire.

Civil War II: State Fair Mob Violence

 

[Uncensored2008]

{Take the Libya Shield Brigade, an eastern Libyan militia aligned with the Libyan government. Libya Shield members met the eight U.S. Marines who arrived in Benghazi from Tripoli in the wee hours of Sept. 12, 2012. Libya Shield escorted our Marines to the secret annex -- relying on GPS coordinates the Marines brought with them -- where the survivors of the consulate attack had successfully taken cover. This annex did not come under mortar attack until soon after Libya Shield and the Marines arrived. Coincidence? It was in this barrage, by the way, that ex-SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty were killed.}

Obama in Cahoots With Known Terrorists - Diana West - Page 1

Our people were murdered by Obama's allies.

 

[BlindBoo]

The lie (for the like the umpteenth time [you should give some thought to trying to keep up]) was pretending that the terrorist attack on OUR consulate office in Benghazi was actually just one of those unfortunate Muslim displays of mob outrage when some fucking video defamed the Pedophile Mohammed (PB&J).

And as a response to your pretty much irrelevant aside, I don't care that FDR and Churchill did not make a claim that snuffing Adolf would eliminate the threat of Naziism. Sadly, Pres. Obama is not even as much of a genuine leader as was FDR. For Pres. Obama DID suggest that killing or imprisoning bin Laden WOULD be the thing that would protect America. I already posted that old claim of the then new President.

Go educate yourself

I snipped your incoherent bleating about "going rogue" since it was quite insignificant.

Did Obama minimize the attack as "just one of those unfortunate Muslim displays of mob outrage"? I ask because, frankly, I don't think what you wrote qualifies as a quote from the president. And if it's NOT a quote, then how can it be a lie? And I equally doubt that it's it's an accurate paraphrase of what the president said. I was hoping to get a more substantive response from you. (alas, when will I learn?)

Now, as >I< recall, Obama made it plain to the American people that he was going to make hunting down OBL a priority because he clearly understood that the American people wanted justice (and vengeance) to be served up on the perpetrators of 9-11, and he also understood that OBL's continuing freedom was a PR coop for al Qaeda and a festering wound on the American psyche. President Obama (unlike the previous president) gave his word that he would make looking for (and finding) OBL a priority.

He kept his word. As TR would probably say in this situation, "BULLY"!

Here's another aside. Parentheses are usually placed withIN brackets, not the other way around.

The President is the Chief Executive.

When he has HIS UN Ambassador speak, you twit, the woman speaks ON BEHALF of the Obama Administration.

The President does not have to open his fool mouth to have the ADMINISTRATION position asserted.

He did in this matter through Rice among others.

I know you don't like that fact. But FACT it still is.

He lied.

Aside: Parens can go inside brackets or vice versa. Your dopey attempt at a quibble makes you look even pettier and more ignorant than you already are.

Thanks once again to Mr. Sketch for showing the country his ass on 9-12-2012. So nice of his ardent followers to continue to do the same.

September 16: Benjamin Netanyahu, Susan Rice, Keith Ellison, Peter King, Bob Woodward, Jeffrey Goldberg, Andrea Mitchell - Meet the Press - Transcripts | NBC News

MS. RICE: Well, let us-- let me tell you the-- the best information we have at present. First of all, there’s an FBI investigation which is ongoing. And we look to that investigation to give us the definitive word as to what transpired. But putting together the best information that we have available to us today our current assessment is that what happened in Benghazi was in fact initially a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired hours before in Cairo, almost a copycat of-- of the demonstrations against our facility in Cairo, which were prompted, of course, by the video.

CIA documents back up Rice's description of Benghazi attack

“Talking points” prepared by the CIA on Sept. 15, the same day that Rice taped three television appearances, support her description of the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. Consulate as a reaction to Arab anger about an anti-Muslim video prepared in the United States. According to the CIA account, “The currently available information suggests that the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the U.S. Consulate and subsequently its annex. There are indications that extremists participated in the violent demonstrations.”

A memo prepared by the National Counterterrorism Center on Sept. 14 illustrates the fragmentary nature of the evidence: “

 

[amrchaos]

It is possible that information and intelligence is manhandled by the PR guys for the administration.

Of course, you need proof such as the president believing it was a terrorist attack.

