Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You'd still have the right to bear arms even if certain guns are banned. There's no mention of you being able to bear any weapon ever made.How about 500,000 people bearing their handguns, AR-15s, AK-47s, shotguns, and whatever other arms they legally own, marching through the streets of D.C. to demand that Congress preserve their rights? Maybe surround the Capitol building why they're at it. We need this to happen.
You'd still have the right to bear arms even if certain guns are banned. There's no mention of you being able to bear any weapon ever made.How about 500,000 people bearing their handguns, AR-15s, AK-47s, shotguns, and whatever other arms they legally own, marching through the streets of D.C. to demand that Congress preserve their rights? Maybe surround the Capitol building why they're at it. We need this to happen.
How about 500,000 people bearing their handguns, AR-15s, AK-47s, shotguns, and whatever other arms they legally own, marching through the streets of D.C. to demand that Congress preserve their rights? Maybe surround the Capitol building why they're at it. We need this to happen.
Then make it happen. Fish or cut bait.How about 500,000 people bearing their handguns, AR-15s, AK-47s, shotguns, and whatever other arms they legally own, marching through the streets of D.C. to demand that Congress preserve their rights? Maybe surround the Capitol building why they're at it. We need this to happen.
Writings on paper with a pen or even a pencil have been court approved as free speech already (within the usual limits of course), so you lose there. Writings on internet also have the same court declared protection of free speech (like I said, within the usual limits). Another loss.You'd still have the right to bear arms even if certain guns are banned. There's no mention of you being able to bear any weapon ever made.How about 500,000 people bearing their handguns, AR-15s, AK-47s, shotguns, and whatever other arms they legally own, marching through the streets of D.C. to demand that Congress preserve their rights? Maybe surround the Capitol building why they're at it. We need this to happen.
In that case, let's take away your internet and your paper and all your pens. You still have the right to speech. There's no mention of you being able to speak through any method ever made.
/----/ That's not the Progs end game and you know it.You'd still have the right to bear arms even if certain guns are banned. There's no mention of you being able to bear any weapon ever made.How about 500,000 people bearing their handguns, AR-15s, AK-47s, shotguns, and whatever other arms they legally own, marching through the streets of D.C. to demand that Congress preserve their rights? Maybe surround the Capitol building why they're at it. We need this to happen.
Btw, nice sock.
Writings on paper with a pen or even a pencil have been court approved as free speech already (within the usual limits of course), so you lose there. Writings on internet also have the same court declared protection of free speech (like I said, within the usual limits). Another loss.
Got anything else?
That's not happening, despite a few people with signs. When Obummer was in charge, pretty much nothing was done, so that's a red herring. And it wouldn't surprise me at all if those people with signs are paid by the gun lobby to do that./----/ That's not the Progs end game and you know it.You'd still have the right to bear arms even if certain guns are banned. There's no mention of you being able to bear any weapon ever made.How about 500,000 people bearing their handguns, AR-15s, AK-47s, shotguns, and whatever other arms they legally own, marching through the streets of D.C. to demand that Congress preserve their rights? Maybe surround the Capitol building why they're at it. We need this to happen.
Btw, nice sock.
View attachment 185640
So you have nothing else. Got it.Writings on paper with a pen or even a pencil have been court approved as free speech already (within the usual limits of course), so you lose there. Writings on internet also have the same court declared protection of free speech (like I said, within the usual limits). Another loss.
Got anything else?
The courts don't "approve" methods.
And it wouldn't surprise me at all if those people with signs are paid by the gun lobby to do that.
So you have nothing else. Got it.Writings on paper with a pen or even a pencil have been court approved as free speech already (within the usual limits of course), so you lose there. Writings on internet also have the same court declared protection of free speech (like I said, within the usual limits). Another loss.
Got anything else?
The courts don't "approve" methods.
I know, shitty tactics on any side, that's just the way things go these days. Even The Beatles paid those girls to scream at them when they came to America the first time.And it wouldn't surprise me at all if those people with signs are paid by the gun lobby to do that.
And the same people paid MLK's granddaughter to stand in front of everyone and declare "I have a dream of a world without guns"? And the same people paid the entire crowd to erupt with cheers and applause?
Start by stopping to sell bullets. Eventually, most people will have no use for a wall-hanger.The dumb liberal crackpots just don't have the mental capacity to understand how hard it would be to ban and confiscate guns
Start by stopping to sell bullets. Eventually, most people will have no use for a wall-hanger.The dumb liberal crackpots just don't have the mental capacity to understand how hard it would be to ban and confiscate guns
/----/ That's not the Progs end game and you know it.You'd still have the right to bear arms even if certain guns are banned. There's no mention of you being able to bear any weapon ever made.How about 500,000 people bearing their handguns, AR-15s, AK-47s, shotguns, and whatever other arms they legally own, marching through the streets of D.C. to demand that Congress preserve their rights? Maybe surround the Capitol building why they're at it. We need this to happen.
Btw, nice sock.
View attachment 185640
How about 500,000 people bearing their handguns, AR-15s, AK-47s, shotguns, and whatever other arms they legally own, marching through the streets of D.C. to demand that Congress preserve their rights? Maybe surround the Capitol building why they're at it. We need this to happen.
That's not happening, despite a few people with signs. When Obummer was in charge, pretty much nothing was done/----/ That's not the Progs end game and you know it.You'd still have the right to bear arms even if certain guns are banned. There's no mention of you being able to bear any weapon ever made.How about 500,000 people bearing their handguns, AR-15s, AK-47s, shotguns, and whatever other arms they legally own, marching through the streets of D.C. to demand that Congress preserve their rights? Maybe surround the Capitol building why they're at it. We need this to happen.
Btw, nice sock.
View attachment 185640
