Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets because the nature of our military's changed. We have these things called aircraft carriers where planes land on them. We have these ships that go underwater, nuclear submarines, he said. And so the question is not a game of Battleship where we're counting ships. It's it's what are our capabilities.
True, bayonets are still issued but only as a last resort. Issued more for tradition and photo-ops but not for modern warfare. Nice try Romney but fuck you and your 'knife'!
With 'horses and bayonets,' Obama casts Romney as out of touch - latimes.com
Governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets because the nature of our military's changed. We have these things called aircraft carriers where planes land on them. We have these ships that go underwater, nuclear submarines, he said. And so the question is not a game of Battleship where we're counting ships. It's it's what are our capabilities.
Your dear leader Moabama brought up the subject of bayonets, not Romney, how ignorant are you? The kid got rocks alright, in his head.
Obama is nitpicking in hopes of slowing the momentum of the Romney campaign. It's not working.
Obama cannot run on his record and his only hope is to make Romney look bad. Obama himself lamented the used of these exact tactics in the past- before he needed to use them.
At the end of the day Romney is just a one term governor with NO foreign policy experience, who left Massachusetts with a 34% approval rating.
Your dear leader Moabama brought up the subject of bayonets, not Romney, how ignorant are you? The kid got rocks alright, in his head.
The op is a moron......he thinks we can win wars playing Call of Duty......
but it would have been nice to have a few extra ships...say in Libya....how did all that new tech save an ambassador....ooops it didnt
Correcting Obama's Comments on the U.S. Navy and our Mlitary
This evening in the Third Presidential Debate Mitt Romney raised legitimate concerns about the current and shrinking size of the United States Navy. The President responded snarkily by saying that size does not matter because we have these these "things" called Carriers that "planes can land on" and these "things" that go underwater.
This pathetic attempt at rebuttal by Obama is quite simple. The first submarine commissioned by the United States Navy was "USS Holland (SS-1)" on October 12, 1900.
The first Aircraft Carrier commissioned by the United States Navy was the USS Langley
(CV-1) on March 20, 1922.
Exactly how does the existence of Aircraft Carriers and submarines in a Modern American Navy nullify Mitt Romney's just concerns about the size of the Navy? Obama spoke about both as if they were some new fangled advances in naval warfare. The existence of carriers in our fleet justifies its reduction even though they have been an integral part of our navy for 112 and 87 years respectively? I guess in Obama's world Jimmy Doolittle was bombing Tokyo with jet powered B-25 Mitchell bombers, or LeMay with B-29's. How can he defend shrinking a navy whose history he is wholly ignorant?
And yes, the Marine Corps still issues bayonets and lowly K-Bar knives. You know those archaic tools of battle. Even our Special Forces have stooped to using horses in the Afghan Kush but hey, no matter how advanced we become with those new fangled tools like aircraft carriers, submarines and drone UAV's, you still need boots on the ground and they need the equipment to sustain and protect them and you must be prepared to adapt and overcome.
Your dear leader Moabama brought up the subject of bayonets, not Romney, how ignorant are you? The kid got rocks alright, in his head.
The op is a moron......he thinks we can win wars playing Call of Duty......
but it would have been nice to have a few extra ships...say in Libya....how did all that new tech save an ambassador....ooops it didnt
so good I gotta post it.....again
Obama is nitpicking in hopes of slowing the momentum of the Romney campaign. It's not working.
Obama cannot run on his record and his only hope is to make Romney look bad. Obama himself lamented the used of these exact tactics in the past- before he needed to use them.
Obama can run on his record and continues to contrast it to the Republicans obstructionisms policy. Obama has not only slowed Romneys momentum but overtaken it. Romney is dead in the water as we speak... just you watch the polls in the coming days.
Obama is nitpicking in hopes of slowing the momentum of the Romney campaign. It's not working.
Obama cannot run on his record and his only hope is to make Romney look bad. Obama himself lamented the used of these exact tactics in the past- before he needed to use them.
Obama can run on his record and continues to contrast it to the Republicans obstructionisms policy. Obama has not only slowed Romneys momentum but overtaken it. Romney is dead in the water as we speak... just you watch the polls in the coming days.
"obstructionisms" may I ask what dictionary you found that word in.
Obama won the election tonight.
Romney looked foolish and out of his league.
Romney knows nothing about foreign policy except his trip to France to avoid Vietnam.
Obama won the election tonight.
Romney looked foolish and out of his league.
Romney knows nothing about foreign policy except his trip to France to avoid Vietnam.
The fact that no Romney male has ever donned the outfit of the US military and fought to protect this nation was made quite clear tonight.
The Romney's have more vested interest in Mexico..then this country.
And they ran away from a fight there too.
Obama won the election tonight.
Romney looked foolish and out of his league.
Romney knows nothing about foreign policy except his trip to France to avoid Vietnam.
The fact that no Romney male has ever donned the outfit of the US military and fought to protect this nation was made quite clear tonight.
The Romney's have more vested interest in Mexico..then this country.
And they ran away from a fight there too.
Romney is not qualified to be president.
These Republican legacies like Bush and Romney are just spoiled rich kids with no character.
True, bayonets are still issued but only as a last resort. Issued more for tradition and photo-ops but not for modern warfare. Nice try Romney but fuck you and your 'knife'!
With 'horses and bayonets,' Obama casts Romney as out of touch - latimes.com
Governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets because the nature of our military's changed. We have these things called aircraft carriers where planes land on them. We have these ships that go underwater, nuclear submarines, he said. And so the question is not a game of Battleship where we're counting ships. It's it's what are our capabilities.
Romney wants to send American kids to a gunfight with bayonets. He has no intention of ever actually sending himself or his own kids into a fight.
That would be something...Seeing Romney leading a battle. Ha...Ha.. Ya sure Mittens.. Hey Romney...You are no Eisenhower.. seriously.
The fact that no Romney male has ever donned the outfit of the US military and fought to protect this nation was made quite clear tonight.
The Romney's have more vested interest in Mexico..then this country.
And they ran away from a fight there too.
Romney is not qualified to be president.
These Republican legacies like Bush and Romney are just spoiled rich kids with no character.
At least Bush did wear the uniform. And Bush's father is a bonafide hero.
