Which loopholes would Mitt/Ryan plug?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Luddly Neddite, Sep 9, 2012.

  1. Luddly Neddite
    Offline

    Luddly Neddite Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2011
    Messages:
    58,737
    Thanks Received:
    9,084
    Trophy Points:
    2,040
    Ratings:
    +24,588
  2. kyzr
    Offline

    kyzr Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,881
    Thanks Received:
    533
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Ratings:
    +1,169
    The DC coxuckers never close any loop-holes. That's the problem. I like sequestration, its an automatic cut of $1-trillion. Its progress. The downside is a 1% bump in unemployment for about 3-months. Good trade.

    we don't need loop-holes closed if we get the Clinton tax rates back, and the bonus is sequestration. Its like DC accidentally did something good?!
     
  3. Wacky Quacky
    Offline

    Wacky Quacky Silver Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,824
    Thanks Received:
    327
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Ratings:
    +376
    How does raising taxes help if there are still loopholes to avoid it?

    I think you got it backwards. We don't need higher tax rates, we need loopholes closed. That would generate more revenue with no chance of dodging it.

    (Disclaimer: I only support revenue increases if and when the government proves they won't blow it on more bullshit. Meaningful cuts first, then increase revenue.)
     
  4. Rozman
    Offline

    Rozman Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2009
    Messages:
    16,677
    Thanks Received:
    3,076
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Brooklyn,NY
    Ratings:
    +6,777
    Let's close whatever ones need to be closed... :D
     
  5. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    71,501
    Thanks Received:
    13,254
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +23,893
    the problem is the things that are going to be cut... shouldn't be cut.

    but yes, getting the clinton tax rates back would be a big improvement financially. it's like the right wants to create a deficit by cutting taxes to the bone, so they can complain about a deficit.

    because heaven forbid the federal government should actually be able to function.
     
  6. Wacky Quacky
    Offline

    Wacky Quacky Silver Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,824
    Thanks Received:
    327
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Ratings:
    +376
    A big improvement, IF they don't spend it all on more wasteful spending. I wouldn't hold my breath on that one. The government could more than likely function very well with the amount they bring in now, but there's so much waste, fraud, and abuse that they seem to be horribly underfunded.
     

Share This Page