Why is Ted Cruz afraid to debate Cenk Uygur?

Had he thought for one moment that Cruz would accept, he'd never make the offer.
That’s a typically moronic statement. He is making the offer. If Cruz accepts and Cenk backs down he would lose all credibility, and be like you.
Cenk has creditability ? He's trying to be like Shapiro and he's not even in the same league, hell Shapiro is The Masters and Uygur is like putt putt.
 
LMAO. Shapiro annihilated poor Cenk when they debated. He needs to step down in weight class and go after Teddy.
Then what’s Cruz afraid of? Seems like an easy win for a "conservative" like Rafael to strike a blow against Liberalism and show why it’s so horrible.

Maybe he’s a phony?
You do realize that while Shapiro's offer was genuine, this clowns offer is a publicity stunt, right? Even the leftard media caught that one.
They’re both publicity stunts. Cenk’s is offered to show how absurd Shapiro’s is. But Cenk actually has more legitimacy considering the popularity of his show, and Rafael’s self-promoting bullshit of being such an intellectual.


Popularity of what show, I've never heard of this twerp, I doubt Senator Cruz has either.

.
 
Cenk's show is no longer popular.
200 million views a month.
Not even remotely close.
Probably not but a hell of a lot more than Shapiro. Hence, Cenk has a more legitimate demand for a debate with Raphael Cruz.
The young turks | Youtube Statistics / Analytics | Trackalytics

upload_2018-8-17_18-42-0.png
 
Cant wait to see the USMB "conservatives" twist themselves into pretzels. Anyone have any mustard? :auiqs.jpg:


Pretzels? Ted Cruz has won at the circuit court and supreme court.... you asshats don't really know who Ted Cruz is.... you just suck up whatever jimmy kimmel, and colbert tell you.....try learning about the man, you will post with more intelligence if you do...

He isn't afraid to debate that guy.... he doesn't want to waste his time....

Ted Cruz - Wikipedia

Cruz served as lead counsel for the state and successfully defended the multiple litigation challenges to the 2003 Texas congressional redistricting plan in state and federal district courts and before the U.S. Supreme Court, which was decided 5–4 in his favor in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry.[39][56]

Cruz also successfully defended, in Medellin v. Texas, the State of Texas against an attempt to re-open the cases of 51 Mexican nationals, all of whom were convicted of murder in the United States and were on death row.[35][39][41][49] With the support of the George W. Bush Administration, the petitioners argued that the United States had violated the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations by failing to notify the convicted nationals of their opportunity to receive legal aid from the Mexican consulate.[44][57] They based their case on a decision of the International Court of Justice in the Avena case which ruled that by failing to allow access to the Mexican consulate, the US had breached its obligations under the Convention.[58] Texas won the case in a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court holding that ICJ decisions were not binding in domestic law and that the President had no power to enforce them.[44][57]

Michael Wayne Haley was arrested for stealing a calculator from Walmart in 1997.[59] Because Haley had two prior convictions for theft, as well as prior felony convictions for delivery of a controlled substance and attempted robbery, he was sentenced as a habitual offender under Texas law to sixteen and a half years in prison. It later came to light that Haley's robbery offense occurred three days before his conviction on the controlled substance charge was finalized, so the habitual offender statute might not have applied. The habitual offender issue was discovered after Haley had exhausted his appeals. As Solicitor General, Cruz declined to vacate the sentence saying "I think justice is being done because he had a full and fair trial and an opportunity to raise his errors."[60] The Supreme Court later remanded the case to lower courts based on Haley's ineffective assistance of counsel claim. During oral argument, Cruz conceded that Haley had a very strong argument for ineffective assistance of counsel since Haley's attorney failed to recognize the sentencing error and that he would not move to have Haley re-incarcerated during the appeal process.[60] After remand, Haley was re-sentenced to "time served".[61]

Cruz was named by American Lawyer magazine as one of the 50 Best Litigators under 45 in America in 2008,[48][62] by The National Law Journal as one of the 50 Most Influential Minority Lawyers in America also in 2008,[63][64] and in October 2010 by Texas Lawyer as one of the 25 Greatest Texas Lawyers of the Past Quarter Century.[65][66]
 
Cenk's show is no longer popular.
200 million views a month.
Not even remotely close.
Probably not but a hell of a lot more than Shapiro. Hence, Cenk has a more legitimate demand for a debate with Raphael Cruz.
The young turks | Youtube Statistics / Analytics | Trackalytics

View attachment 211069
The Young Turks doesn’t get 100,000 views a day, much less 1,000,000.

Cenk is propped up by social media and search engines and he still is losing support every day while conservative channels are popping up out of nowhere with much more professional and intellectual content than the Young Turks.

The right is going to own the internet with its own social media platforms, and when that happens the left will be forever extinguished.
 
You all realize, I hope, that the more you call Cenk Uygur stupid the worse Rafael Cruz looks for running from him, don’t you?


What are you, fucking 3 years old?

.
Why would Raphael run from a stupid person? He's clearly afraid to face any questions about Republican policy.
Because Cenk is a joke.

He had a monopoly on internet political talk shows and now he has lost that monopoly and he endlessly whines about that.
 
LMAO. Shapiro annihilated poor Cenk when they debated. He needs to step down in weight class and go after Teddy.
Because a conservative said so.
Because Cenk can’t defeat a child in a debate.

Google it for yourself. I am not a “conservative”. Not everyone who disagrees with you is a conservative. They just disagree.
You quoted the wrong post.
 

Forum List

Back
Top