From the information I have gathered, I tend to think that Obama believed the Benghazi attack was linked to terrorism.

 

[Liability]

Did Obama minimize the attack as "just one of those unfortunate Muslim displays of mob outrage"? I ask because, frankly, I don't think what you wrote qualifies as a quote from the president. And if it's NOT a quote, then how can it be a lie? And I equally doubt that it's it's an accurate paraphrase of what the president said. I was hoping to get a more substantive response from you. (alas, when will I learn?)

Now, as >I< recall, Obama made it plain to the American people that he was going to make hunting down OBL a priority because he clearly understood that the American people wanted justice (and vengeance) to be served up on the perpetrators of 9-11, and he also understood that OBL's continuing freedom was a PR coop for al Qaeda and a festering wound on the American psyche. President Obama (unlike the previous president) gave his word that he would make looking for (and finding) OBL a priority.

He kept his word. As TR would probably say in this situation, "BULLY"!

Here's another aside. Parentheses are usually placed withIN brackets, not the other way around.

The President is the Chief Executive.

When he has HIS UN Ambassador speak, you twit, the woman speaks ON BEHALF of the Obama Administration.

The President does not have to open his fool mouth to have the ADMINISTRATION position asserted.

He did in this matter through Rice among others.

I know you don't like that fact. But FACT it still is.

He lied.

Aside: Parens can go inside brackets or vice versa. Your dopey attempt at a quibble makes you look even pettier and more ignorant than you already are.

Thanks once again to Mr. Sketch for showing the country his ass on 9-12-2012. So nice of his ardent followers to continue to do the same.

September 16: Benjamin Netanyahu, Susan Rice, Keith Ellison, Peter King, Bob Woodward, Jeffrey Goldberg, Andrea Mitchell - Meet the Press - Transcripts | NBC News

MS. RICE: Well, let us-- let me tell you the-- the best information we have at present. First of all, there&#8217;s an FBI investigation which is ongoing. And we look to that investigation to give us the definitive word as to what transpired. But putting together the best information that we have available to us today our current assessment is that what happened in Benghazi was in fact initially a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired hours before in Cairo, almost a copycat of-- of the demonstrations against our facility in Cairo, which were prompted, of course, by the video.

CIA documents back up Rice's description of Benghazi attack

&#8220;Talking points&#8221; prepared by the CIA on Sept. 15, the same day that Rice taped three television appearances, support her description of the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. Consulate as a reaction to Arab anger about an anti-Muslim video prepared in the United States. According to the CIA account, &#8220;The currently available information suggests that the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the U.S. Consulate and subsequently its annex. There are indications that extremists participated in the violent demonstrations.&#8221;

A memo prepared by the National Counterterrorism Center on Sept. 14 illustrates the fragmentary nature of the evidence: &#8220;

Cherry picking always "works" for BlandPoo, even though the rest of the world sees right through his transparently fraudulent attempt to provide cover for the President's intentional lie.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Why?

Asshole you refuses to listen or open your idiot ears anyway.

Flip it around you motherfucking moron.

Explain WHY the Idiot in Chief had the UN Ambassador claiming that it was a mob reaction to a fucking video IF the President had already said it was an act of terror.

You can't you fucking dishonest hack imbecile.

Once you admit OBAMA didn't lie, then we can move on to Ambassador Rice.

If President Obama states that he DID say that the attack in Bengazi was carried out by terrorists in his Rose Garden speech then yes, he is indeed lying. At no time in that speech did he ever say that the attack that killed Ambassador Stevens was a terrorist action. You people seem to think that because he used the "acts of terror" in a very broad context that should somehow "count" as Barack Obama's declaring the Bengazi attack to have been carried out by terrorists. The truth is that was NOT the narrative that the White House was pushing that entire first week. The narrative that the American people received OVER AND OVER was that it was a spontaneous demonstration over the YouTube video that turned violent.

In choosing to only present information that supported that narrative and deliberately ignoring both video evidence and eye witness testimony the Administration's story about what happened in Bengazi that night was lie layered upon lie. When you KNOW that there was no demonstration at the US consulate prior to the attack but you put forth a narrative that there was...YOU ARE LYING.

The quote is there in plain English. You can deny the facts all you want, but denying the facts doesn't change them.

We listened to the birthers denying the facts for years, and did that change the facts? NO.

