Where's Obuma's Red Line Now?..isis Kills 300 Iraqi Soldiers By Chlorine Gas Attack In Saqlawiyah

[Vigilante]

Oh, that's right, he said that about Syria, then punked out.... Iraq is no big deal for the obomanation!

On Monday several Members of Parliament from Diwaniyah Province confirmed that ISIS killed over 300 soldiers using chlorine gas for the first time in Saqlawiyah, north of Fallujah.Islamic Dawa party MP Ali al-Badri said, at a press conference at the parliament building in the presence of a number of deputies of Diwaniyah province and attended by IraqiNews.com that “the terrorist organization ISIS used chlorine gas for the first time in the region of Saqlawiyah after trapping more than 400 troops, resulting in the deaths of many of them due to suffocation while the terrorist gangs detonated car bombs within the...

URGENT ISIS kills 300 Iraqi soldiers by chlorine gas attack in Saqlawiyah - Iraqi News

 

[rightwinger]

Do you think we should invade again?

 

[Vigilante]

Do you think we should invade again?

We should have never left in the first place..... The obuma fucked up again!

 

[rightwinger]

Do you think we should invade again?

We should have never left in the first place..... The obuma fucked up again!

Very good now we are getting somewhere

How many troops do you want to return to Iraq?
How many additional US casualties are you willing to accept?

 

[Vigilante]

Do you think we should invade again?

We should have never left in the first place..... The obuma fucked up again!

Very good now we are getting somewhere

How many troops do you want to return to Iraq?
How many additional US casualties are you willing to accept?

As the obomanation refuses to listen to the generals, it should be up to LEARNED and EXPERIENCED military leaders to RUN the operations that are necessary.... How many more ISIS deaths, beheadings of Americans, and a Frenchman tomorrow are you willing to TURN YOUR HEAD ON, Mr. Chamberlain? How many Islamist American's that fought with ISIS and returned to America would you say is SAFE?

 

[deltex1]

Note that the LIBTARDS will not condemn the attack. They don't want their asshole drawing another imaginary red line.

 

[rightwinger]

Do you think we should invade again?

We should have never left in the first place..... The obuma fucked up again!

Very good now we are getting somewhere

How many troops do you want to return to Iraq?
How many additional US casualties are you willing to accept?

As the obomanation refuses to listen to the generals, it should be up to LEARNED and EXPERIENCED military leaders to RUN the operations that are necessary.... How many more ISIS deaths, beheadings of Americans, and a Frenchman tomorrow are you willing to TURN YOUR HEAD ON, Mr. Chamberlain? How many Islamist American's that fought with ISIS and returned to America would you say is SAFE?

Now we are making some progress

Fighting ISIS will take US boots on the ground to satisfy you. How many do you want in Iraq and how many casualties are you willing to accept to put down ISIS?

It is easy to gripe from the sidelines and nobody likes beheadings. But your solution involves additional US soldiers getting killed.....my question to you is how many?

 

[Vigilante]

 

[Vigilante]

Do you think we should invade again?

We should have never left in the first place..... The obuma fucked up again!

Very good now we are getting somewhere

How many troops do you want to return to Iraq?
How many additional US casualties are you willing to accept?

As the obomanation refuses to listen to the generals, it should be up to LEARNED and EXPERIENCED military leaders to RUN the operations that are necessary.... How many more ISIS deaths, beheadings of Americans, and a Frenchman tomorrow are you willing to TURN YOUR HEAD ON, Mr. Chamberlain? How many Islamist American's that fought with ISIS and returned to America would you say is SAFE?

Now we are making some progress

Fighting ISIS will take US boots on the ground to satisfy you. How many do you want in Iraq and how many casualties are you willing to accept to put down ISIS?

It is easy to gripe from the sidelines and nobody likes beheadings. But your solution involves additional US soldiers getting killed.....my question to you is how many?

Apparently YOU have a failure of comprehension when I wrote whatever our military leaders deem necessary.... Now, Mr. Chamberlain, answer my questions!

 

[rightwinger]

OK ......we got it

You are demanding a red line. How many US troops are you willing to commit to enforce your red line.

 

[rightwinger]

Do you think we should invade again?

We should have never left in the first place..... The obuma fucked up again!

Very good now we are getting somewhere

How many troops do you want to return to Iraq?
How many additional US casualties are you willing to accept?

As the obomanation refuses to listen to the generals, it should be up to LEARNED and EXPERIENCED military leaders to RUN the operations that are necessary.... How many more ISIS deaths, beheadings of Americans, and a Frenchman tomorrow are you willing to TURN YOUR HEAD ON, Mr. Chamberlain? How many Islamist American's that fought with ISIS and returned to America would you say is SAFE?

Now we are making some progress

Fighting ISIS will take US boots on the ground to satisfy you. How many do you want in Iraq and how many casualties are you willing to accept to put down ISIS?

It is easy to gripe from the sidelines and nobody likes beheadings. But your solution involves additional US soldiers getting killed.....my question to you is how many?

Apparently YOU have a failure of comprehension when I wrote whatever our military leaders deem necessary.... Now, Mr. Chamberlain, answer my questions!

OK........and which US military leaders are calling for boots on the ground?

You have names don't ya?

 

[Vigilante]

OK ......we got it

You are demanding a red line. How many US troops are you willing to commit to enforce your red line.

Simply showing the worthlessness of whatever obuma says about fighting ISIS....Like you, all bloviating, no substance...and apparently you are unwilling to answer the questions posed to you in # 5.... But thanks for playing, and showing just what a lefty sycophant you are!

 

[Kondor3]

...Fighting ISIS will take US boots on the ground to satisfy you...

Make that '...will take US boots on the ground in order to defeat ISIS..."

...How many do you want in Iraq...

If we do end-up going in, no fewer than 200,000.

...and how many casualties are you willing to accept to put down ISIS?...

2,000 dead.

20,000 wounded.

ISIS, left un-checked, will, in 20 years, require ten times as many, to put down.

If not more.

Best to kill that beastie before it ripens and matures.

An investment of a modest amount of blood now will prove wiser than a much higher price tag later.

Or to it seems at-present to this observer.

...It is easy to gripe from the sidelines...

Indeed.

 

[Vigilante]

We should have never left in the first place..... The obuma fucked up again!

Very good now we are getting somewhere

How many troops do you want to return to Iraq?
How many additional US casualties are you willing to accept?

As the obomanation refuses to listen to the generals, it should be up to LEARNED and EXPERIENCED military leaders to RUN the operations that are necessary.... How many more ISIS deaths, beheadings of Americans, and a Frenchman tomorrow are you willing to TURN YOUR HEAD ON, Mr. Chamberlain? How many Islamist American's that fought with ISIS and returned to America would you say is SAFE?

Now we are making some progress

Fighting ISIS will take US boots on the ground to satisfy you. How many do you want in Iraq and how many casualties are you willing to accept to put down ISIS?

It is easy to gripe from the sidelines and nobody likes beheadings. But your solution involves additional US soldiers getting killed.....my question to you is how many?

Apparently YOU have a failure of comprehension when I wrote whatever our military leaders deem necessary.... Now, Mr. Chamberlain, answer my questions!

OK........and which US military leaders are calling for boots on the ground?

You have names don't ya?

What's the matter Boy, can't Google it yourself?

Retired Marine Gen. James Mattis, who served under Obama until last year, became the latest high-profile skeptic on Thursday, telling the House Intelligence Committee that a blanket prohibition on ground combat was tying the military’s hands.

Rift widens between Obama U.S. military over strategy to fight Islamic State - The Washington Post

 

[Jarlaxle]

Do you think we should invade again?

Either walk away and let them kill each other or sterilize the place with neutron bombs.

 

[rightwinger]

...Fighting ISIS will take US boots on the ground to satisfy you...

Make that '...will take US boots on the ground in order to defeat ISIS..."

...How many do you want in Iraq...

If we do end-up going in, no fewer than 200,000.

...and how many casualties are you willing to accept to put down ISIS?...

2,000 dead.

20,000 wounded.

ISIS, left un-checked, will, in 20 years, require ten times as many, to put down.

If not more.

Best to kill that beastie before it ripens and matures.

An investment of a modest amount of blood now will prove wiser than a much higher price tag later.

Or to it seems at-present to this observer.

...It is easy to gripe from the sidelines...

Indeed.

Winner, winner chicken dinner. There you have it 200,000 troops, another trillion dollars and ONLY 2000 dead and 20,000 maimed

Another example of what happens when you allow the neocon chicken hawks to make decisions

 

[rightwinger]

Do you think we should invade again?

Either walk away and let them kill each other or sterilize the place with neutron bombs.

I say fuck em. Not our problem

 

[HenryBHough]

Watercolour painters of cute little red lines forget that even in the desert it sometimes rains. Also forgotten....that urine will wash it out every time, not just turn it your favourite shade of edible orange.

 

[Vigilante]

...Fighting ISIS will take US boots on the ground to satisfy you...

Make that '...will take US boots on the ground in order to defeat ISIS..."

...How many do you want in Iraq...

If we do end-up going in, no fewer than 200,000.

...and how many casualties are you willing to accept to put down ISIS?...

2,000 dead.

20,000 wounded.

ISIS, left un-checked, will, in 20 years, require ten times as many, to put down.

If not more.

Best to kill that beastie before it ripens and matures.

An investment of a modest amount of blood now will prove wiser than a much higher price tag later.

Or to it seems at-present to this observer.

...It is easy to gripe from the sidelines...

Indeed.

Winner, winner chicken dinner. There you have it 200,000 troops, another trillion dollars and ONLY 2000 dead and 20,000 maimed

Another example of what happens when you allow the neocon chicken hawks to make decisions

 

[EconChick]

Oh, that's right, he said that about Syria, then punked out.... Iraq is no big deal for the obomanation!

On Monday several Members of Parliament from Diwaniyah Province confirmed that ISIS killed over 300 soldiers using chlorine gas for the first time in Saqlawiyah, north of Fallujah.Islamic Dawa party MP Ali al-Badri said, at a press conference at the parliament building in the presence of a number of deputies of Diwaniyah province and attended by IraqiNews.com that “the terrorist organization ISIS used chlorine gas for the first time in the region of Saqlawiyah after trapping more than 400 troops, resulting in the deaths of many of them due to suffocation while the terrorist gangs detonated car bombs within the...

URGENT ISIS kills 300 Iraqi soldiers by chlorine gas attack in Saqlawiyah - Iraqi News

Yep, his red line is the reason ISIS is so emboldened. ISIS can be seen saying that. Don't expect libs to understand the concept....they put me on hold and take me off multiple times in one day, LOL.