emilynghiem
Constitutionalist / Universalist
REVISED clarification: the poll refers to who is really owed a debt or else they are lost to political exploitation for the sake of winning elections. If you have comments on who "handed Obama the election" please specify that also, but that is not what the poll meant. Sorry this wasn't clear. [For "Other" you can also specify MILITARY, since not only Obama but all of us owe our Troops, Police, and community volunteers thanks for enforcing our security and rights to freely exercise our democratic election process. The Military may not have won him the election, but the debt and thanks owed to them is what the poll is really asking. Thank you!]
===========================================================================
Latino Groups are reported to be lobbying Obama, claiming he "owes them the election."
He already signed the Dream Act and another Amnesty ageement (similar to how previous Republican Presidents Reagan and Bush both signed for Amnesty).
Ann Coulter pointed out that immigrants who are not yet citizens aren't "owed" anything, especially next to Black who were wronged and are owed corrections for denying civil rights.
To whom do you feel Obama owes the most?
Do you think it is ethical to pressure the President to back certain agenda in exchange for voter support? Does this help with equal inclusion and protection, or risk putting party or private interests above Constitutional duty to all Americans first?
===========================================================================
Latino Groups are reported to be lobbying Obama, claiming he "owes them the election."
He already signed the Dream Act and another Amnesty ageement (similar to how previous Republican Presidents Reagan and Bush both signed for Amnesty).
Ann Coulter pointed out that immigrants who are not yet citizens aren't "owed" anything, especially next to Black who were wronged and are owed corrections for denying civil rights.
To whom do you feel Obama owes the most?
Do you think it is ethical to pressure the President to back certain agenda in exchange for voter support? Does this help with equal inclusion and protection, or risk putting party or private interests above Constitutional duty to all Americans first?
Last edited: