Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Why do you oppose cutting co2 emissions?
Why you should support cutting emissions
1. It is a green house that will change our climate in bad ways.
2. It is poisonous at high levels.
Why do you oppose cutting co2 emissions?
Why you should support cutting emissions
1. It is a green house that will change our climate in bad ways.
2. It is poisonous at high levels.
Being conscious of CO2 emissions is fine , having some regulation is fine, crippling Industries because they cant reach some unrealistic emissions number, dreampt up by a Warming Religious Zealot somewhere in Academia is not ok. Some people have issues with the way our government burocratic agencies go about their business.
Were making tractor engines now that cant run right because of the EPA. They need to live in the realm of what is reality and what is possible, unless you wish us to become a service industry nation.
Could you explain the reasoning that you used to come to that conclusion?Why you should support cutting emissions
1. It is a green house that will change our climate in bad ways.
Because I am an avid environmentalist.Why do you oppose cutting co2 emissions?
why do libbies oppose the best way to cut emissions, nuclear power?Why do you oppose cutting co2 emissions?
Why you should support cutting emissions
1. It is a green house that will change our climate in bad ways.
2. It is poisonous at high levels.
It's junk science.Why do you oppose cutting co2 emissions?
Why you should support cutting emissions
1. It is a green house that will change our climate in bad ways.
2. It is poisonous at high levels.
The trees, plants, and blue/green algae scrub the air anyway and take out the carbon and free the oxygen for us anyway.Being conscious of CO2 emissions is fine , having some regulation is fine, crippling Industries because they cant reach some unrealistic emissions number, dreampt up by a Warming Religious Zealot somewhere in Academia is not ok. Some people have issues with the way our government burocratic agencies go about their business.
Were making tractor engines now that cant run right because of the EPA. They need to live in the realm of what is reality and what is possible, unless you wish us to become a service industry nation.
Whose air is it they are polluting? Is it THEIR air? Or is it the air of all the people? It's like going around throwing all your trash all over the place, simply because it's CHEAPER to do that than to produce less trash.
The trees, plants, and blue/green algae scrub the air anyway and take out the carbon and free the oxygen for us anyway.Being conscious of CO2 emissions is fine , having some regulation is fine, crippling Industries because they cant reach some unrealistic emissions number, dreampt up by a Warming Religious Zealot somewhere in Academia is not ok. Some people have issues with the way our government burocratic agencies go about their business.
Were making tractor engines now that cant run right because of the EPA. They need to live in the realm of what is reality and what is possible, unless you wish us to become a service industry nation.
Whose air is it they are polluting? Is it THEIR air? Or is it the air of all the people? It's like going around throwing all your trash all over the place, simply because it's CHEAPER to do that than to produce less trash.
Well China not the USA is doing all the polluting.The trees, plants, and blue/green algae scrub the air anyway and take out the carbon and free the oxygen for us anyway.Being conscious of CO2 emissions is fine , having some regulation is fine, crippling Industries because they cant reach some unrealistic emissions number, dreampt up by a Warming Religious Zealot somewhere in Academia is not ok. Some people have issues with the way our government burocratic agencies go about their business.
Were making tractor engines now that cant run right because of the EPA. They need to live in the realm of what is reality and what is possible, unless you wish us to become a service industry nation.
Whose air is it they are polluting? Is it THEIR air? Or is it the air of all the people? It's like going around throwing all your trash all over the place, simply because it's CHEAPER to do that than to produce less trash.
They do. Did you know the Oceans take in a massive amount of CO2. The problem we have is that A) the massive sudden increase in CO2 is killing our oceans, if they die, they won't take in CO2 and that will cause massive problems and B) potentially the oceans have reached their limits for how much they can take in, and we're pumping out more and more CO2 every year.
What we also know is that if the shit hits the fan there is absolutely NOTHING we'll be able to do about it. So, we could either make sure it doesn't reach that stage, or we could just pray that we're don't get completely fucked and the cockroaches take over.....
Well China not the USA is doing all the polluting.The trees, plants, and blue/green algae scrub the air anyway and take out the carbon and free the oxygen for us anyway.Being conscious of CO2 emissions is fine , having some regulation is fine, crippling Industries because they cant reach some unrealistic emissions number, dreampt up by a Warming Religious Zealot somewhere in Academia is not ok. Some people have issues with the way our government burocratic agencies go about their business.
Were making tractor engines now that cant run right because of the EPA. They need to live in the realm of what is reality and what is possible, unless you wish us to become a service industry nation.
Whose air is it they are polluting? Is it THEIR air? Or is it the air of all the people? It's like going around throwing all your trash all over the place, simply because it's CHEAPER to do that than to produce less trash.
They do. Did you know the Oceans take in a massive amount of CO2. The problem we have is that A) the massive sudden increase in CO2 is killing our oceans, if they die, they won't take in CO2 and that will cause massive problems and B) potentially the oceans have reached their limits for how much they can take in, and we're pumping out more and more CO2 every year.
What we also know is that if the shit hits the fan there is absolutely NOTHING we'll be able to do about it. So, we could either make sure it doesn't reach that stage, or we could just pray that we're don't get completely fucked and the cockroaches take over.....
We have emissions controls in the USA at least.
China does not.
CO2 is a GHG, but increasing it from 280 ppm to over 400 ppm will not cause a warming? My, Mr. Westwall, that is some powerful shit you are smoking.Why do you oppose cutting co2 emissions?
Why you should support cutting emissions
1. It is a green house that will change our climate in bad ways.
2. It is poisonous at high levels.
Reasons why your claims are ridiculous.
1. It is a GHG that has to date no evidence to support the idea that it causes global warming. It IS however, THE fundamental building block of all life on this planet. CO2 feeds plants. Without plants we all die. It's as simple as that.
2. So is water. In other words the only way you can be poisoned from it is if you intentionally try to do it.
Fucking bullshit. Junk science is ignoring what the past tells us about rapid changes in the GHGs in the atmosphere. Junk science is ignoring the very rapid rise in temperature, acidity in the oceans,. sea level rise, and the rapid shrinking of the cryosphere. Junk science is ignoring what the absorption spectra of CO2 and CH4 tells us.It's junk science.Why do you oppose cutting co2 emissions?
Why you should support cutting emissions
1. It is a green house that will change our climate in bad ways.
2. It is poisonous at high levels.
Because we have much less expensive and less dangerous methods of generating power. Wind and solar are both way cheaper than nuclear, and with the grid scale batteries being currently being produced, are 24/7. Why are you so determined to make all of us pay far more for our power?why do libbies oppose the best way to cut emissions, nuclear power?Why do you oppose cutting co2 emissions?
Why you should support cutting emissions
1. It is a green house that will change our climate in bad ways.
2. It is poisonous at high levels.
LOL You and the orange clown. LOLBecause I am an avid environmentalist.Why do you oppose cutting co2 emissions?
