Cammmpbell
Senior Member
- Sep 13, 2011
- 5,095
- 519
- 48
................in the form of tax cuts and ruined the PATCO union was that the beginning of the end for our middle class?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Reagan never gave borrowed money to the wealthy. Negged for lying.
Do you even understand how the tax system works?................in the form of tax cuts and ruined the PATCO union was that the beginning of the end for our middle class?
Reagan never gave borrowed money to the wealthy. Negged for lying.
Do you even understand how the tax system works?................in the form of tax cuts and ruined the PATCO union was that the beginning of the end for our middle class?
Allowing someone to keep more their money is not giving borrowed money to them......
Reagan never gave borrowed money to the wealthy. Negged for lying.
Your naivity is overwhelming. He gave tax cuts to the wealthy and began to quadruple the national debt. Borrowing and funneling the money to the wealthy is exactly what he did.
You can't cut your income and spend more at the same time. That shit just won't work. Do you run your personal business that way? If you do you are a fool.
Reagan never gave borrowed money to the wealthy. Negged for lying.
In fact, there is a sound mathematical argument that Reagan's policies did exactly that.
1. The deficits did increase dramatically during the Reagan presidency, so borrowing more money during the Reagan presidency is a fact.
2. The effective federal tax rate on the top 1% was about 35% in 1980. It had fallen to about 30% by 1988, so real tax savings for the wealthiest Americans during the Reagan presidency is also a fact.
If, therefore, the wealthy paid lower taxes during the Reagan presidency, but the government fell short of the revenue it needed during the same period, and thus had to borrow,
it is mathematically sound to say that the government borrowed money to give to the wealthy when Reagan was president.
Reagan never gave borrowed money to the wealthy. Negged for lying.
In fact, there is a sound mathematical argument that Reagan's policies did exactly that.
1. The deficits did increase dramatically during the Reagan presidency, so borrowing more money during the Reagan presidency is a fact.
2. The effective federal tax rate on the top 1% was about 35% in 1980. It had fallen to about 30% by 1988, so real tax savings for the wealthiest Americans during the Reagan presidency is also a fact.
If, therefore, the wealthy paid lower taxes during the Reagan presidency, but the government fell short of the revenue it needed during the same period, and thus had to borrow,
it is mathematically sound to say that the government borrowed money to give to the wealthy when Reagan was president.
No, it isn't mathematically sound. He didn't give the wealthy anything. It was theirs to begin with. He just stole less of it and those tax cuts didn't lessen federal "income." Revenue to the federal government increased radically during the 1980s, but Reagan jacked up spending far beyond the increase and that's the same mistake Bush 43 made.
And as I told our village idiot OP, unless you're pledging to vote out Obama I don't want to hear a peep out of you about deficit spending because NO president before him ever ran up trillion dollar deficits in one year. You people have NO credibility on this topic.
Reagan never gave borrowed money to the wealthy. Negged for lying.
Your naivity is overwhelming. He gave tax cuts to the wealthy and began to quadruple the national debt. Borrowing and funneling the money to the wealthy is exactly what he did.
Naivity isn't a word. My money doesn't belong to the government, you Marxist pig. Every penny I earn is MINE and when the government cuts taxes that's just less they are stealing from me and everyone else to buy votes from jealous parasites like you.
You can't cut your income and spend more at the same time. That shit just won't work. Do you run your personal business that way? If you do you are a fool.
No shit, Sherlock, yet you support Obama who has done exactly that so shut the fuck up. You have no credibility.
................in the form of tax cuts and ruined the PATCO union was that the beginning of the end for our middle class?
................in the form of tax cuts and ruined the PATCO union was that the beginning of the end for our middle class?
In fact, there is a sound mathematical argument that Reagan's policies did exactly that.
1. The deficits did increase dramatically during the Reagan presidency, so borrowing more money during the Reagan presidency is a fact.
2. The effective federal tax rate on the top 1% was about 35% in 1980. It had fallen to about 30% by 1988, so real tax savings for the wealthiest Americans during the Reagan presidency is also a fact.
If, therefore, the wealthy paid lower taxes during the Reagan presidency, but the government fell short of the revenue it needed during the same period, and thus had to borrow,
it is mathematically sound to say that the government borrowed money to give to the wealthy when Reagan was president.
No, it isn't mathematically sound. He didn't give the wealthy anything. It was theirs to begin with. He just stole less of it and those tax cuts didn't lessen federal "income." Revenue to the federal government increased radically during the 1980s, but Reagan jacked up spending far beyond the increase and that's the same mistake Bush 43 made.
And as I told our village idiot OP, unless you're pledging to vote out Obama I don't want to hear a peep out of you about deficit spending because NO president before him ever ran up trillion dollar deficits in one year. You people have NO credibility on this topic.
If you don't understand math, I guess it's futile to try to carry on a conversation about math with you.
Your naivity is overwhelming. He gave tax cuts to the wealthy and began to quadruple the national debt. Borrowing and funneling the money to the wealthy is exactly what he did.
Naivity isn't a word. My money doesn't belong to the government, you Marxist pig. Every penny I earn is MINE and when the government cuts taxes that's just less they are stealing from me and everyone else to buy votes from jealous parasites like you.
You can't cut your income and spend more at the same time. That shit just won't work. Do you run your personal business that way? If you do you are a fool.
No shit, Sherlock, yet you support Obama who has done exactly that so shut the fuck up. You have no credibility.
You're an anarchist. That's rather demented.
Reagan never gave borrowed money to the wealthy. Negged for lying.
Your naivity is overwhelming. He gave tax cuts to the wealthy and began to quadruple the national debt. Borrowing and funneling the money to the wealthy is exactly what he did.
Bill Clinton came along, raised taxes and straightened things out and then old dumbassed George Bush cut taxes twice, started two wars and doubled the national debt again. You can't cut your income and spend more at the same time. That shit just won't work. Do you run your personal business that way? If you do you are a fool.
It amazes me that so many people think that the government is "giving" money to a taxpayer when they're lowering their tax rates or keeping them low. Have we not yet learned that it's not the government's money to "give"? That arranging for a person to keep more of what they have earned is not "giving" them anything?