This is what you people do. You deny irrefutable facts over and over and over again, apparently on the belief that eventually people like myself will get tired of stating the facts, and then, you think,

your myth will be established.

 

[NYcarbineer]

What was the lie?

As an aside (a relevant one), did FDR or Churchill ever say or imply that killing Hitler would complete eliminate the Nazi (or German military) threat?

* * * *

The lie (for the like the umpteenth time [you should give some thought to trying to keep up]) was pretending that the terrorist attack on OUR consulate office in Benghazi was actually just one of those unfortunate Muslim displays of mob outrage when some fucking video defamed the Pedophile Mohammed (PB&J).

And as a response to your pretty much irrelevant aside, I don't care that FDR and Churchill did not make a claim that snuffing Adolf would eliminate the threat of Naziism. Sadly, Pres. Obama is not even as much of a genuine leader as was FDR. For Pres. Obama DID suggest that killing or imprisoning bin Laden WOULD be the thing that would protect America. I already posted that old claim of the then new President.

Go educate yourself

I snipped your incoherent bleating about "going rogue" since it was quite insignificant.

Did Obama minimize the attack as "just one of those unfortunate Muslim displays of mob outrage"? I ask because, frankly, I don't think what you wrote qualifies as a quote from the president. And if it's NOT a quote, then how can it be a lie? And I equally doubt that it's it's an accurate paraphrase of what the president said. I was hoping to get a more substantive response from you. (alas, when will I learn?)

Now, as >I< recall, Obama made it plain to the American people that he was going to make hunting down OBL a priority because he clearly understood that the American people wanted justice (and vengeance) to be served up on the perpetrators of 9-11, and he also understood that OBL's continuing freedom was a PR coop for al Qaeda and a festering wound on the American psyche. President Obama (unlike the previous president) gave his word that he would make looking for (and finding) OBL a priority.

He kept his word. As TR would probably say in this situation, "BULLY"!

Here's another aside. Parentheses are usually placed withIN brackets, not the other way around.

We're all still waiting for Liability to quote the President lying in the Rose Garden on September 12th.

He can't, because Liability is the one who lied.

 

[Liability]

The lie (for the like the umpteenth time [you should give some thought to trying to keep up]) was pretending that the terrorist attack on OUR consulate office in Benghazi was actually just one of those unfortunate Muslim displays of mob outrage when some fucking video defamed the Pedophile Mohammed (PB&J).

And as a response to your pretty much irrelevant aside, I don't care that FDR and Churchill did not make a claim that snuffing Adolf would eliminate the threat of Naziism. Sadly, Pres. Obama is not even as much of a genuine leader as was FDR. For Pres. Obama DID suggest that killing or imprisoning bin Laden WOULD be the thing that would protect America. I already posted that old claim of the then new President.

Go educate yourself

I snipped your incoherent bleating about "going rogue" since it was quite insignificant.

Did Obama minimize the attack as "just one of those unfortunate Muslim displays of mob outrage"? I ask because, frankly, I don't think what you wrote qualifies as a quote from the president. And if it's NOT a quote, then how can it be a lie? And I equally doubt that it's it's an accurate paraphrase of what the president said. I was hoping to get a more substantive response from you. (alas, when will I learn?)

Now, as >I< recall, Obama made it plain to the American people that he was going to make hunting down OBL a priority because he clearly understood that the American people wanted justice (and vengeance) to be served up on the perpetrators of 9-11, and he also understood that OBL's continuing freedom was a PR coop for al Qaeda and a festering wound on the American psyche. President Obama (unlike the previous president) gave his word that he would make looking for (and finding) OBL a priority.

He kept his word. As TR would probably say in this situation, "BULLY"!

Here's another aside. Parentheses are usually placed withIN brackets, not the other way around.

We're all still waiting for Liability to quote the President lying in the Rose Garden on September 12th.

He can't, because Liability is the one who lied.

^ another repeat lie from the always fully dishonest Carbuncle.

Contrary to Carbuncle's lie, nobody is "waiting" on me, since I have provided it repeatedly.

The lie was the President's, as you know.

And now the lie is yours.

Ho hum. Nothing new.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Once you admit OBAMA didn't lie, then we can move on to Ambassador Rice.

You're such a fucktard.

Obama did lie, and continues to lie.

You know it, but you hold party above the nation and lie to protect your shameful party.

{ The United States condemns, in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. We’re working with the government of Libya to secure our diplomats. I’ve also directed my administration to increase our security at diplomatic posts around the world.

And make no mistake, we will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers who attacked our people. Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths.

We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None.

Directly he attributes the attack to the denigration of religion and senseless violence. Does he mention terror? Yes. Again, from the transcript.

Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks. We mourn with the families who were lost on that day. I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed. And then last night we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.

As Americans let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases lay down their lives for it. Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those, both civilian and military, who represent us around the globe.

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.

But as theologians say in regards to Biblical exegesis, “text without context is a pretext.” And the left’s used of the sole mention of “acts of terror” in defense of Obama’s statement is just that, a pretext.

Saying this statement applies to Benghazi in any way is incomprehensible in light of what Obama was saying preceding it. Using the left’s logic, Obama could claim that he said Benghazi was a significant as 9/11/2001 (I don’t think we can ever refer to just 9/11 again after this year) because he does mention 9/11. }

Parsing Obama&#8217;s Benghazi Lie: He Blamed The Video Not Terror | RedState

 

[Liability]

Once you admit OBAMA didn't lie, then we can move on to Ambassador Rice.

You're such a fucktard.

Obama did lie, and continues to lie.

You know it, but you hold party above the nation and lie to protect your shameful party.

{ The United States condemns, in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. We’re working with the government of Libya to secure our diplomats. I’ve also directed my administration to increase our security at diplomatic posts around the world.

And make no mistake, we will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers who attacked our people. Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths.

We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None.

Directly he attributes the attack to the denigration of religion and senseless violence. Does he mention terror? Yes. Again, from the transcript.

Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks. We mourn with the families who were lost on that day. I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed. And then last night we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.

As Americans let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases lay down their lives for it. Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those, both civilian and military, who represent us around the globe.

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.

But as theologians say in regards to Biblical exegesis, “text without context is a pretext.” And the left’s used of the sole mention of “acts of terror” in defense of Obama’s statement is just that, a pretext.

Saying this statement applies to Benghazi in any way is incomprehensible in light of what Obama was saying preceding it. Using the left’s logic, Obama could claim that he said Benghazi was a significant as 9/11/2001 (I don’t think we can ever refer to just 9/11 again after this year) because he does mention 9/11. }

Parsing Obama’s Benghazi Lie: He Blamed The Video Not Terror | RedState

It doesn't even take much parsing. All it takes is honesty. This is not something you will be seeing from the likes of Carbuncle. He opposes the truth.

 

[copsnrobbers]

Obama and Hillary lied to Tyrone Woods father while his body was brought to them.

Then Hillary went to Brazil for cover and lied again in her phoney la la la media speech.

Obama cut and run then sent his minions out to lie for him, and HE then lied over and over again himself.

How could any American who knows this vote for him? Any person who would is be beyond shit.

 

[thanatos144]

Obama and Hillary lied to Tyrone Woods father while his body was brought to them.

Then Hillary went to Brazil for cover and lied again in her phoney la la la media speech.

Obama cut and run then sent his minions out to lie for him, and HE then lied over and over again himself.

How could any American who knows this vote for him? Any person who would is be beyond shit.

You would think the voting Americans would have the honor to not vote for Obama after knowing this.....But we both know there will be many times many who will.

 

[naturegirl]

Obama and Hillary lied to Tyrone Woods father while his body was brought to them.

Then Hillary went to Brazil for cover and lied again in her phoney la la la media speech.

Obama cut and run then sent his minions out to lie for him, and HE then lied over and over again himself.

How could any American who knows this vote for him? Any person who would is be beyond shit.

I will never understand how anyone could back this traitor. He's more interested in saving his sorry ass so he can get reelected than to tell the families of these slain Americans the truth. The lies he told about the film, the lies Hillary told about the film, they lies they used to cover up this terrorist attack are horrendous. Yet they still find a way to justify a vote for him. God help us if too many people actually think this way.

 

[Oldstyle]

Did Obama minimize the attack as "just one of those unfortunate Muslim displays of mob outrage"? I ask because, frankly, I don't think what you wrote qualifies as a quote from the president. And if it's NOT a quote, then how can it be a lie? And I equally doubt that it's it's an accurate paraphrase of what the president said. I was hoping to get a more substantive response from you. (alas, when will I learn?)

Now, as >I< recall, Obama made it plain to the American people that he was going to make hunting down OBL a priority because he clearly understood that the American people wanted justice (and vengeance) to be served up on the perpetrators of 9-11, and he also understood that OBL's continuing freedom was a PR coop for al Qaeda and a festering wound on the American psyche. President Obama (unlike the previous president) gave his word that he would make looking for (and finding) OBL a priority.

He kept his word. As TR would probably say in this situation, "BULLY"!

Here's another aside. Parentheses are usually placed withIN brackets, not the other way around.

The President is the Chief Executive.

When he has HIS UN Ambassador speak, you twit, the woman speaks ON BEHALF of the Obama Administration.

The President does not have to open his fool mouth to have the ADMINISTRATION position asserted.

He did in this matter through Rice among others.

I know you don't like that fact. But FACT it still is.

He lied.

Aside: Parens can go inside brackets or vice versa. Your dopey attempt at a quibble makes you look even pettier and more ignorant than you already are.

Thanks once again to Mr. Sketch for showing the country his ass on 9-12-2012. So nice of his ardent followers to continue to do the same.

September 16: Benjamin Netanyahu, Susan Rice, Keith Ellison, Peter King, Bob Woodward, Jeffrey Goldberg, Andrea Mitchell - Meet the Press - Transcripts | NBC News

MS. RICE: Well, let us-- let me tell you the-- the best information we have at present. First of all, there’s an FBI investigation which is ongoing. And we look to that investigation to give us the definitive word as to what transpired. But putting together the best information that we have available to us today our current assessment is that what happened in Benghazi was in fact initially a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired hours before in Cairo, almost a copycat of-- of the demonstrations against our facility in Cairo, which were prompted, of course, by the video.

CIA documents back up Rice's description of Benghazi attack

“Talking points” prepared by the CIA on Sept. 15, the same day that Rice taped three television appearances, support her description of the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. Consulate as a reaction to Arab anger about an anti-Muslim video prepared in the United States. According to the CIA account, “The currently available information suggests that the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the U.S. Consulate and subsequently its annex. There are indications that extremists participated in the violent demonstrations.”

A memo prepared by the National Counterterrorism Center on Sept. 14 illustrates the fragmentary nature of the evidence: “

Then you know what, Boo? Whoever put together that CIA "talking point" on Sept. 15 is as big a liar as Obama, Clinton, and Rice because we now know that the Bengazi embassy attack wasn't "spontaneous" within hours of it taking place. I'd like to see a Congressional investigation into exactly who it was that came up with that "talking point" and if the Administration put pressure on them to reach that conclusion. The more layers of this "onion" that gets peeled away the more it smells to high heavens.

 

[copsnrobbers]

Obama and Hillary lied to Tyrone Woods father while his body was brought to them.

Then Hillary went to Brazil for cover and lied again in her phoney la la la media speech.

Obama cut and run then sent his minions out to lie for him, and HE then lied over and over again himself.

How could any American who knows this vote for him? Any person who would is be beyond shit.

I will never understand how anyone could back this traitor. He's more interested in saving his sorry ass so he can get reelected than to tell the families of these slain Americans the truth. The lies he told about the film, the lies Hillary told about the film, they lies they used to cover up this terrorist attack are horrendous. Yet they still find a way to justify a vote for him. God help us if too many people actually think this way.

There was no obvious reason for him deny help, not to send help or say we were attacked.
Why didn't they? What did the ambassador know. This will prove to go beyond negligence or ignorance. This is a massive cover up.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Once you admit OBAMA didn't lie, then we can move on to Ambassador Rice.

You're such a fucktard.

Obama did lie, and continues to lie.

You know it, but you hold party above the nation and lie to protect your shameful party.

{ The United States condemns, in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. We’re working with the government of Libya to secure our diplomats. I’ve also directed my administration to increase our security at diplomatic posts around the world.

And make no mistake, we will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers who attacked our people. Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths.

We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None.

Directly he attributes the attack to the denigration of religion and senseless violence. Does he mention terror? Yes. Again, from the transcript.

Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks. We mourn with the families who were lost on that day. I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed. And then last night we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.

As Americans let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases lay down their lives for it. Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those, both civilian and military, who represent us around the globe.

