Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So far, she's full of shit. Black people in 1999 and today can walk down the streets in NYC without getting gunned down by police. More blacks get gunned down by fellow blacks than police.
Because the Ferguson riots made black people look bad, should the news media NOT reported on it?
So far, she's full of shit. Black people in 1999 and today can walk down the streets in NYC without getting gunned down by police. More blacks get gunned down by fellow blacks than police.
Because the Ferguson riots made black people look bad, should the news media NOT reported on it?
Not just more, a lot more Blacks are gunned down by Black hoodlums, than by Police.
Excellent presentation on the subtle white rage that perpetuates systematic racism and bigotry in the United States to this day...
Any and all feedback, on what the speaker presented in her presentation, is welcomed.
I have the libtard on ignore, but my question is, where was the outrage when the police were getting shot by a BLM assassin, while the blacks of BLM ran in the other direction?So far, she's full of shit. Black people in 1999 and today can walk down the streets in NYC without getting gunned down by police. More blacks get gunned down by fellow blacks than police.
Because the Ferguson riots made black people look bad, should the news media NOT reported on it?
Okay now show where you got your statistics.I don't understand the reasoning behind saying that more blacks are killed by blacks than by police. First of all, does that not include black officers when talking about police? Second, the size of those 2 groups is not comparable. I've seen the total police estimated at 750,000-850,000, while there are around 38 million blacks in the country. Third, and most importantly, whether more members of another group kill blacks than police officers or not in no way changes whether blacks being killed by police is too common an occurrence. The acceptability of the number of times police kill members of a certain group should not be based on how many times another type of person kills members of that group.
I'm not trying to argue that blacks are killed disproportionately or not. I'm pointing out that using blacks being killed by other blacks as a counter is a poor argument.
I have the libtard on ignore, but my question is, where was the outrage when the police were getting shot by a BLM assassin, while the blacks of BLM ran in the other direction?So far, she's full of shit. Black people in 1999 and today can walk down the streets in NYC without getting gunned down by police. More blacks get gunned down by fellow blacks than police.
Because the Ferguson riots made black people look bad, should the news media NOT reported on it?
I listened to a good part of the lady's presentation. There was nothing that even came close to "White Rage". Try to be a little more accurate with your thread titles. She also zeroed in on Alabama, big surprise. When you are trying to keep the flames of Racism burning you have to dig up the last few embers and blow real hard. Al Sharpton for example has made a multi million dollar career out of it.
Okay now show where you got your statistics.I don't understand the reasoning behind saying that more blacks are killed by blacks than by police. First of all, does that not include black officers when talking about police? Second, the size of those 2 groups is not comparable. I've seen the total police estimated at 750,000-850,000, while there are around 38 million blacks in the country. Third, and most importantly, whether more members of another group kill blacks than police officers or not in no way changes whether blacks being killed by police is too common an occurrence. The acceptability of the number of times police kill members of a certain group should not be based on how many times another type of person kills members of that group.
I'm not trying to argue that blacks are killed disproportionately or not. I'm pointing out that using blacks being killed by other blacks as a counter is a poor argument.
https://nypost.com/2017/09/26/all-that-kneeling-ignores-the-real-cause-of-soaring-black-homicides/
Oh , there is always this saying that I remember.
"If you go looking for trouble, then trouble will be found". Many black "folks" go out of their way to be confrontational to police. My black friends in my neighborhood are law abiding citizens and never get police harassment. We sit on our front porch drinking Remi Martin, and shake our heads at those people who are victims of liberalism..They are that stupid.
Actually she's right. I have fought battles in a couple of city halls opposing racism on city councils.So far, she's full of shit. Black people in 1999 and today can walk down the streets in NYC without getting gunned down by police. More blacks get gunned down by fellow blacks than police.
Because the Ferguson riots made black people look bad, should the news media NOT reported on it?
I have the libtard on ignore, but my question is, where was the outrage when the police were getting shot by a BLM assassin, while the blacks of BLM ran in the other direction?So far, she's full of shit. Black people in 1999 and today can walk down the streets in NYC without getting gunned down by police. More blacks get gunned down by fellow blacks than police.
Because the Ferguson riots made black people look bad, should the news media NOT reported on it?
Excellent presentation on the subtle white rage that perpetuates systematic racism and bigotry in the United States to this day...
Any and all feedback, on what the speaker presented in her presentation, is welcomed.
She looks like an angry black woman and the vid is an hour long.
Is there a reason why you think we should watch that?