Which Questions Would You Ask Mueller?

[sparky]

Which Questions Would You Ask Mueller?

You drew the short straw, didn't you?

~S~

 

[georgephillip]

Which Questions Would You Ask Mueller:

1. Why were you working with DOJ employee Ohr and the Trump-hating foreign spy, who was working for the FBI, on the Dossier Ohr warned everyone was NOT reliable BEFORE the investigation had officially opened and BEFORE you were ever appointed Special Counsel?

2. Ohr warned everyone else Steele was ultra biased and the Dossier was bogus - did he ever tell YOU the same thing while you were working with him and Steele on the Dossier?
--- How about when you interviewed him as part of the official investigation?

3. Why did you NOT recuse yourself due to the existing Conflict of Interest from the fact that you had worked with Ohr and Steele on the Dossier before being appointed Special Counsel?

4. Why didn't you recuse yourself because of the existing Conflicts of Interest that you were the former FBI Director and that you were also Comey's Mentor having to look into 'Obstruction' charges against your protege, or the fact that as former FBI Director you yourself had been called before a secret FISA Court to explain 75 FUSA Court violations by your FBI?

5. Tasked with investigating Russian interference, why did you NOT go back to the start of that interference, to 2014 when Barak Obama 1st learned of it and allowed it to continue for 2 years?

That's a good STARTING 1st 5...

1. Why were you working with DOJ employee Ohr and the Trump-hating foreign spy, who was working for the FBI, on the Dossier Ohr warned everyone was NOT reliable BEFORE the investigation had officially opened and BEFORE you were ever appointed Special Counsel?

Is this who you're ranting about?

Bruce Ohr - Wikipedia

"Bruce Genesoke Ohr is a United States Department of Justice official.

"A former associate deputy attorney general and former director of the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF),[1] as of February 2018 Ohr was working in the Justice Department's Criminal Division.[2]

"He is an expert on transnational organized crime and has spent most of his career overseeing gang and racketeering-related prosecutions,[3] including Russian organized crime."

Why do you suppose the "Red Don" has a pathological aversion to those who prosecute Russian organized crime figures?

Trump’s ties to the Russian mafia go back 3 decades

 

[georgephillip]

Which Questions Would You Ask Mueller:

1. Why were you working with DOJ employee Ohr and the Trump-hating foreign spy, who was working for the FBI, on the Dossier Ohr warned everyone was NOT reliable BEFORE the investigation had officially opened and BEFORE you were ever appointed Special Counsel?

2. Ohr warned everyone else Steele was ultra biased and the Dossier was bogus - did he ever tell YOU the same thing while you were working with him and Steele on the Dossier?
--- How about when you interviewed him as part of the official investigation?

3. Why did you NOT recuse yourself due to the existing Conflict of Interest from the fact that you had worked with Ohr and Steele on the Dossier before being appointed Special Counsel?

4. Why didn't you recuse yourself because of the existing Conflicts of Interest that you were the former FBI Director and that you were also Comey's Mentor having to look into 'Obstruction' charges against your protege, or the fact that as former FBI Director you yourself had been called before a secret FISA Court to explain 75 FUSA Court violations by your FBI?

5. Tasked with investigating Russian interference, why did you NOT go back to the start of that interference, to 2014 when Barak Obama 1st learned of it and allowed it to continue for 2 years?

That's a good STARTING 1st 5...

2. Ohr warned everyone else Steele was ultra biased and the Dossier was bogus - did he ever tell YOU the same thing while you were working with him and Steele on the Dossier?
--- How about when you interviewed him as part of the official investigation?

Bruce Ohr - Wikipedia

"Russia probe

"Main article: Nunes memo

"Ohr served as the Justice Department contact for Christopher Steele, the former MI6 agent commissioned to author the Trump–Russia dossier; the men first met in 2007.[10]

"The dossier was prepared, under a contract to the DNC and the Clinton campaign, by the opposition research firm Fusion GPS.

"According to a Republican-led investigation, during the 2016 election, Fusion GPS hired Bruce's wife, Nellie Ohr, an independent contractor and Russia specialist, to conduct "research and analysis" of Donald Trump.[11][13][14]

"A comprehensive report done by ABC News disputes that Ohr's wife worked on the dossier, instead stating that she 'was not directly involved in the 'dossier' while she worked for Fusion GPS.'"

Who would you believe, a pathological liar or Bruce and Nellie?

 

[Third Party]

Assuming the grifters and grafters currently running the Executive Branch decide to permit Robert Mueller to testify before Congress, which questions should Democrats or Republican members pose, and which questions would you ask if given the chance?

For example, I've wondered who decided to end Mueller's investigation and why?

What Congress Should Ask Robert Mueller When He Testifies

"11. Many commentators, including highly experienced former federal prosecutors, were surprised by the timing of your end of the investigation while relevant litigation was ongoing and significant actors such as Julian Assange and Roger Stone could still, at least conceivably, flip and cooperate with your investigation, thus potentially yielding new investigations and even prosecutions.

"Please explain fully your reasoning for bringing the investigation to a close when you did."

Assuming there are NO grifters and grafters running the Executive Branch, why did it take so long to come up with nothing?

Are you talking about those dozen or so situations in the Mueller report that would be felony charges for anybody else?

Yes, why did it take so long? Well, maybe Barr will answer that for us.

 

[DJT for Life]

Did your parents have any children that lived?

 

[MAGAman]

Assuming the grifters and grafters currently running the Executive Branch decide to permit Robert Mueller to testify before Congress, which questions should Democrats or Republican members pose, and which questions would you ask if given the chance?

For example, I've wondered who decided to end Mueller's investigation and why?

What Congress Should Ask Robert Mueller When He Testifies

"11. Many commentators, including highly experienced former federal prosecutors, were surprised by the timing of your end of the investigation while relevant litigation was ongoing and significant actors such as Julian Assange and Roger Stone could still, at least conceivably, flip and cooperate with your investigation, thus potentially yielding new investigations and even prosecutions.

"Please explain fully your reasoning for bringing the investigation to a close when you did."

I would ask what those 14 secret cases were that were spawned by the Mueller report

I would ask what those 14 secret cases were that were spawned by the Mueller report

Obviously, Trump would rather not deal with oversight of any kind.

"Even though Trump avoided a knockout blow from the April 18 Mueller report, the special counsel disclosed more than a dozen active criminal inquiries that will play out for months to come, some possibly into the 2020 election campaign season.

"Details on most of these cases are unclear as they were redacted in the 448-page report.

"Only two were not blacked out: one case versus former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen; and one versus Greg Craig, a former White House counsel in the Obama administration."

Explainer: Probes spawned by Mueller target Trump business, others - Reuters

And yet Trump hid nothing from Mueller's witchhunt, and was still exonerated.

 

[Oddball]

I'd ask him if he really thought presenting a report that found no wrongdoing by the prez was going to be the end of it?....Did he really think that the moonbatocrats were going to just let this shit go and *ahem* move on?

 

[georgephillip]

Assuming the grifters and grafters currently running the Executive Branch decide to permit Robert Mueller to testify before Congress, which questions should Democrats or Republican members pose, and which questions would you ask if given the chance?

For example, I've wondered who decided to end Mueller's investigation and why?

What Congress Should Ask Robert Mueller When He Testifies

"11. Many commentators, including highly experienced former federal prosecutors, were surprised by the timing of your end of the investigation while relevant litigation was ongoing and significant actors such as Julian Assange and Roger Stone could still, at least conceivably, flip and cooperate with your investigation, thus potentially yielding new investigations and even prosecutions.

"Please explain fully your reasoning for bringing the investigation to a close when you did."

I would ask what those 14 secret cases were that were spawned by the Mueller report

I would ask what those 14 secret cases were that were spawned by the Mueller report

Obviously, Trump would rather not deal with oversight of any kind.

"Even though Trump avoided a knockout blow from the April 18 Mueller report, the special counsel disclosed more than a dozen active criminal inquiries that will play out for months to come, some possibly into the 2020 election campaign season.

"Details on most of these cases are unclear as they were redacted in the 448-page report.

"Only two were not blacked out: one case versus former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen; and one versus Greg Craig, a former White House counsel in the Obama administration."

Explainer: Probes spawned by Mueller target Trump business, others - Reuters

And yet Trump hid nothing from Mueller's witchhunt, and was still exonerated.

And yet Trump hid nothing from Mueller's witchhunt, and was still exonerated.

He wasn't exonerated with respect to obstruction charges, AND he hid himself from providing testimony directly to (life-long Republican) Bob Mueller.

If that sounds pusillanimous to you, perhaps it isn't surprising that a pathological liar would resist answering questions under oath?
10 episodes where Trump might have obstructed justice

 

[MAGAman]

Assuming the grifters and grafters currently running the Executive Branch decide to permit Robert Mueller to testify before Congress, which questions should Democrats or Republican members pose, and which questions would you ask if given the chance?

For example, I've wondered who decided to end Mueller's investigation and why?

What Congress Should Ask Robert Mueller When He Testifies

"11. Many commentators, including highly experienced former federal prosecutors, were surprised by the timing of your end of the investigation while relevant litigation was ongoing and significant actors such as Julian Assange and Roger Stone could still, at least conceivably, flip and cooperate with your investigation, thus potentially yielding new investigations and even prosecutions.

"Please explain fully your reasoning for bringing the investigation to a close when you did."

I would ask what those 14 secret cases were that were spawned by the Mueller report

I would ask what those 14 secret cases were that were spawned by the Mueller report

Obviously, Trump would rather not deal with oversight of any kind.

"Even though Trump avoided a knockout blow from the April 18 Mueller report, the special counsel disclosed more than a dozen active criminal inquiries that will play out for months to come, some possibly into the 2020 election campaign season.

"Details on most of these cases are unclear as they were redacted in the 448-page report.

"Only two were not blacked out: one case versus former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen; and one versus Greg Craig, a former White House counsel in the Obama administration."

Explainer: Probes spawned by Mueller target Trump business, others - Reuters

And yet Trump hid nothing from Mueller's witchhunt, and was still exonerated.

And yet Trump hid nothing from Mueller's witchhunt, and was still exonerated.

He wasn't exonerated with respect to obstruction charges, AND he hid himself from providing testimony directly to (life-long Republican) Bob Mueller.

If that sounds pusillanimous to you, perhaps it isn't surprising that a pathological liar would resist answering questions under oath?
10 episodes where Trump might have obstructed justice

Mueller had unlimited time and resources and a pack of Trump-Hating prosecutors and found exactly ZERO crimes by Trump.

That's what Exoneration looks like.

 

[bripat9643]

Assuming the grifters and grafters currently running the Executive Branch decide to permit Robert Mueller to testify before Congress, which questions should Democrats or Republican members pose, and which questions would you ask if given the chance?

For example, I've wondered who decided to end Mueller's investigation and why?

What Congress Should Ask Robert Mueller When He Testifies

"11. Many commentators, including highly experienced former federal prosecutors, were surprised by the timing of your end of the investigation while relevant litigation was ongoing and significant actors such as Julian Assange and Roger Stone could still, at least conceivably, flip and cooperate with your investigation, thus potentially yielding new investigations and even prosecutions.

"Please explain fully your reasoning for bringing the investigation to a close when you did."

1) In the second paragraph of your report, you state that “the Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and systematic fashion. Evidence of Russian government operations began to surface in mid-2016.” The report traced this interference back to 2014. Who was the president of the United States when Russia’s attack on our election was unfolding?


2) Since Donald Trump was not president when Russia attacked our electoral process and since you specifically were tasked with conducting “a full and thorough investigation of the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election,” did you investigate why the Obama Administration, including CIA Director John Brennan and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, let this happen?

3) Did you look into any connections between the Hillary Clinton campaign and Russian interests since you also specifically were tasked with investigating “any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation” and it’s widely known that the Clinton campaign was digging up political dirt on Donald Trump from Russian sources before the election?

4) President Trump interviewed you on May 16, 2017 for the job of FBI director. The next day, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appointed you as special counsel. Had you already discussed with Rosenstein the possibility of serving as the special counsel before you interviewed for the FBI director’s job?


5) The report claimed the FBI opened up the counterintelligence probe into the Trump campaign on July 31, 2016 based on an “encounter” between George Papadopoulos, a low-level campaign advisor, and a representative of a foreign government about alleged dirt on Hillary Clinton. But the probe included three other campaign associates, all of whom were cited in the Steele dossier; the public has been assured that the dossier had nothing to do with the investigation. Can you confirm under oath that the dossier was not part of the FBI’s body of evidence to justify launching Crossfire Hurricane?

6) James Comey and several other Justice Department officials used the Steele dossier as its primary source of evidence to obtain a FISA warrant to wiretap Carter Page. They signed the application under penalty of perjury. Would you have signed off on that application?

7) Are you aware of any other FISA warrants on anyone who was associated with the campaign?

8) The report acknowledges that Joseph Mifsud, the so-called professor at the center of the Papadopoulos probe, made false statements to the FBI in early 2017. Did your investigators locate Mifsud to interview him and why has he not been charged him with a crime?

9) Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier, is barely mentioned in your report, although he is a central figure in the Russian collusion probe. According to an April 20, 2019 article in the New York Times, your team “debriefed Mr. Steele himself in London for two days in September 2017.” Why did you debrief as opposed to interview Steele as a witness or subject in this investigation?

10) In Volume II, page 103, in reference to the participants in the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting, you refer to “the firm that produced the Steele reporting.” Why did you intentionally omit citing the name Fusion GPS or its owner, Glenn Simpson, throughout the 448-page report?

11) Did you know that at the same time Fusion GPS was working to collect opposition research on Donald Trump for the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee it also was representing Prevezon, a Russian-based company sanctioned by the U.S. government?

12) Why did you omit the fact that Glenn Simpson was working with Natalia Veselnitskya, the so-called Russian lawyer, on the Prevezon project and that Simpson met with her before the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting that she attended with Trump campaign associates including Donald Trump, Jr.?

13) Why did you also omit the fact the Glenn Simpson was working with Rinat Akhmetshin—another attendee of the Trump Tower meeting—on the Prevezon project and that Simpson met with both Veselnitskya and Akhmetshin the day after the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting?

14) Your office scrubbed the iPhone devices used by Peter Strzok and Lisa Page after they were dismissed from the team. Is that obstruction of justice since both are subjects of ongoing congressional investigations?

15) The report confirmed that on March 9, 2017, Corney briefed congressional leaders about the “FBI’s investigation of Russian interference.” He then testified before the House Intelligence Committee on March 20, 2017, where he publicly revealed for the first time that the FBI had been investigating the Trump campaign (and admitted he withheld that information from Congress for eight months in violation of protocol.) Was this the first time Comey acknowledged to anyone—including Donald Trump—that the campaign had been under investigation since July 2016?

16) At what point did Comey inform Trump that the campaign was under investigation since there is no indication in Comey’s own memos that he disclosed that information to the president at any time prior to March 2017?

17) On page 47 of Volume II, the report states “evidence does establish that the President connected the Flynn investigation to the FBI’s broader Russia investigation and that he believed . . . that terminating Flynn would end ‘the whole Russia thing.’” This appears to conflate two different matters: First, when Trump allegedly made the comment about “letting the Flynn thing go” in February 2017, did he know that his campaign was under investigation for “collusion”?

18) When President Trump allegedly referred to the “whole Russia thing,” do you know if he was referring to the ongoing interference investigations at the FBI and on Capitol Hill or to the collusion investigation?

19) It appears as though Trump’s comment about letting the Flynn matter “go” was in reference to the bogus Logan Act violation being pursued by former acting Attorney General Sally Yates. If Trump did not know in February 2017 that Flynn had been under investigation since July 2016 for “colluding” with the Russians to influence the election, how can his alleged comment to let the Flynn matter “go” be considered an attempt to obstruct the Russia investigation?

20) Aside from Comey’s own memos, do you have additional evidence to support the allegation that the president asked Comey to drop any inquiries related to Michael Flynn?

21) Since you established that former Attorney General Jeff Sessions did not discuss the election during his brief encounters with Russian officials in 2016, do you think it’s appropriate that he nonetheless recused himself?

22) The report cites numerous news articles, including a few that contain classified information sourced by anonymous government officials. As you know, it is a felony to disclose classified information, such as intercepted phone calls with foreign ambassadors under surveillance and the existence of a FISA warrant. Did you identify any of the government officials who were illegally leaking classified information to the news media?

23) Is it illegal for the president of the United States to fire the FBI director, with or without cause?

24) Is it illegal for the president of the United State to consider firing, or to fire, a special counsel?

25) Is it illegal for the president or his advisors to give misleading information to the media?

 

[caddo kid]

Which Questions Would You Ask Mueller?

since the Trump campaign was found NOT to have conspired with the Russians, how do you explain why Trump acted guilty, why Trump talked like he was guilty, why Trump Tweeted like he was guilty, why Trump directed his subordinates & associates to obstruct the investigation, and why did Trump refuse to testify before your investigation in person?

Thanks Bob ............

 

[bripat9643]

Assuming the grifters and grafters currently running the Executive Branch decide to permit Robert Mueller to testify before Congress, which questions should Democrats or Republican members pose, and which questions would you ask if given the chance?

For example, I've wondered who decided to end Mueller's investigation and why?

What Congress Should Ask Robert Mueller When He Testifies

"11. Many commentators, including highly experienced former federal prosecutors, were surprised by the timing of your end of the investigation while relevant litigation was ongoing and significant actors such as Julian Assange and Roger Stone could still, at least conceivably, flip and cooperate with your investigation, thus potentially yielding new investigations and even prosecutions.

"Please explain fully your reasoning for bringing the investigation to a close when you did."

I would ask what those 14 secret cases were that were spawned by the Mueller report

I would ask what those 14 secret cases were that were spawned by the Mueller report

Obviously, Trump would rather not deal with oversight of any kind.

"Even though Trump avoided a knockout blow from the April 18 Mueller report, the special counsel disclosed more than a dozen active criminal inquiries that will play out for months to come, some possibly into the 2020 election campaign season.

"Details on most of these cases are unclear as they were redacted in the 448-page report.

"Only two were not blacked out: one case versus former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen; and one versus Greg Craig, a former White House counsel in the Obama administration."

Explainer: Probes spawned by Mueller target Trump business, others - Reuters

And yet Trump hid nothing from Mueller's witchhunt, and was still exonerated.

And yet Trump hid nothing from Mueller's witchhunt, and was still exonerated.

He wasn't exonerated with respect to obstruction charges, AND he hid himself from providing testimony directly to (life-long Republican) Bob Mueller.

If that sounds pusillanimous to you, perhaps it isn't surprising that a pathological liar would resist answering questions under oath?
10 episodes where Trump might have obstructed justice

Correct answer: None.

 

[bripat9643]

Which Questions Would You Ask Mueller?

since the Trump campaign was found NOT to have conspired with the Russians, how do you explain why Trump acted guilty, why Trump talked like he was guilty, why Trump Tweeted like he was guilty, why Trump directed his subordinates & associates to obstruct the investigation, and why did Trump refuse to testify before your investigation in person?

Thanks Bob ............

He didn't.

 

[georgephillip]

Assuming the grifters and grafters currently running the Executive Branch decide to permit Robert Mueller to testify before Congress, which questions should Democrats or Republican members pose, and which questions would you ask if given the chance?

For example, I've wondered who decided to end Mueller's investigation and why?

What Congress Should Ask Robert Mueller When He Testifies

"11. Many commentators, including highly experienced former federal prosecutors, were surprised by the timing of your end of the investigation while relevant litigation was ongoing and significant actors such as Julian Assange and Roger Stone could still, at least conceivably, flip and cooperate with your investigation, thus potentially yielding new investigations and even prosecutions.

"Please explain fully your reasoning for bringing the investigation to a close when you did."

I would ask what those 14 secret cases were that were spawned by the Mueller report

I would ask what those 14 secret cases were that were spawned by the Mueller report

Obviously, Trump would rather not deal with oversight of any kind.

"Even though Trump avoided a knockout blow from the April 18 Mueller report, the special counsel disclosed more than a dozen active criminal inquiries that will play out for months to come, some possibly into the 2020 election campaign season.

"Details on most of these cases are unclear as they were redacted in the 448-page report.

"Only two were not blacked out: one case versus former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen; and one versus Greg Craig, a former White House counsel in the Obama administration."

Explainer: Probes spawned by Mueller target Trump business, others - Reuters

And yet Trump hid nothing from Mueller's witchhunt, and was still exonerated.

And yet Trump hid nothing from Mueller's witchhunt, and was still exonerated.

He wasn't exonerated with respect to obstruction charges, AND he hid himself from providing testimony directly to (life-long Republican) Bob Mueller.

If that sounds pusillanimous to you, perhaps it isn't surprising that a pathological liar would resist answering questions under oath?
10 episodes where Trump might have obstructed justice

Mueller had unlimited time and resources and a pack of Trump-Hating prosecutors and found exactly ZERO crimes by Trump.

That's what Exoneration looks like.

Mueller had unlimited time and resources and a pack of Trump-Hating prosecutors and found exactly ZERO crimes by Trump.

That's what Exoneration looks like.

