kwc57
BOHICA Obama
So, let's sum up. Government subsidies for oil=good and necessary, government subsidies for sustainable energy=bad.
Seems the sustainable energy people need two things: more lobbyists to buy more congressmen and a think tank full of 'pundits' who can craft a message and buy the influence of Rush Limbaugh. After that, each and every Conservative will genuflect at the altar of sustainable energy. 'Cause Rush said so.
That has to be the way. Otherwise, all those Conservatives would realize that:
1) fossil fuels are a finite resource
2) fossil fuels create more pollution than we can safely absorb
3) fossil fuels are dirty to produce (obtain, refine and transport)
4) fossil fuels seem to be concentrated in areas with unstable political regimes
5) sustainable energy, like fossil fuels, will take time to develop and implement, yet the pay back is huge in terms of environmental safety, political risk and long term reliability
6) big energy has the resources to spin their message so with out much intellect it's easy to dismiss sustainable energy.
Short answer, let us know when you develop an alternate energy source that can power the industrialized world like oil, gas and coal can. Big energy is big for a reason, it works. Personally, I want to see those solar powered 18 wheelers pulling cargo over the continental divide at 70 MPH and the wind powered airliner carrying hundreds of passengers across the ocean.
Ummm.... ever hear of Hydrogen? Plentiful, clean, efficient as hell.... difficult to manufacture though... However, If BIG OIL, or some other current entity would pour their $$$ into R&D on how to more efficiently produce it, that company(s) would still have something to sell and profit off of.
If we find a reasonably cost effective method for extracting hydrogen, Fuel Cells could power 18 wheelers, airplanes, cars, get homes off of the electrical grid, etc.
Yes, IF.