Why Michael Drejka (The Clearwater Shooter) will Cop A Plea.

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by The Professor, Aug 19, 2018.

  1. miketx
    Offline

    miketx Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2015
    Messages:
    53,124
    Thanks Received:
    6,012
    Trophy Points:
    1,870
    Ratings:
    +60,642
    Now the liars says that standing there talking to a woman is attacking her. The only reason they are prosecuting him is to keep the black savages from burning down the town.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. miketx
    Offline

    miketx Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2015
    Messages:
    53,124
    Thanks Received:
    6,012
    Trophy Points:
    1,870
    Ratings:
    +60,642
    There was no irrational fear. After he was assaulted he was in fear. Any normal person would be.
     
  3. JoeB131
    Offline

    JoeB131 Diamond Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2011
    Messages:
    102,247
    Thanks Received:
    8,633
    Trophy Points:
    2,055
    Location:
    Chicago, Chicago, that Toddling Town
    Ratings:
    +24,192
    Hey, if burning down the town is the only way to get White people to act right, that's what we'll end up with.

    Here's a crazy idea. How about prosecuting thugs with guns or rogue cops before anyone has to burn anything down.

    He wasn't standing there talking to her.. he was screaming at her manically over a non-important issue.
     
  4. miketx
    Offline

    miketx Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2015
    Messages:
    53,124
    Thanks Received:
    6,012
    Trophy Points:
    1,870
    Ratings:
    +60,642
    Now the liar says he was screaming maniacally in a video with no audio. He wants the town burnt down too it seems. I don't see any rogue cops in the video. All I saw was a criminal shove man violently to the ground. Global warming?
     
  5. JoeB131
    Offline

    JoeB131 Diamond Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2011
    Messages:
    102,247
    Thanks Received:
    8,633
    Trophy Points:
    2,055
    Location:
    Chicago, Chicago, that Toddling Town
    Ratings:
    +24,192
    Buddy, you are babbling.

    Frankly, I'd like to see black folks get justice without having to burn shit down.

    Then I remembered I live in the United States, where black folks have had to fight for every inch of dignity they have.
     
  6. The Professor
    Online

    The Professor Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    15,338
    Thanks Received:
    22,423
    Trophy Points:
    2,405
    Ratings:
    +25,810
    No evidence? You've got to be kidding. There was a video of the entire encounter so each juror will be an eyewitness to the shooting. The video is sufficient to convict the defendant, but there is other evidence (as I pointed out) including the following (I already provided a link):

    “One incident reportedly occurred in the same parking lot of the Circle A store 3 months before McGlockton was shot. A septic truck driver parked in a handicapped spot, was confronted by Drejka. According to the affidavit, Drejka threatened to shoot the driver before he left in his truck, shouting racial slurs at the driver. Drejka then called the driver's boss to complain and ending the call by reportedly saying he was 'lucky he didn't blow his employee's head off.'”

    Finally you say, “ Law Enforcement investigated and made statements on the record it was lawful self-defense.” It was the sheriff who came to this conclusion, and I fully explained why the man didn't know what he was talking about. This is what the sheriff said (I already provided a link):

    "Stand Your Ground allows for a subjective belief by the person that they are in harm's way....We don't get to substitute our judgment for Drejka's judgment …. The question is not what I would do, what you would do, what the public would do, what someone else would do …. What really matters, is the person's subjective determination of the circumstance they were in and the fear that they had.”

    Well, the sheriff was wrong. The law does not allow the use of deadly force when one subjectively believes it is necessary; instead, it provides that deadly force is allowed only when one reasonably believes it is necessary and the jury gets to determine what is and what is not reasonable. The sheriff's interpretation of the law is both uninformed and illogical. I can only wonder how the sheriff can determine one's subjective state of mind. Apparently he relies solely upon what the person tells him! This has led some posters to believe that in Florida a person could kill someone and get away with it merely by claiming he believed it was necessary for self-defense. That's not the way we do things in my home state of Florida.

    The sheriff does not have a doctorate in law. I do and I know what I am talking about. Of greater importance is that the State Attorney who decided to arrest the defendant has graduated from law school and passed the Florida Bar. You place a lot of emphasis on what a law enforcement officer said, but seem to ignore what true legal experts have opined. Some of you have stated that the State Attorney must have had a political motive, but ignore the fact that the sheriff may have had political motives as well. At any rate, the sheriff's interpretation of the law was complete nonsense. I thought it was hilarious.

    I believe that the defendant acted out of malice, not in self-defense. I also believe, based upon the evidence, that race was an issue. I think a jury will agree in the unlikely event the defendant is foolish enough to demand a trial. I can almost smell a plea agreement.
     
  7. Flash
    Offline

    Flash Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2014
    Messages:
    14,448
    Thanks Received:
    4,039
    Trophy Points:
    390
    Location:
    Florida
    Ratings:
    +33,611
    You are correct.

    Having a discussion with a woman about illegally parking in a handicap spot is not justification for the boyfriend to attack.

    Once that asshole attacked he was responsible for the outcome. If some dickhead attacks me like that they had better be prepared to face the consequences.

    Blacks never take responsibility for their actions, do they? They have an entitlement mentality. "My baby didndunutin".

    The Sheriff was correct in not charging the shooter. The government filth are the ones that are trying to appease the Blacks by kicking the can down the road to a jury and that is despicable.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. Flash
    Offline

    Flash Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2014
    Messages:
    14,448
    Thanks Received:
    4,039
    Trophy Points:
    390
    Location:
    Florida
    Ratings:
    +33,611
    Moon Bats want it be that Blacks can do anything damn thing they please and Whites can never protect themselves.

    That is the America theses asshole demand.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. JakeStarkey
    Offline

    JakeStarkey BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    166,426
    Thanks Received:
    14,930
    Trophy Points:
    2,165
    Ratings:
    +51,084
    "Once that asshole attacked he was responsible for the outcome" is what the jury will consider.

    The fact the victim was backing up in plenty of time for the shooter to perceive he was not a threat is going to send said shooter to the slammer.
     
  10. miketx
    Offline

    miketx Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2015
    Messages:
    53,124
    Thanks Received:
    6,012
    Trophy Points:
    1,870
    Ratings:
    +60,642
    Famous last words. You can never predict what a jury will do, and you have not heard any evidence. But that isn't surprising, most libs don't need evidence to find guilt. The video will be a large part of the evidence against him, but not all.
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

mixhael drejka innocent