When will the stock bubble burst?

When will the stock bubble burst ?

  • 2016 - Q1

    Votes: 1 25.0%
  • 2016 - Q2

    Votes: 1 25.0%
  • 2016 - Q3

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2016 - Q4

    Votes: 1 25.0%
  • After 2017

    Votes: 1 25.0%

  • Total voters
    4

CultureCitizen

Silver Member
Jun 1, 2013
1,932
140
95
It seems to be a bit inflated, and now that the fed has risen rates, it has set the conditions for it to burst.
 
not until after the election

the fed will spend our money to keep it going at least until then

if a rep wins, it will fall apart the next Q
if a dem wins the debt will skyrocket to keep it afloat
 
The Pubs set the standard for borrowing.

The Dems try to tax.
Damn Fakey that is one of your dumbest posts ever. Apparently you are unaware of what the past few years has done to the national debt. Get informed before posting.
You truly don't get it. Both parties are responsible for it, and the libertarians have no answer for it. Grow up, kid. Gipper Austerity Pimp speaks up: the GAP.
 
The Pubs set the standard for borrowing.

The Dems try to tax.
Damn Fakey that is one of your dumbest posts ever. Apparently you are unaware of what the past few years has done to the national debt. Get informed before posting.
You truly don't get it. Both parties are responsible for it, and the libertarians have no answer for it. Grow up, kid.
Yet you think pubs borrow and dems don't.

Can you prove that ridiculous statement?
 
The Pubs set the standard for borrowing.

The Dems try to tax.
Damn Fakey that is one of your dumbest posts ever. Apparently you are unaware of what the past few years has done to the national debt. Get informed before posting.
You truly don't get it. Both parties are responsible for it, and the libertarians have no answer for it. Grow up, kid.
Yet you think pubs borrow and dems don't. Can you prove that ridiculous statement?
They borrow if they have to, sure, if they can't tax. They like the Pubs are responsible for the debt. The libertarians have no answer. You are the GAP in American thinking.
 
The Pubs set the standard for borrowing.

The Dems try to tax.
Damn Fakey that is one of your dumbest posts ever. Apparently you are unaware of what the past few years has done to the national debt. Get informed before posting.
You truly don't get it. Both parties are responsible for it, and the libertarians have no answer for it. Grow up, kid.
Yet you think pubs borrow and dems don't. Can you prove that ridiculous statement?
They borrow if they have to, sure, if they can't tax. They like the Pubs are responsible for the debt. The libertarians have no answer. You are the GAP in American thinking.
So...Obama did not borrow in his effort to double the national debt. He increased taxes. Nothing is further from the truth.

Libertarians do have the answer and it has been clearly stated for decades, but due to your mental illness you have refused to accept it.
 
We're badly, badly overdue for a nice, big correction.

I'd love to see 18% to 20%, but don't be surprised to see 25% to 28%. This has taken too long.

The Fed's actions were irrelevant. Yields are down, and there are at LEAST as many deflationary pressures at this moment than inflationary pressures.
.
 
Last edited:
There will be a correction, yes.

gipper is falsifying again. Dems tax if they can, both parties will borrow. The libertarians don't have a clue how to run anything including the country club.
 
The Pubs set the standard for borrowing.

The Dems try to tax.
Damn Fakey that is one of your dumbest posts ever. Apparently you are unaware of what the past few years has done to the national debt. Get informed before posting.
You truly don't get it. Both parties are responsible for it, and the libertarians have no answer for it. Grow up, kid.
Yet you think pubs borrow and dems don't. Can you prove that ridiculous statement?
They borrow if they have to, sure, if they can't tax. They like the Pubs are responsible for the debt. The libertarians have no answer. You are the GAP in American thinking.
Damn Fakey that post is dumber than your first one.

I get it....it is okay for D's to borrow, but not Rs. How does one get so dumb? It must be difficult.
 
We're badly, badly overdue for a nice, big correction.

I'd love to see 18% to 20%, but don't be surprised to see 25% to 28%. This has taken too long.

The Fed's actions were irrelevant. Yields are down, and there are at LEAST as many deflationary pressures at this moment than inflationary pressures.
.
I think your 25 to 28 is a lot closer to truth. And you are right about the Fed. I think it will be 16/q4 and 17/q1 where we finally see it. Because that is where our interest on loans FROM China go up.
 
There is currently no stock market bubble…
Any links to support your claim ?

There is a simple definition of what constitutes a stock/stock market bubble, which entails the demand for stocks have driven stock prices higher, and there is no reasonable correlation between current stock prices and their long-term valuations.

Stocks are expensive, but there isn't a bubble.
 
The Pubs set the standard for borrowing.

The Dems try to tax.
Damn Fakey that is one of your dumbest posts ever. Apparently you are unaware of what the past few years has done to the national debt. Get informed before posting.
You truly don't get it. Both parties are responsible for it, and the libertarians have no answer for it. Grow up, kid.
Yet you think pubs borrow and dems don't. Can you prove that ridiculous statement?
They borrow if they have to, sure, if they can't tax. They like the Pubs are responsible for the debt. The libertarians have no answer. You are the GAP in American thinking.
Damn Fakey that post is dumber than your first one.

I get it....it is okay for D's to borrow, but not Rs. How does one get so dumb? It must be difficult.
Yeah, you got your argument broke off in you, and you are squealing.
 
It seems to be a bit inflated, and now that the fed has risen rates, it has set the conditions for it to burst.

dear, a bit inflated would not be a bubble about to burst. Please think before you post.

The S&P 500 begins the new year with a price/earnings (P/E) multiple of about 18 times trailing 12-month earnings per share. This represents a valuation higher than about 74% of the time since 1945. While a relatively high valuation, it remains far below its post-war record of more than 30 times earnings in early 2000, and as recently as the 1990s, the stock market delivered nice returns from valuation levels at or above today’s P/E multiple.
 
Baiamonte stopped thinking a long time ago.

There is no bubble.
 
Last edited:
There is currently no stock market bubble…
Any links to support your claim ?

There is a simple definition of what constitutes a stock/stock market bubble, which entails the demand for stocks have driven stock prices higher, and there is no reasonable correlation between current stock prices and their long-term valuations.

Stocks are expensive, but there isn't a bubble.
Ah , I guess such a comment comming from someone whose avatar is named hedge-ology should be taken with a grain of salt.
Indeed, stock prices are a lot higher than their valuation, so , it is a bubble.

122915_Buffet_Indicator_Flashes_Amber.jpg

Stock Market Capitalization To GDP Ratio Definition | Investopedia
 

Forum List

Back
Top