Why is a 1944 law on communicable disease that Trump instituted our only defense of the border?

MarathonMike

Diamond Member
Dec 30, 2014
44,967
60,886
3,645
The Southwestern Desert
How is it the most powerful country in the world is defenseless against the hordes of illegals pouring across the border? Why do we need an obscure law from 1944 to control our border? Why do we let Mexico facilitate the attack? Why do we not call out China for attacking us with Fentanyl?
 
We are not defenseless. There are simply too many people in power who want as many wretched third-world bastards in our midst as possible.

Keep in mind, NONE of the people storming our borders has a legitimate reason to be here. Even if they did have grounds to seek asylum, under international law, they must seek it in the first country they reach after leaving their own border - Mexico, for most of them.

Rather than questioning why we are "defenseless," ask why people who merely suggest that we enforce our existing immigration are treated as lunatics, racists, or worse?
 
It is all part of the plan that began with the enactment of Hart-Celler, the long game.

We have the Democrat Mayor in NYC demanding more money for housing, etc., for illegals as he shows far more concern about the illegals than the citizens. It is what you can expect nationally from the Democrats as well plus their rat RINO pals. Notice he isn't demanding Biden shut the border.
 
How is it the most powerful country in the world is defenseless against the hordes of illegals pouring across the border? Why do we need an obscure law from 1944 to control our border? Why do we let Mexico facilitate the attack? Why do we not call out China for attacking us with Fentanyl?

Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

Damned if that ain't the truth.
 
We are not defenseless. There are simply too many people in power who want as many wretched third-world bastards in our midst as possible.

Keep in mind, NONE of the people storming our borders has a legitimate reason to be here. Even if they did have grounds to seek asylum, under international law, they must seek it in the first country they reach after leaving their own border - Mexico, for most of them.

Rather than questioning why we are "defenseless," ask why people who merely suggest that we enforce our existing immigration are treated as lunatics, racists, or worse?

Even the ones who do get the "asylum" ball rolling, rarely show up at their hearings.
 
Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

Damned if that ain't the truth.
dnc.jpg
 
Here's the main event:



Open borders (unrestricted immigration) is a key component of George Soros’s open society philosophy and the Open Society network of nonprofit foundations.

 
You know what I found, particularly disturbing, which I had never even given a thought to, until I listened to an interview last week on this Ukrainian situation?

Was something called, "horizontal warfare," this is what the US did by blowing up the Russians' Nordstream II pipeline.

You see, we have what is an essentially, AN OPEN BORDER. Anyone that wants to come across, and claim they are a refugee, can just claim they are an alien refugee.

This would make any potentially retaliatory ""horizontal warfare strike," by, say, a contracting organization, which has been sold provisions by the Russians, EXTREMELY easy to accomplish, well, that is, if we don't have a lot of intelligence and special forces assets monitoring for that sort of thing down at the border.



(Some of you may be familiar with Judge Andrew Napolitano formerly Fox News? Bookmarked at topical point in time.)




"I just got done listening to that interview between the Judge and the colonel.

The Judge often does interviews with neo-cons, CIA folks, you know the types. Obviously, he still has a lot of friends and connections from the old Fox News days.

He played some clips of a CIA guy and let the colonel respond. Very inteesting.

One aspect of all of this, which had never even crossed my mind. . . "


Was what he referred to as the Russians not even using horizontal warfare, much like the US did with that bombing of the Nordstream II.

Indeed, he talks about potential Russian responses to our actions, "horizontally," at minute mark 42:00. The insanity of having such a porous border while fighting a proxy war? That is nuts.

Complete clown world."
 
1671511591666.png




Rep. Fallon: We Will Get Answers on ICE Underreporting​


EXCLUSIVE: ‘Unacceptable’: Texas GOP Rep Demands Mayorkas Answer To Data ‘Miscalculations’ After DCNF Reports​

1671511708745.png


1-bcd47048dc.jpg

2-a434c922c5.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top