OohPooPahDoo
Gold Member
Why didn't the school shooter use a fully automatic rifle? Seems like he could have done more damage that way.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why didn't the school shooter use a fully automatic rifle? Seems like he could have done more damage that way.
Because it's not what his mom had in the house.
Because it's not what his mom had in the house.
? Why would that matter? He's not a law abiding citizen. Thus the LAW cannot stop him from getting any kind of weapon he desires. He's surely not going to be restricted by what his mommie has laying around if, like all non-law abiding citizens, he can get any weapon he wants.
Seems like he could have done more damage that way.
Why didn't the school shooter use a fully automatic rifle? Seems like he could have done more damage that way.
Maybe he didn't realize how easy it is to remove the sear from that Bushmaster, which would make it a fully automatic firearm?
Seems like he could have done more damage that way.
Not really. A fully automatic firearm does not necessarily do more damage. It generally means a lot more misses.
Maybe he didn't realize how easy it is to remove the sear from that Bushmaster, which would make it a fully automatic firearm?Why didn't the school shooter use a fully automatic rifle? Seems like he could have done more damage that way.
Because it's not what his mom had in the house.
? Why would that matter? He's not a law abiding citizen. Thus the LAW cannot stop him from getting any kind of weapon he desires. He's surely not going to be restricted by what his mommie has laying around if, like all non-law abiding citizens, he can get any weapon he wants.
The disabling device can be removed by anyone interested in doing so, by doing no more than obtaining a file and doing a Google search.Why didn't the school shooter use a fully automatic rifle? Seems like he could have done more damage that way.
Maybe he didn't realize how easy it is to remove the sear from that Bushmaster, which would make it a fully automatic firearm?
You mean disabling device required by law on the gun actually thwarted him? Unbelievable! A law like that will only stop LAW ABIDING citizens - not criminals like this guy! I reject you theory based solely on that notion.
Because it's not what his mom had in the house.
? Why would that matter? He's not a law abiding citizen. Thus the LAW cannot stop him from getting any kind of weapon he desires. He's surely not going to be restricted by what his mommie has laying around if, like all non-law abiding citizens, he can get any weapon he wants.
Because it's not what his mom had in the house.
? Why would that matter? He's not a law abiding citizen. Thus the LAW cannot stop him from getting any kind of weapon he desires. He's surely not going to be restricted by what his mommie has laying around if, like all non-law abiding citizens, he can get any weapon he wants.
look he stole the weapons you dumb shit.
Felony no. 1
It was all downhill from there
It is for knee-jerk pifflewits like poopy-poo.Geez....Was that so hard to figure out?
Seems like he could have done more damage that way.
Not really. A fully automatic firearm does not necessarily do more damage. It generally means a lot more misses.
That must be why the military uses them. Because they aren't any more useful at killing people than semi-automatics.
Because it's not what his mom had in the house.
? Why would that matter? He's not a law abiding citizen. Thus the LAW cannot stop him from getting any kind of weapon he desires. He's surely not going to be restricted by what his mommie has laying around if, like all non-law abiding citizens, he can get any weapon he wants.
Not restricted, but it's what he chose. Sorry if the crazy motherfucker's choice doesn't fit into your agenda, but it is what it is.
He stole the weapons, you fucking hysterical moonbat.? Why would that matter? He's not a law abiding citizen. Thus the LAW cannot stop him from getting any kind of weapon he desires. He's surely not going to be restricted by what his mommie has laying around if, like all non-law abiding citizens, he can get any weapon he wants.
look he stole the weapons you dumb shit.
Felony no. 1
It was all downhill from there
As a non-law abiding citizen he would have had access to any gun he wanted. Didn't you hear? Gun control laws do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to stop criminals.
? Why would that matter? He's not a law abiding citizen. Thus the LAW cannot stop him from getting any kind of weapon he desires. He's surely not going to be restricted by what his mommie has laying around if, like all non-law abiding citizens, he can get any weapon he wants.
look he stole the weapons you dumb shit.
Felony no. 1
It was all downhill from there
As a non-law abiding citizen he would have had access to any gun he wanted. Didn't you hear? Gun control laws do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to stop criminals.