thereisnospoon
Gold Member
Dream on.....France calls you....Expect to be on strike for half the year. Which should suit you just fine. Being paid for doing nothing except be a big pain in the ass.Strong worker organization, look into anarchist syndicalism. Yeah, refer to the point on feudalism in my signature, that's all I say to your shit."Seize"? With what? Go ahead. State it......You want to..It does matter, in my view, sorry. If it comes to a point where the workers finally seize production, and their is a factory producing completely useless luxuries, it will more then likely be taken to produce something useful. How are you judging if you're good anyways? You'll be compensated based on your labor and productivity, and anyways, the production would be collectively owned, so your argument doesn't have relevance to socialism.It does matter, if you produce food, you're amount of production is obviously important. I don't know, that's why the core idea of anarchism/communism is to pay laborers based on what they produce/the labor they give, or help them when they can't work. I'm sure you're better then most, (Yeah, ok) let's assume billions, as you use "most"What does it matter what I produce? I produce work that yields goods and services that are needed by the public, in a cost effective manner. I am very good at my job. I am better than most. I accomplish more than most.
So please, answer my question. "Should" I produce more than others, without regard to what I am compensated?
You're wrong, it does not matter what I produce. But for argument's sake, let's go with food. Let's say I produce food, and I happen to be very good a producing food. "Should" I produce more food than most, regardless of what my compensation will be, so that it can be spread amongst other people who need it?
Look, the more you bitch, the less power you have.
You don't deserve a job. You are a cancer.