PostmodernProph
....fully immersed....
I'm not debating an article......state your argument in your own words or admit you are wrong.....at least pick one of your 29+ and defend it.....
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not debating an article......state your argument in your own words or admit you are wrong.....at least pick an example and defend it.....
ENOUGH! I'm not going to play your games.
so......show me a fact.....You don't get to ignore the facts
and then declare someone wrong.
ENOUGH! I'm not going to play your games.
my game is honest debate and you're not going to play.....
so......show me a fact.....You don't get to ignore the facts
and then declare someone wrong.
logic declares you are wrong......your refusal to defend your claims by providing evidence seals it....
are any of your "29+ evidences" anything that amounts to more than circular reasoning?......
ENOUGH! I'm not going to play your games.
my game is honest debate and you're not going to play.....
so......show me a fact.....PostmodernProph said:You don't get to ignore the facts
and then declare someone wrong.
PostmodernProph said:logic declares you are wrong......your refusal to defend your claims by providing evidence seals it....
ENOUGH! I'm not going to play your games.
my game is honest debate and you're not going to play.....
so......show me a fact.....
and then declare someone wrong.
logic declares you are wrong......your refusal to defend your claims by providing evidence seals it....
Can you believe he claims to be a PhD geologist? Me neither...
lol....I've read and debated them on boards like this many times......you?.....can you even articulate a defense for your argument or are you limited to pointing and saying "look over there, those guys could win a debate with you if they were here!".........are any of your "29+ evidences" anything that amounts to more than circular reasoning?......
Indubitably. But you didn't bother to read them, or to point out which are circular reasoning and why, so obviously you don't know it for yourself.
I suggest you review the thread.
lol....I've read and debated them on boards like this many times......you?.....can you even articulate a defense for your argument or are you limited to pointing and saying "look over there, those guys could win a debate with you if they were here!".........are any of your "29+ evidences" anything that amounts to more than circular reasoning?......
Indubitably. But you didn't bother to read them, or to point out which are circular reasoning and why, so obviously you don't know it for yourself.
the problem with debates like that is that after I spend the time disproving one of these "29+ evidences" folks like you simply sit back and say "yeah? So what! There's 28 more where that came from"......meanwhile you add nothing to the conversation......I'm tired of simply proving the guy who wrote the article didn't understand what he was saying......I want live meat......
plate tectonics can be measured with instruments.....everything about the Big Bang that happened following its "bang" can be measured with instruments.....
relativity, string theory, and that which happened BEFORE the Big Bang, like macro-evolution aren't falsifiable.....
Shall I continue?
my game is honest debate and you're not going to play.....
so......show me a fact.....
logic declares you are wrong......your refusal to defend your claims by providing evidence seals it....
Can you believe he claims to be a PhD geologist? Me neither...
Show me where I have ever claimed to have a PhD. I know you aren't even though you claim to be.
lol....I've read and debated them on boards like this many times......you?.....can you even articulate a defense for your argument or are you limited to pointing and saying "look over there, those guys could win a debate with you if they were here!".........Indubitably. But you didn't bother to read them, or to point out which are circular reasoning and why, so obviously you don't know it for yourself.
the problem with debates like that is that after I spend the time disproving one of these "29+ evidences" folks like you simply sit back and say "yeah? So what! There's 28 more where that came from"......meanwhile you add nothing to the conversation......I'm tired of simply proving the guy who wrote the article didn't understand what he was saying......I want live meat......
The problem with people like you is that you refuse to accept any evidence presented to you (which is yet another reason why I mostly no longer bother), being totally anti-evolution, refuse to present any alternative theory (or the evidence to support it) that better explains the evidence you refuse to acknowledge, claim to have logic on their side while clearly not understanding anything about the topic at hand, claim to disprove any evidence presented while not actually providing any evidence of said refutations....
In other words, there is no debate here. There is only you demonstrating your dishonesty. Shall I continue?