RoccoR
Gold Member
Hossfly, et al,
Well, it is not a "For or Against" question. So no, it is not that easy.
I am FOR regional peace and stability.
While I recognize the right FOR Israel to exist, I find also find that it is outside the boundaries of the Israel that was originally admitted to the UN in 1949. I also see it as expansionist beyond the 1967 borders.
I think that Israel has broken International Law in the way it has administered the occupied territories, and I believe that the US is guilty of aiding and abetting Israel in the improper administration of the Occupied Territories.
So while I believe that Israel should exist, I also believe that Israel is subject to International Law, and not above the law.
Most Respectfully,
R
Well, it is not a "For or Against" question. So no, it is not that easy.
(COMMENT)Are you FOR or AGAINST Israel? That's an easy question for you.et al,
I am not, an unconditional Israeli supporter of the Jewish Homeland.
I am FOR regional peace and stability.
While I recognize the right FOR Israel to exist, I find also find that it is outside the boundaries of the Israel that was originally admitted to the UN in 1949. I also see it as expansionist beyond the 1967 borders.
I think that Israel has broken International Law in the way it has administered the occupied territories, and I believe that the US is guilty of aiding and abetting Israel in the improper administration of the Occupied Territories.
Violation: Part 2, Article 8, para 2b(viii), of the Rome Statute, and Section III, Article 47 of the Geneva Convention (IV).
So while I believe that Israel should exist, I also believe that Israel is subject to International Law, and not above the law.
Most Respectfully,
R
Last edited: