When it comes to UNITED NATIONS REFUGEES top Democrats, RINO, press barons, the sign-carrying parasite class, and of course the New World Order crowd are the ESTABLISHMENT. The number of UNITED NATIONS REFUGEES is bigger than the number of people in the ESTABLISHMENT:
Case studies that show a direct correlation between Islamic immigration and incidents of terrorism. Like Japan, the country of Poland accepts no Muslim migrants and has experienced virtually no terrorism, as the above map indicates with dots representing documented cases of terror in Europe.
United Nations refugees is the push that is needed to pass the American Sovereignty Restoration Act. I have one question. Can the American people stop this sewer from draining into the Washington D.C. swamp?
https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/x/united-nations-1184547.jpg
Incidentally, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act has been introduced and reintroduced for 20 years and never got out of committee. (H. R. 193 is this year’s title.)
NOTE: Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, and establishment Republicans do not inspire confidence. Irrespective of their loyalties there is a good chance the American Sovereignty Restoration Act will finally pass now that Americans are asking why and how the United Nations came to dictate this country’s immigration policy?
H. R. 193 in its entirety is a thing of beauty, but I want to single out Section 6 for an extra plug:
Text - H.R.193 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017
Finally, manipulating Democrats into voting for the United Nations; that is voting for open-borders, before next year’s elections will cost them at least 75 percent of the congressional seats they hold. I seriously doubt if there will be a single Democrat in Congress after 2020.
Case studies that show a direct correlation between Islamic immigration and incidents of terrorism. Like Japan, the country of Poland accepts no Muslim migrants and has experienced virtually no terrorism, as the above map indicates with dots representing documented cases of terror in Europe.
President Trump proposed a temporary halt on refugee resettlement from six countries known to harbor Islamic terrorists, and the U.S. establishment went into convulsions, a level of hysteria not seen over any policy ever proposed by a modern-day president.
But in Japan there is no such debate about refugees. That’s because the Asian nation has a permanent ban on refugees from Muslim countries.
Meanwhile the Japanese live in peace.
Terrorism is not happening in Poland, either.
Nor is it happening in Slovenia or Hungary.
“The U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees has been haranguing Japan for years to open its doors (and begin diluting their culture) to the masses of Middle Eastern and African (mostly Muslim) migrants on the move around the world,” Corcoran writes. “I have not seen the UNHCR harangue China, Saudi Arabia or some other Middle Eastern countries in the same way they nag Japan.”
But in Japan there is no such debate about refugees. That’s because the Asian nation has a permanent ban on refugees from Muslim countries.
XXXXX
Meanwhile the Japanese live in peace.
Terrorism is not happening in Poland, either.
Nor is it happening in Slovenia or Hungary.
XXXXX
“The U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees has been haranguing Japan for years to open its doors (and begin diluting their culture) to the masses of Middle Eastern and African (mostly Muslim) migrants on the move around the world,” Corcoran writes. “I have not seen the UNHCR harangue China, Saudi Arabia or some other Middle Eastern countries in the same way they nag Japan.”
Why this G7 nation has no problem with Islamic terrorism
Posted By Leo Hohmann On 05/26/2017 @ 8:16
Why this G7 nation has no problem with Islamic terrorism
Posted By Leo Hohmann On 05/26/2017 @ 8:16
Why this G7 nation has no problem with Islamic terrorism
United Nations refugees is the push that is needed to pass the American Sovereignty Restoration Act. I have one question. Can the American people stop this sewer from draining into the Washington D.C. swamp?
Incidentally, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act has been introduced and reintroduced for 20 years and never got out of committee. (H. R. 193 is this year’s title.)
NOTE: Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, and establishment Republicans do not inspire confidence. Irrespective of their loyalties there is a good chance the American Sovereignty Restoration Act will finally pass now that Americans are asking why and how the United Nations came to dictate this country’s immigration policy?
H. R. 193 in its entirety is a thing of beauty, but I want to single out Section 6 for an extra plug:
SEC. 6. Withdrawal of United Nations presence in facilities of the government of the United States and repeal of diplomatic immunity.
(a) Withdrawal from United States Government property.—The United Nations (including any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations) may not occupy or use any property or facility of the United States Government.
(b) Diplomatic immunity.—No officer or employee of the United Nations (including any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations) or any representative, officer, or employee of any mission to the United Nations of any foreign government shall be entitled to enjoy the privileges and immunities of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of April 18, 1961, nor may any such privileges and immunities be extended to any such individual. The privileges, exemptions, and immunities provided for in the International Organizations Immunities Act of December 29, 1945 (59 Stat. 669; 22 U.S.C. 288 et seq.), or in any agreement or treaty to which the United States is a party, including the agreement entitled “Agreement Between the United Nations and the United States of America Regarding the Headquarters of the United Nations”, signed June 26, 1947 (22 U.S.C. 287 note), and the Convention on Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations, entered into force with respect to the United States on April 29, 1970 (21 UST 1418; TIAS 6900; UNTS 16), shall not apply to the United Nations or to any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations, to the officers and employees of the United Nations, or of any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations, or to the families, suites, or servants of such officers or employees.
(a) Withdrawal from United States Government property.—The United Nations (including any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations) may not occupy or use any property or facility of the United States Government.
(b) Diplomatic immunity.—No officer or employee of the United Nations (including any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations) or any representative, officer, or employee of any mission to the United Nations of any foreign government shall be entitled to enjoy the privileges and immunities of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of April 18, 1961, nor may any such privileges and immunities be extended to any such individual. The privileges, exemptions, and immunities provided for in the International Organizations Immunities Act of December 29, 1945 (59 Stat. 669; 22 U.S.C. 288 et seq.), or in any agreement or treaty to which the United States is a party, including the agreement entitled “Agreement Between the United Nations and the United States of America Regarding the Headquarters of the United Nations”, signed June 26, 1947 (22 U.S.C. 287 note), and the Convention on Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations, entered into force with respect to the United States on April 29, 1970 (21 UST 1418; TIAS 6900; UNTS 16), shall not apply to the United Nations or to any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations, to the officers and employees of the United Nations, or of any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations, or to the families, suites, or servants of such officers or employees.
Text - H.R.193 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017
Finally, manipulating Democrats into voting for the United Nations; that is voting for open-borders, before next year’s elections will cost them at least 75 percent of the congressional seats they hold. I seriously doubt if there will be a single Democrat in Congress after 2020.
Last edited: