Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They cite the FBI stats, idiot. There are links directly to the FBI crime reports on that page.
Yes leave it to a far left drone to find a hyper partisan site for their "facts"..
In other words they have nothing! Just far left religious dogma!
They cite the FBI stats, idiot. There are links directly to the FBI on that page.
Yes leave it to a far left drone to find a hyper partisan site for their "facts"..
In other words they have nothing! Just far left religious dogma!
Can you get more willfully stupid? Really?
Murder rate per 100,000.
The Top Ten:
Louisiana: 11.8
Alabama: 8.4
Missouri: 8.8
Illinois: 8.2
Maryland: 8.0
Mississippi: 8.0
Nevada: 7.6
South Carolina: 7.4
Arkansas: 7.2
Alaska: 7.0
One easy question, where was God?
Those advanced nations which have banned guns have a much lower homicide rate than we do.Please tell me how having me give up or forcing me to give up my firearms will prevent anyone from being killedA couple dozen people slaughtered in a church is a small price to pay for our second amendment freedoms
And a few dozen people in Vegas, and a few dozen somewhere else next week or the week after.
But why is it that when it comes to terrorists, nothing is a small price to pay for freedoms? Why is religious freedom not a price to pay?
Some innocent people may be killed
But at least we have our guns
Collateral damage
As a general rule, those states with laxer gun laws have higher homicide rates.
We have to be honest and admit that banning guns would result in a lower homicide rate. But that would require the repeal of the Second Amendment.
So it really is a choice between a higher homicide rate and liberty. It is completely dishonest to deny this.
Report: Murder Rates Remain Same in Tough Gun Law Statesand you know that is factually incorrect. been debunked in here again and again. but that is who you are, posting lies. why don't you post statistics that agree with your position? don't ask me or anyone else to debunk again. You post it this time.Those advanced nations which have banned guns have a much lower homicide rate than we do.Please tell me how having me give up or forcing me to give up my firearms will prevent anyone from being killedAnd a few dozen people in Vegas, and a few dozen somewhere else next week or the week after.
But why is it that when it comes to terrorists, nothing is a small price to pay for freedoms? Why is religious freedom not a price to pay?
Some innocent people may be killed
But at least we have our guns
Collateral damage
As a general rule, those states with laxer gun laws have higher homicide rates.
We have to be honest and admit that banning guns would result in a lower homicide rate. But that would require the repeal of the Second Amendment.
So it really is a choice between a higher homicide rate and liberty. It is completely dishonest to deny this.
can you give me your links? if i look up by state, california and illinois isn't where i'd have thought.
Top 30 Highest Murder Rate Cities in the U.S. 2017 - NeighborhoodScout - cities
List of U.S. states by homicide rate - Wikipedia - states
.Death by gun: Top 20 states with highest rates - specific to guns
kinda a mixed bag but i don't see a lot to point one way or another in relation to the laws of the state.
not for banning guns at all. that isn't going to happen and asking is only going to make ANY compromise impossible. just looking for more relevant stats.
correct, create a gun law to disarm the criminal, then come tell the law abiding citizens to turn theirs in.Those advanced nations which have banned guns have a much lower homicide rate than we do.Please tell me how having me give up or forcing me to give up my firearms will prevent anyone from being killedA couple dozen people slaughtered in a church is a small price to pay for our second amendment freedoms
And a few dozen people in Vegas, and a few dozen somewhere else next week or the week after.
But why is it that when it comes to terrorists, nothing is a small price to pay for freedoms? Why is religious freedom not a price to pay?
Some innocent people may be killed
But at least we have our guns
Collateral damage
As a general rule, those states with laxer gun laws have higher homicide rates.
We have to be honest and admit that banning guns would result in a lower homicide rate. But that would require the repeal of the Second Amendment.
So it really is a choice between a higher homicide rate and liberty. It is completely dishonest to deny this.
I would disagree. There are a number of factors involved in a nation's homicide rate besides their gun laws, and to unequivocally state that banning guns altogether in this country would without question lower homicide rates is wrong, or at best unknown. What works elsewhere may not necessarily have the same effect here. Does anyone think that banning all guns in the USA would be acceptable and complied with to a large extent? Pretty sure the gangs and crooks won't give up their weapons, and the terrorists won't either. And a large number of gun owners won't either.
and you know that is factually incorrect. been debunked in here again and again. but that is who you are, posting lies.Those advanced nations which have banned guns have a much lower homicide rate than we do.Please tell me how having me give up or forcing me to give up my firearms will prevent anyone from being killedAnd a few dozen people in Vegas, and a few dozen somewhere else next week or the week after.
But why is it that when it comes to terrorists, nothing is a small price to pay for freedoms? Why is religious freedom not a price to pay?
Some innocent people may be killed
But at least we have our guns
Collateral damage
As a general rule, those states with laxer gun laws have higher homicide rates.
We have to be honest and admit that banning guns would result in a lower homicide rate. But that would require the repeal of the Second Amendment.
So it really is a choice between a higher homicide rate and liberty. It is completely dishonest to deny this.
It is also a fact that the states which have the loosest gun laws have the highest homicide rates.
You deliberately buried the lead:Report: Murder Rates Remain Same in Tough Gun Law Statesand you know that is factually incorrect. been debunked in here again and again. but that is who you are, posting lies. why don't you post statistics that agree with your position? don't ask me or anyone else to debunk again. You post it this time.Those advanced nations which have banned guns have a much lower homicide rate than we do.Please tell me how having me give up or forcing me to give up my firearms will prevent anyone from being killedSome innocent people may be killed
But at least we have our guns
Collateral damage
As a general rule, those states with laxer gun laws have higher homicide rates.
We have to be honest and admit that banning guns would result in a lower homicide rate. But that would require the repeal of the Second Amendment.
So it really is a choice between a higher homicide rate and liberty. It is completely dishonest to deny this.
can you give me your links? if i look up by state, california and illinois isn't where i'd have thought.
Top 30 Highest Murder Rate Cities in the U.S. 2017 - NeighborhoodScout - cities
List of U.S. states by homicide rate - Wikipedia - states
.Death by gun: Top 20 states with highest rates - specific to guns
kinda a mixed bag but i don't see a lot to point one way or another in relation to the laws of the state.
not for banning guns at all. that isn't going to happen and asking is only going to make ANY compromise impossible. just looking for more relevant stats.
"Surprised by Findings The head of the center, Sarah Brady, is married to James Brady, for whom the act is named. Brady was the press secretary wounded and paralyzed in the 1981 assassination attempt on President Reagan.
As implemented in 1994, the Brady Act required licensed dealers to perform background checks and observe a five-day waiting period before selling handguns. In 1998, instant background checks replaced the waiting period requirement.
Eighteen states already met the Brady requirements in 1994.
The lead authors of the study, Georgetown University policy analyst Jens Ludwig and Philip Cook of Duke University, examined national statistics from 1985 through 1997 to compare the Brady law’s impact on crime in the 32 states that had to toughen their laws.
The authors noted that homicide and suicide rates had already begun to decline nationwide before 1994, but they assumed those rates would fall faster in “treatment states” — those that had to adopt new laws to comply."
Gun Laws vs Gun Deaths
"Firearm legislation is a much discussed issue these days, and there are many opinions that surround it. Statistics can even be unpacked to adhere to certain viewpoints on the topic. For example, the U.S. has the highest rate of gun violence when compared with Western Europe, but falls around the median when compared with countries in North and South America.
Similarly, some states have more issues with firearms than others. The South, in particular, is a consistently high-risk area for firearm violence, while California and much of the Northeast have per capita rates that pale in comparison. However, some states with strict gun laws, such as Illinois, can still have significant rates of gun deaths, while states with extremely lax gun legislation, such as Arizona, aren’t quite as high on the list as you might expect.
Knowing the facts about firearms, crime trends in the U.S., and the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of gun legislation are a vital part of staying safe and informed. Continue reading to see the relationship between gun laws and gun deaths in the U.S."
I've been posting it, willfully blind monkey.and you know that is factually incorrect. been debunked in here again and again. but that is who you are, posting lies.Those advanced nations which have banned guns have a much lower homicide rate than we do.Please tell me how having me give up or forcing me to give up my firearms will prevent anyone from being killedSome innocent people may be killed
But at least we have our guns
Collateral damage
As a general rule, those states with laxer gun laws have higher homicide rates.
We have to be honest and admit that banning guns would result in a lower homicide rate. But that would require the repeal of the Second Amendment.
So it really is a choice between a higher homicide rate and liberty. It is completely dishonest to deny this.
It is also a fact that the states which have the loosest gun laws have the highest homicide rates.
Let's see the data.
Sent from my SM-J727VPP using USMessageBoard.com mobile app
/----/In the photo attached, can you spot the person who kept his gun and the ones who lost their lives? Take a few minutes to decide.A simple question.
Yesterday 26 people were shot and killed, some of them kids.
Life is going down the drain for lots of people in the US due to guns.
Which would you prefer, to keep your guns or to keep your life?
No they don't in fact Britain is seeing an INCREASE and has been for several years. And they are an ISLAND with complete control over what entersNope. It has never been debunked.and you know that is factually incorrect. been debunked in here again and again. but that is who you are, posting lies.Those advanced nations which have banned guns have a much lower homicide rate than we do.Please tell me how having me give up or forcing me to give up my firearms will prevent anyone from being killedAnd a few dozen people in Vegas, and a few dozen somewhere else next week or the week after.
But why is it that when it comes to terrorists, nothing is a small price to pay for freedoms? Why is religious freedom not a price to pay?
Some innocent people may be killed
But at least we have our guns
Collateral damage
As a general rule, those states with laxer gun laws have higher homicide rates.
We have to be honest and admit that banning guns would result in a lower homicide rate. But that would require the repeal of the Second Amendment.
So it really is a choice between a higher homicide rate and liberty. It is completely dishonest to deny this.
It is a fact that advanced countries which give up their guns see a drop in the homicide rate in the long term.
It is also a fact that the states which have the loosest gun laws have the highest homicide rates.
Freedom isn't free. Period.
You asked for data which proves homicide rates are higher in lax gun control states, and now you are pretending you don't konw what that link proves?I'm not sure what I'm reading with your link. what is it you're trying to prove? I thought it was about guns. you deflecting as usual. I see.
Guns are an acceptable risk to be American. Bill of Rights ensures we shall not be disarmed
-Geaux
Ok IDIOT how do you plan to confiscate firearms from criminals?So as I was saying, and just proved, an honest person will admit that confiscating all guns will cause the homicide rate to plummet.
It just requires us to repeal the Second Amendment and become an even bigger police state than we already are.
The decision is between lower homicide rates or liberty.
Everything else is bullshit.