Why is Harris Supporting Certain “Insurrectionists” when Democrats Jail other “Insurrectionists”?

Lisa558

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 2021
36,318
38,146
2,788
Once again, hypocrisy is not a strong enough word.

The 1/6 protestors are languishing in jail over the charge that they impeded an official proceeding, which is exactly what the Tennessee protestors did. Yet our incompetent idiot of a VP was down there railing against “censorship” in the latter case - when she rightly should have been with the families of the victims of the trans-monster - while supporting the arrest and imprisonment of the 1/6 protestors who did the same.

1) Why is impeding an official proceeding to be defended when it’s by leftists, yet charged as a crime and punished by jail when it’s by righties?

2) Can anyone think of a stronger word than “hypocrite’?

 
The Dems are political first. It is their only priority. They have decided to become pure fascists in order to keep power. Trump winning scared the shit out of them, so now they are full Nazi.

We are living in Germany in the 1930s.
 
1) The Grandma undergoing chemo who was put in jail was peacefully protesting too, as were the others. But SHE was an opponent of the current Regime,

2) The TN Dems still halted an official proceeding….still Guilty.
1. She was a participant of a violent riot. Not a peaceful protest.

2. The TN legislature was not under any threat of violence. No officers were assaulted. No doors were demolished. No emergency evacuation. There was nothing corrupt about their protest.
 
1) The Grandma undergoing chemo who was put in jail was peacefully protesting too, as were the others. But SHE was an opponent of the current Regime,

2) The TN Dems still halted an official proceeding….still Guilty.

Sec 27. Any member of either House of the general Assembly, shall have liberty to dissent from, and protest against, any act or resolve which he may think injurious to the public or to any individual, and to have the reasons for his dissent entered on the journals.

Section 2 of the Tennessee Constitution.
 
It was a violation of the Law of Tennessee, and the violators weren't dealt with by Majority Vote.

Do you have a problem with democracy or something?

Sec 27. Any member of either House of the general Assembly, shall have liberty to dissent from, and protest against, any act or resolve which he may think injurious to the public or to any individual, and to have the reasons for his dissent entered on the journals.

Tennessee Constitution.
 
1. She was a participant of a violent riot. Not a peaceful protest.
In the former America, you don’t arrest people for what others do. By your notion, hundreds of thousands of BLM protestors should be in jail as well because they were part of a violent riot.
2. The TN legislature was not under any threat of violence. No officers were assaulted. No doors were demolished. No emergency evacuation. There was nothing corrupt about their protest.

None of that matters. You lefties sure like to change the law around, don’t you? The political prisoners of 1/6 are in jail for obstructing an official proceeding. The same thing your leftist “law-makers” were doing. They should be in jail, too….or all 1/6 prisoners immediately released.
 
It was a violation of the Law of Tennessee, and the violators weren't dealt with by Majority Vote.

Do you have a problem with democracy or something?
People of the state of Tennessee were deprived of their chosen representatives.

That’s extremely anti-democratic.
 
In the former America, you don’t arrest people for what others do. By your notion, hundreds of thousands of BLM protestors should be in jail as well because they were part of a violent riot.


None of that matters. You lefties sure like to change the law around, don’t you? The political prisoners of 1/6 are in jail for obstructing an official proceeding. The same thing your leftist “law-makers” were doing. They should be in jail, too….or all 1/6 prisoners immediately released.

Sec 27. Any member of either House of the general Assembly, shall have liberty to dissent from, and protest against, any act or resolve which he may think injurious to the public or to any individual, and to have the reasons for his dissent entered on the journals.

Tennessee Constitution.
 
Once again, hypocrisy is not a strong enough word.

The 1/6 protestors are languishing in jail over the charge that they impeded an official proceeding, which is exactly what the Tennessee protestors did. Yet our incompetent idiot of a VP was down there railing against “censorship” in the latter case - when she rightly should have been with the families of the victims of the trans-monster - while supporting the arrest and imprisonment of the 1/6 protestors who did the same.

1) Why is impeding an official proceeding to be defended when it’s by leftists, yet charged as a crime and punished by jail when it’s by righties?

2) Can anyone think of a stronger word than “hypocrite’?

I know how complicated this will be, but here goes:

The fact that two events may be SIMILAR do not make them the SAME in importance or priority.

Some crimes are worse than others, and are enforced that way. Some wars are worse than others, and are considered that way. Some diseases are worse than others, and are treated that way.

I hope that helps, but I very much doubt it.
 
In the former America, you don’t arrest people for what others do. By your notion, hundreds of thousands of BLM protestors should be in jail as well because they were part of a violent riot.


None of that matters. You lefties sure like to change the law around, don’t you? The political prisoners of 1/6 are in jail for obstructing an official proceeding. The same thing your leftist “law-makers” were doing. They should be in jail, too….or all 1/6 prisoners immediately released.
She was part of a riot which makes her a rioter. She is prosecuted for her actions.

All of it matters. You just want to ignore facts that don’t serve your purposes. January 6th was a violent riot.
 
Sec 27. Any member of either House of the general Assembly, shall have liberty to dissent from, and protest against, any act or resolve which he may think injurious to the public or to any individual, and to have the reasons for his dissent entered on the journals.

Section 2 of the Tennessee Constitution.
Unless you are black the rule applies.
 
People of the state of Tennessee were deprived of their chosen representatives.

That’s extremely anti-democratic.


Those chosen representatives weren't able to behave in a polite manner so they were dismissed by the popular vote of the representatives of the people.
 
People of the state of Tennessee were deprived of their chosen representatives.

That’s extremely anti-democratic.
An attempt is being made in the NY legal system to deprive tens of millions of people of selecting their preferred president. That is extremely anti-Democratic.
 
1. She was a participant of a violent riot. Not a peaceful protest.

2. The TN legislature was not under any threat of violence. No officers were assaulted. No doors were demolished. No emergency evacuation. There was nothing corrupt about their protest.
One day that same propaganda you typed will be used against you or what you support. Not a threat. Reality in declining nations. Especially if the real privileged keeps getting paid off as the rest slowly become impoverished. If Republicans in power do not do the same things as they receive, then we are finished. Your way with the musical chairs type of government will be the law of the land and world. It may start with reduced services and resources for individuals picked as not needed anymore. Then to those who do not obey the dictums of the ruling class. And as it gets to finality pure violence of the oppressive state against the peasants.
 

Forum List

Back
Top