Why is Sarah supporting Newt?

past mistakes and minor gaffes blown up by the media make it impossible for him to earn the nomination. Media picks Presidents, not the people.

***************************
Ethics violations that cost him the position of Speaker of the House are mistakes & minor gaffes? You do realize this the UNITED STATES Congress?
***************************
I'm surprised it wasn't Sancto.

Didn't cost the President why would it cost him?
*******************************************
Ethics violations forced Nixon's resignation, the other choice was TRIAL. He did what was best for the country, as did Ford.
 
That's because MOST of Obama's past was squelched in '07/'08...

On purpose.

He still has YET to release his records.
__________________
OF WHAT T? Do you really want his 5th grade report card? I want to know what the candidates got on the SAT, but accept that my desire does reflect public interest.
 
past mistakes and minor gaffes blown up by the media make it impossible for him to earn the nomination. Media picks Presidents, not the people.

***************************
Ethics violations that cost him the position of Speaker of the House are mistakes & minor gaffes? You do realize this the UNITED STATES Congress?
***************************
I'm surprised it wasn't Sancto.

Didn't cost the President why would it cost him?

That's because MOST of Obama's past was squelched in '07/'08...

On purpose.

He still has YET to release his records.

Quite frankly, I don't expect him to release them this year either. So we need to just accept that and attack his record as President. Hold Him accountable for what he has done and what he wants to do this nation. We can beat him based on idealogy if we are focused. But my guess is he wants people distracted with him not releasing his record so he can try to marginalize us by claiming we are some conspiracy nutjobs.
 
Didn't cost the President why would it cost him?

That's because MOST of Obama's past was squelched in '07/'08...

On purpose.

He still has YET to release his records.

Quite frankly, I don't expect him to release them this year either. So we need to just accept that and attack his record as President. Hold Him accountable for what he has done and what he wants to do this nation. We can beat him based on idealogy if we are focused. But my guess is he wants people distracted with him not releasing his record so he can try to marginalize us by claiming we are some conspiracy nutjobs.

Precisely.
 
He's easily the most intelligent person we would see on either side of the ticket this year, past mistakes and minor gaffes blown up by the media make it impossible for him to earn the nomination. Media picks Presidents, not the people.

Really? The media is the one that goes to the voting booths and casts millions of votes?

No, they just control the timing, the way and the 'spin' on information about those running.

With the advent of "conservative" talk radio, Foxnews, conservative web sites, conservative social media, forums such as this, etc. that crap about blaming their losses on "the media" aka "LMSM" is weak and played out. Was "the media" to blame for the republican "2010 victory", how come "the media" didn't control that race?
 
He's easily the most intelligent person we would see on either side of the ticket this year, past mistakes and minor gaffes blown up by the media make it impossible for him to earn the nomination. Media picks Presidents, not the people.

LOLOLz, Newt is not a smart guy... He says stuff that gets stupid people to stand up and spit with anger is all.

Obama is not a smart guy either... Theya re both very divisive and that is bad for our country.
 
He's easily the most intelligent person we would see on either side of the ticket this year, past mistakes and minor gaffes blown up by the media make it impossible for him to earn the nomination. Media picks Presidents, not the people.

Actually, Newt is the best debater by far. He is the most adept at backroom, cutthroat politics. And he probably understands more how Guvment works and doesn't work than any of the others. But is carrying far too much baggage to be taken seriously.

I agree with Jillian to a degree. Palin never does anything unless it will benefit her. I expect the worse thing that could happen for Palin's political future would be for Romney to wrap up the GOP nomination. She is hoping Newt can win some states in the south and create chaos in the Republican Party. Honestly, that is her only chance to have any influence at the convention.

Why do you people keep saying stupid shit. newt is a horrid debater. Newt can get a room full of Republicans to scream "fuck Obama!!" Grats... Now say that shit in the GE and watch him lose by such a fucking mind numbing landslide that the Republican party tries to scratch Newt out of the history books.

Newt’s answer to every single question.
Reagan
Obama is a socialist
Newt’s big Government plan
Obama’s big Government plan sucks compared to my grandiose ideas
God
Family
We must defeat Obama…

Roaring crowd of idiots over talking points and sloghans.

Main issue for Newt in a debate is he lies non stop, and when he is caught the crowd is like ................................ awwwwww fuuuuuck....
 
Last edited:

Are you really surprised? The only one of the four republican candidates I would be surprised that she supported would be Ron Paul. She and the majority of the Tea Party people in my opinion, are neocon/social conservative republicans with a different name.

I thought Ron Paul was one of the originators of the Tea Party movement? They share certain passions and ideals. Has the Tea Party morphed into just another muted segment of the Republican Party? It seems the fire and brimestone of the baggers has been replaced by a submissive passivity that is hardly leaving an image in any political poll. They are allowing a moderate at heart to grasp the golden ring of the GOP. There is no one from their ranks who is even remotely close to challenging Mitt.

IS THE TEA PARTY DEAD?

:eek:
 
Really? The media is the one that goes to the voting booths and casts millions of votes?

No, they just control the timing, the way and the 'spin' on information about those running.

With the advent of "conservative" talk radio, Foxnews, conservative web sites, conservative social media, forums such as this, etc. that crap about blaming their losses on "the media" aka "LMSM" is weak and played out. Was "the media" to blame for the republican "2010 victory", how come "the media" didn't control that race?

I agree, was it the liberal Media that got Bush elected 2x and a Republican congress...?
 
i disagree with your second point because that could be said about any politician but your first point is very intriguing.

fair enough about my second point. i think some are more altruistic than others. but i see where you're coming from.


on the other hand though, If she really wanted the nomination why wouldn't she just run? She would pry be the front runner. I don't personally like her because I think her experience level is sub par but I think she'd still be the front runner.

because that would have required that she do the debate circuit and get scrutinized. she didn't do so well with that last time. plus, she was able to keep collecting her salary and didn't have to give up her broadcasting job.

i don't like her because i think someone who says there are "pro america parts of the country" has no business being in the white house in any capacity. i also think she's ignorant of basic things that anyone who aspires to the big job should know.
 

Are you really surprised? The only one of the four republican candidates I would be surprised that she supported would be Ron Paul. She and the majority of the Tea Party people in my opinion, are neocon/social conservative republicans with a different name.

I thought Ron Paul was one of the originators of the Tea Party movement? They share certain passions and ideals. Has the Tea Party morphed into just another muted segment of the Republican Party? It seems the fire and brimestone of the baggers has been replaced by a submissive passivity that is hardly leaving an image in any political poll. They are allowing a moderate at heart to grasp the golden ring of the GOP. There is no one from their ranks who is even remotely close to challenging Mitt.

IS THE TEA PARTY DEAD?

:eek:

I think the TP is alive as it always was... The TP has no rules on who can be in it, so a huge amount of the Reps just said "I'm a TP guy!!" Thing is they were still the same old Neocons as before the TP came to be.

The Ron Paul part of the TP has grown, but I don't think they were ever people that cared about being a "TP" club.
 

Are you really surprised? The only one of the four republican candidates I would be surprised that she supported would be Ron Paul. She and the majority of the Tea Party people in my opinion, are neocon/social conservative republicans with a different name.

I thought Ron Paul was one of the originators of the Tea Party movement? They share certain passions and ideals. Has the Tea Party morphed into just another muted segment of the Republican Party? It seems the fire and brimestone of the baggers has been replaced by a submissive passivity that is hardly leaving an image in any political poll. They are allowing a moderate at heart to grasp the golden ring of the GOP. There is no one from their ranks who is even remotely close to challenging Mitt.

IS THE TEA PARTY DEAD?

:eek:

He was. In my opinion it has, just look at the people they have endorsed, do they even have a similar ideology to Ron Paul?
 
No, they just control the timing, the way and the 'spin' on information about those running.

With the advent of "conservative" talk radio, Foxnews, conservative web sites, conservative social media, forums such as this, etc. that crap about blaming their losses on "the media" aka "LMSM" is weak and played out. Was "the media" to blame for the republican "2010 victory", how come "the media" didn't control that race?

I agree, was it the liberal Media that got Bush elected 2x and a Republican congress...?

It seems they only use that "media excuse" when they lose. ;)
 
Because her nutty fundie religious beliefs make her hate Catholics and Mormons.

Newt's a catholic. I dont think your premise follows.

Her issues with Santorum isnt Catholicism. It's Statements Santorum made about her to create conflict between them, from what Im told.

No idea why she doesnt care for Romney. I doubt Mormonism has anything to do with it though. Probably more Romneycare.
 

Forum List

Back
Top