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.

But as theologians say in regards to Biblical exegesis, “text without context is a pretext.” And the left’s used of the sole mention of “acts of terror” in defense of Obama’s statement is just that, a pretext.

Saying this statement applies to Benghazi in any way is incomprehensible in light of what Obama was saying preceding it. Using the left’s logic, Obama could claim that he said Benghazi was a significant as 9/11/2001 (I don’t think we can ever refer to just 9/11 again after this year) because he does mention 9/11. }

Parsing Obama’s Benghazi Lie: He Blamed The Video Not Terror | RedState

Is it your position that the attack could not possibly be BOTH terrorism and religiously inspired??

Those 2 are mutually exclusive??

 

[NYcarbineer]

Once you admit OBAMA didn't lie, then we can move on to Ambassador Rice.

You're such a fucktard.

Obama did lie, and continues to lie.

You know it, but you hold party above the nation and lie to protect your shameful party.

{ The United States condemns, in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. We’re working with the government of Libya to secure our diplomats. I’ve also directed my administration to increase our security at diplomatic posts around the world.

And make no mistake, we will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers who attacked our people. Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths.

We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None.

Directly he attributes the attack to the denigration of religion and senseless violence. Does he mention terror? Yes. Again, from the transcript.

Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks. We mourn with the families who were lost on that day. I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed. And then last night we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.

As Americans let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases lay down their lives for it. Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those, both civilian and military, who represent us around the globe.

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.

But as theologians say in regards to Biblical exegesis, “text without context is a pretext.” And the left’s used of the sole mention of “acts of terror” in defense of Obama’s statement is just that, a pretext.

Saying this statement applies to Benghazi in any way is incomprehensible in light of what Obama was saying preceding it. Using the left’s logic, Obama could claim that he said Benghazi was a significant as 9/11/2001 (I don’t think we can ever refer to just 9/11 again after this year) because he does mention 9/11. }

Parsing Obama’s Benghazi Lie: He Blamed The Video Not Terror | RedState

You refuted your own argument within your argument.

You said that the reference to 'acts of terror' could not possibly be a reference to Benghazi,

but earlier you insisted that the reference 'all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others'

had to be considered a direct and specific reference to Benghazi.

Which is it? Is a plural, generalized reference able to be a direct reference, in context, or not???

In the case you want it to be you say 'yes'. In the case you don't want it to be, you say 'no'.

Clean up your argument please.

 

[copsnrobbers]

Once you admit OBAMA didn't lie, then we can move on to Ambassador Rice.

You're such a fucktard.

Obama did lie, and continues to lie.

You know it, but you hold party above the nation and lie to protect your shameful party.

{ The United States condemns, in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. We’re working with the government of Libya to secure our diplomats. I’ve also directed my administration to increase our security at diplomatic posts around the world.

And make no mistake, we will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers who attacked our people. Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths.

We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None.

Directly he attributes the attack to the denigration of religion and senseless violence. Does he mention terror? Yes. Again, from the transcript.

Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks. We mourn with the families who were lost on that day. I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed. And then last night we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.

As Americans let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases lay down their lives for it. Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those, both civilian and military, who represent us around the globe.

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.

But as theologians say in regards to Biblical exegesis, “text without context is a pretext.” And the left’s used of the sole mention of “acts of terror” in defense of Obama’s statement is just that, a pretext.

Saying this statement applies to Benghazi in any way is incomprehensible in light of what Obama was saying preceding it. Using the left’s logic, Obama could claim that he said Benghazi was a significant as 9/11/2001 (I don’t think we can ever refer to just 9/11 again after this year) because he does mention 9/11. }

Parsing Obama’s Benghazi Lie: He Blamed The Video Not Terror | RedState

You refuted your own argument within your argument.

You said that the reference to 'acts of terror' could not possibly be a reference to Benghazi,

but earlier you insisted that the reference 'all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others'

had to be considered a direct and specific reference to Benghazi.

Which is it? Is a plural, generalized reference able to be a direct reference, in context, or not???

In the case you want it to be you say 'yes'. In the case you don't want it to be, you say 'no'.

Clean up your argument please.

What the hell is wrong with your brain? Are you that hung up on Obama? The guy is a fake, a fraud a Muslim a commie. He fucking hates America.