10 episodes where Trump might have obstructed justice

"Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team found 10 instances where President Donald Trump’s conduct raised issues of possible obstruction of justice.

"They included Trump’s request to then-White House counsel Donald McGahn to remove Mueller from his post, evidence that Trump’s firing of FBI Director James Comey was motivated by a desire to prevent further inquiry into Russian interference in the 2016 election, and various alleged attempts to influence witnesses such as Michael Flynn and Paul Manafort."

Ten possible examples of Trump attempting to obstruct justice, and Mueller didn't have access to Trump's financial document.

Just imagine how much more we'll learn about Trump's crimes when the remaining twenty-nine investigations into his gangster background release their results?

Tracking 29 Investigations Related to Trump

 

[AZGAL]

Mueller what is your paycheck as the taxpayer is paying you...

 

[Hiryuu]

Who told you that?

... And President of the United States, who will probably be re-elected if the above is the only thing the opposition can bring to the table.

 

[georgephillip]

Assuming the grifters and grafters currently running the Executive Branch decide to permit Robert Mueller to testify before Congress, which questions should Democrats or Republican members pose, and which questions would you ask if given the chance?

For example, I've wondered who decided to end Mueller's investigation and why?

What Congress Should Ask Robert Mueller When He Testifies

"11. Many commentators, including highly experienced former federal prosecutors, were surprised by the timing of your end of the investigation while relevant litigation was ongoing and significant actors such as Julian Assange and Roger Stone could still, at least conceivably, flip and cooperate with your investigation, thus potentially yielding new investigations and even prosecutions.

"Please explain fully your reasoning for bringing the investigation to a close when you did."

I would ask what those 14 secret cases were that were spawned by the Mueller report

I would ask what those 14 secret cases were that were spawned by the Mueller report

Obviously, Trump would rather not deal with oversight of any kind.

"Even though Trump avoided a knockout blow from the April 18 Mueller report, the special counsel disclosed more than a dozen active criminal inquiries that will play out for months to come, some possibly into the 2020 election campaign season.

"Details on most of these cases are unclear as they were redacted in the 448-page report.

"Only two were not blacked out: one case versus former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen; and one versus Greg Craig, a former White House counsel in the Obama administration."

Explainer: Probes spawned by Mueller target Trump business, others - Reuters

And yet Trump hid nothing from Mueller's witchhunt, and was still exonerated.

And yet Trump hid nothing from Mueller's witchhunt, and was still exonerated.

He wasn't exonerated with respect to obstruction charges, AND he hid himself from providing testimony directly to (life-long Republican) Bob Mueller.

If that sounds pusillanimous to you, perhaps it isn't surprising that a pathological liar would resist answering questions under oath?
10 episodes where Trump might have obstructed justice

Correct answer: None.

Correct answer: None

Remove your partisan blinders and start here if searching for instances where Trump attempted to obstruct justice:

10 episodes where Trump might have obstructed justice

"Later that afternoon, the President clear the Oval Office to have a one-on-one meeting with Comey. Referring to the FBI’s investigation of Flynn, the President said, 'I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go,'

"Shortly after requesting Flynn’s resignation and speaking privately to Comey, the President sought to have Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland draft an internal letter stating that the President had not directed Flynn to discuss sanctions with Kislyak.

"McFarland declined because she did not know whether that was true, and a White House Counsel’s Office attorney thought that the request would look like a quid pro quo for an ambassadorship she had been offered."

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Why did you bother to accept the assignment when you knew Justice wouldn’t indict Trump no matter how compelling, objective, and documented the evidence of Trump’s criminal wrongdoing?

And given the fact that Justice wouldn’t indict, were you so naïve as to believe House Democrats would impeach Trump regardless how compelling, objective, and documented the evidence of Trump’s criminal wrongdoing?

Last, are you so foolish as to leave the matter to the states to decide the fate of Trump in the next General Election, regardless how compelling, objective, and documented the evidence of Trump’s criminal wrongdoing, given the 2016 debacle?

 

[georgephillip]

Who told you that?

... And President of the United States, who will probably be re-elected if the above is the only thing the opposition can bring to the table.

And President of the United States, who will probably be re-elected if the above is the only thing the opposition can bring to the table.

Never Underestimate Trump.

 

[Hiryuu]

Never Underestimate Trump.

That's kind of what it looked like last time in 2016, so how did that work out for ya?