Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Still no one has answered specifically what Romney would do to fix the ME. It stands to reason if those who think Obama had no experience 4 years ago think he is doing a bad job, what makes you think Romney with no experience will do a good job? He is using Bush's foreign policy advisers so should he start another war or exactly what?
Lightweight? He's a walking Blooper Reel.
Lightweight? He's a walking Blooper Reel.
IF Romney is elected he will probably ditch the Vichy Americans and govern from the center. PRyan will do whatever it takes to get media coverage, and bow to Romney on the actual issue at hand. PRyan is a PROFESSIONAL butt kisser.
His ideas range from vague to ill-informed to downright dangerous
If that's the criteria you're using then he's a domestic policy lightweight, too.
I think a better question would be, what would Romney be better at?
The answer?
Creating more jobs.. IN CHINA, INDIA AND PAKISTAN! Outsourcing!
Increasing the military budget so we can have more wars!
Giving the rich more tax breaks and loop holes!
I still haven't heard Romney or any of his supporters say what Romney would do differently in the middle east.
What is Romney's position on drone attacks (he says Obama is weak and lacks resolve, yet bin Laden and many al Qaeda leaders are dead), Afghanistan? He wants to defeat the Taliban not negotiate. Does this mean we leave 10's of thousands of troops there then?
Why Romney Is a Foreign Policy Lightweight
His ideas range from vague to ill-informed to downright dangerous
...Second, in this election in particular, Mitt Romneys statements on foreign policy range from vague to ill-informed to downright dangerous.
Does Romney believe the things that hes said about arms control, Russia, the Middle East, the defense budget, and the rest? Who can say? He has no experience on any of these issues. But his advisers do; they represent, mainly, the Dick Cheney wing of the Republican Party (some, notably John Bolton, veer well to the right of even that). While not all presidents wind up following their advisers, Romney has placed his byline atop some of his coteries most egregious argumentsnot least, several op-ed pieces against President Obamas New START with Russia, pieces that rank as the most ignorant Ive read in nearly 40 years of following the nuclear debate.
In any case, Romney does not explain what he would have done differently in Obamas place. Would he have stood shoulder to shoulder with our old ally, Mubarak? (That would have served Americas image very badly and wouldnt have saved Mubaraks hide in the end.) Would he have poured billions of dollars in aid and investment into Egypt at the first sign of Mubaraks fall? (Extremely doubtful.) Would he have demanded that the military turn over power more completely to the parliament? (If so, how?)
LOL, and Obama A JUNIOR Senator of ONE TERM was some HEAVEY weight at Foreign policy when he became king...
as we see today, NOT
LOL, and Obama A JUNIOR Senator of ONE TERM was some HEAVEY weight at Foreign policy when he became king...
as we see today, NOT
Obama served on the Senate foreign relations Comittee and you still have no clue what a Junior Senator is
LOL, and Obama A JUNIOR Senator of ONE TERM was some HEAVEY weight at Foreign policy when he became king...
as we see today, NOT
Obama served on the Senate foreign relations Comittee and you still have no clue what a Junior Senator is
ooooooooooooooo, I'm impressed
Obama served on the Senate foreign relations Comittee and you still have no clue what a Junior Senator is
ooooooooooooooo, I'm impressed
Ha...Ha... What would impress you Stefunny is most certainly a very deep subject for a shallow mind.
ooooooooooooooo, I'm impressed
Ha...Ha... What would impress you Stefunny is most certainly a very deep subject for a shallow mind.
stick with the topic or don't
Ha...Ha... What would impress you Stefunny is most certainly a very deep subject for a shallow mind.
stick with the topic or don't
I laid out a fairly concise post on what I think about Romney's statement on "War with the Taliban". Care to comment on it? Or are you too busy being impressed with cute "puppy" videos...
Obama served on the Senate foreign relations Comittee and you still have no clue what a Junior Senator is
ooooooooooooooo, I'm impressed
Ha...Ha... What would impress you Stefunny is most certainly a very deep subject for a shallow mind.
lol, Romney isn't taking (that part) of the world seriously.. Like this administration IS..?
But if Romney would speak out on things, we get you lefties whining he is OVERSTEPPING HIS BOUNDS..there is no middle ground with you liberals...
vote this administration OUT, we are seeing Obama wasn't up to the task in Foreign policy..
lets just hope it doesn't come onto our home front, NEXT
You ability to reduce complex problems to small dribbles of drool is breathtaking.. Thanks for the input.
ooooooooooooooo, I'm impressed
Ha...Ha... What would impress you Stefunny is most certainly a very deep subject for a shallow mind.
Of course you are aware that only one Senator out of one hundred has more seniority than a Junior Senator
Romney has the same policy as Bush
Diplomacy is for pussies
Attack first, find a reason later
My way or the highway
America is exceptional, we make no mistakes and you guys must do as we say
