Why do people from the political forum that demand honesty and morality

[Taz]

I only asked you "how many of you are there" after you posted this gem, Mr WeeWee.

"Because it is hardwired into us. We didn’t put it there and we can’t get rid of it. We feel so strongly about it that when we violate it rather than abandoning the concept we rationalize we didn’t violate it."

You then went off into loony town about how " God created the material universe so that he can experience the material world through us." As if God was all by his lonesome in hebbin and needed ya'll to play with otherwise he wouldn't know what its like to be insane? lol..sure..And this little piggy goes we we we.

So just tell me.

HOW MANY OF YOU ARE THERE?

Dude, everyone sees through your charade.

What charade? Sounds like you are projecting. Those are your words, us us us, we we we. Consistently.

"God experiences the material world through us." That gem came out of your head. Have you forgotten?

What God is that? The Lord of Darkness? Who is us? The damned?

How many of you are there?

The charade you are playing. I see right through it. You don’t want people to know God.

There is only one Creator and he absolutely does experience the material world through us. He literally shares in our experiences.

Then why can’t you prove it?

I do. Everyday.

Do what? Whack off?

 

[Natural Citizen]

migrate over here and make fun of those that preach it.

Their root certificate expired May of 2018. What kind of amateurs run that joint?

If their domain expires tell em we're gonna steal that thing out from under em, secure it, and then turn it into an online cook book. lol.

 

[ding]

Dude, everyone sees through your charade.

What charade? Sounds like you are projecting. Those are your words, us us us, we we we. Consistently.

"God experiences the material world through us." That gem came out of your head. Have you forgotten?

What God is that? The Lord of Darkness? Who is us? The damned?

How many of you are there?

The charade you are playing. I see right through it. You don’t want people to know God.

There is only one Creator and he absolutely does experience the material world through us. He literally shares in our experiences.

Then why can’t you prove it?

I do. Everyday.

Do what? Whack off?

No. That spirit created the material world.

 

[Taz]

What charade? Sounds like you are projecting. Those are your words, us us us, we we we. Consistently.

"God experiences the material world through us." That gem came out of your head. Have you forgotten?

What God is that? The Lord of Darkness? Who is us? The damned?

How many of you are there?

The charade you are playing. I see right through it. You don’t want people to know God.

There is only one Creator and he absolutely does experience the material world through us. He literally shares in our experiences.

Then why can’t you prove it?

I do. Everyday.

Do what? Whack off?

No. That spirit created the material world.

That's a guess. No proof.

 

[ding]

The charade you are playing. I see right through it. You don’t want people to know God.

There is only one Creator and he absolutely does experience the material world through us. He literally shares in our experiences.

Then why can’t you prove it?

I do. Everyday.

Do what? Whack off?

No. That spirit created the material world.

That's a guess. No proof.

No, it’s a conclusion based on available evidence and logic.

 

[danielpalos]

migrate over here and make fun of those that preach it.

i just argue the point. it takes morals to have moral forms of indignation. simple bigotry while having an inferior argument, is not it.

 

[Taz]

Then why can’t you prove it?

I do. Everyday.

Do what? Whack off?

No. That spirit created the material world.

That's a guess. No proof.

No, it’s a conclusion based on available evidence and logic.

Logic is meaningless here, so what evidence do you have?

 

[Unkotare]

I do. Everyday.

Do what? Whack off?

No. That spirit created the material world.

That's a guess. No proof.

No, it’s a conclusion based on available evidence and logic.

Logic is meaningless here, so what evidence do you have?

You wouldn’t know logic if it broke both your arms and threw you across the room, idiot.

 

[Taz]

Do what? Whack off?

No. That spirit created the material world.

That's a guess. No proof.

No, it’s a conclusion based on available evidence and logic.

Logic is meaningless here, so what evidence do you have?

You wouldn’t know logic if it broke both your arms and threw you across the room, idiot.

Logic can’t do that. Now you know, fool.

 

[ding]

I do. Everyday.

Do what? Whack off?

No. That spirit created the material world.

That's a guess. No proof.

No, it’s a conclusion based on available evidence and logic.

Logic is meaningless here, so what evidence do you have?

Logic and philosophy is all there is for something outside of space and time.

 

[Taz]

Do what? Whack off?

No. That spirit created the material world.

That's a guess. No proof.

No, it’s a conclusion based on available evidence and logic.

Logic is meaningless here, so what evidence do you have?

Logic and philosophy is all there is for something outside of space and time.

In other words, you have no real proof. Just your own opinion.

 

[ding]

No. That spirit created the material world.

That's a guess. No proof.

No, it’s a conclusion based on available evidence and logic.

Logic is meaningless here, so what evidence do you have?

Logic and philosophy is all there is for something outside of space and time.

In other words, you have no real proof. Just your own opinion.

Of course I do. I have the available data within space and time.

 

[Taz]

That's a guess. No proof.

No, it’s a conclusion based on available evidence and logic.

Logic is meaningless here, so what evidence do you have?

Logic and philosophy is all there is for something outside of space and time.

In other words, you have no real proof. Just your own opinion.

Of course I do. I have the available data within space and time.

You just said that logic and philosophy is all there is for that question. Don’t you pay attention to what you write?

 

[ding]

No, it’s a conclusion based on available evidence and logic.

Logic is meaningless here, so what evidence do you have?

Logic and philosophy is all there is for something outside of space and time.

In other words, you have no real proof. Just your own opinion.

Of course I do. I have the available data within space and time.

You just said that logic and philosophy is all there is for that question. Don’t you pay attention to what you write?

Apparently you don’t.

The available evidence within space and time are the basis for the logic and philosophy.

Specifically the laws of nature.

 

[Unkotare]

No. That spirit created the material world.

That's a guess. No proof.

No, it’s a conclusion based on available evidence and logic.

Logic is meaningless here, so what evidence do you have?

You wouldn’t know logic if it broke both your arms and threw you across the room, idiot.

Logic can’t do that. ....

You wouldn’t know.

 

[Taz]

Logic is meaningless here, so what evidence do you have?

Logic and philosophy is all there is for something outside of space and time.

In other words, you have no real proof. Just your own opinion.

Of course I do. I have the available data within space and time.

You just said that logic and philosophy is all there is for that question. Don’t you pay attention to what you write?

Apparently you don’t.

The available evidence within space and time are the basis for the logic and philosophy.

Specifically the laws of nature.

Who wrote the laws of nature?

 

[ding]

Logic and philosophy is all there is for something outside of space and time.

In other words, you have no real proof. Just your own opinion.

Of course I do. I have the available data within space and time.

You just said that logic and philosophy is all there is for that question. Don’t you pay attention to what you write?

Apparently you don’t.

The available evidence within space and time are the basis for the logic and philosophy.

Specifically the laws of nature.

Who wrote the laws of nature?

Which laws of nature? Can you even name any?

 

[Taz]

In other words, you have no real proof. Just your own opinion.

Of course I do. I have the available data within space and time.

You just said that logic and philosophy is all there is for that question. Don’t you pay attention to what you write?

Apparently you don’t.

The available evidence within space and time are the basis for the logic and philosophy.

Specifically the laws of nature.

Who wrote the laws of nature?

Which laws of nature? Can you even name any?

The one that says you can’t prove anything outside of time and space.

 

[Unkotare]

No, it’s a conclusion based on available evidence and logic.

Logic is meaningless here, so what evidence do you have?

You wouldn’t know logic if it broke both your arms and threw you across the room, idiot.

Logic can’t do that. ....

You wouldn’t know.

Go blow yourself, man bun wrestling homo.

No means no, freak.

 

[Unkotare]

Of course I do. I have the available data within space and time.

You just said that logic and philosophy is all there is for that question. Don’t you pay attention to what you write?

Apparently you don’t.

The available evidence within space and time are the basis for the logic and philosophy.

Specifically the laws of nature.

Who wrote the laws of nature?

Which laws of nature? Can you even name any?

The one that says you can’t prove anything outside of time and space.

You really need to find another topic. You’re lost.