Thinker1st
Rookie
- Jan 13, 2013
- 11
- 1
- 1
If the country were divided into sections, one for Liberals and for Conservatives, which one would you call home and why?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If the country were divided into sections, one for Liberals and for Conservatives, which one would you call home and why?
It's silly, within a generation any population of humans will find something to divide themselves into factions and be back at square one. A society is much more stable when they do not willingly create artificial divisions. It is also very likely that any concentration of militaristic conservatives will still fear and scapegoat a neighboring liberal nation and take every step to undermine or even annihilate them.
My way is keeping things pretty much as is while there are numerous amendment campaigns on the right that are looking to change practically every part of the document so maybe you need to walk back that statement somewhat.It's silly, within a generation any population of humans will find something to divide themselves into factions and be back at square one. A society is much more stable when they do not willingly create artificial divisions. It is also very likely that any concentration of militaristic conservatives will still fear and scapegoat a neighboring liberal nation and take every step to undermine or even annihilate them.
Indeed silly.
Removing aritifcial divisions is easy if we just do it your way and not cling to a dated Constitution.
It's silly, within a generation any population of humans will find something to divide themselves into factions and be back at square one. A society is much more stable when they do not willingly create artificial divisions. It is also very likely that any concentration of militaristic conservatives will still fear and scapegoat a neighboring liberal nation and take every step to undermine or even annihilate them.
If the country were divided into sections, one for Liberals and for Conservatives, which one would you call home and why?
It's silly, within a generation any population of humans will find something to divide themselves into factions and be back at square one. A society is much more stable when they do not willingly create artificial divisions. It is also very likely that any concentration of militaristic conservatives will still fear and scapegoat a neighboring liberal nation and take every step to undermine or even annihilate them.
Undermining liberalism is the best was of annihilating them. Fortunately, liberals are cooperative. Abort their children, addict them to drugs and debase their currency. No enemy could think up how to subvert liberals with the same art liberals have done for themselves.
Mankind will always be at endless warfare, don't you know that by now? There will always be people who want to be free and people who want to subjugate them. There will always be nations that want to assert their power over other, weaker, nations. The liberal answer is to make the US so weak that we just aren't worth fighting. No one wants to particularly go to war with Paraguay. We can avoid war by instantly surrendering to whoever comes along.
Mankind will always be at endless warfare, don't you know that by now? There will always be people who want to be free and people who want to subjugate them. There will always be nations that want to assert their power over other, weaker, nations. The liberal answer is to make the US so weak that we just aren't worth fighting. No one wants to particularly go to war with Paraguay. We can avoid war by instantly surrendering to whoever comes along.
Idiotic. No one is seeking to make America militarily weak, no one. Just because our president is not threatening to wipe out third world counties every day of the week does not mean we are weak, it means we are responsibly using our still terribly oversized and expensive military responsibly and not risking our personnel on useless adventures.
Mankind will always be at endless warfare, don't you know that by now? There will always be people who want to be free and people who want to subjugate them. There will always be nations that want to assert their power over other, weaker, nations. The liberal answer is to make the US so weak that we just aren't worth fighting. No one wants to particularly go to war with Paraguay. We can avoid war by instantly surrendering to whoever comes along.
Idiotic. No one is seeking to make America militarily weak, no one. Just because our president is not threatening to wipe out third world counties every day of the week does not mean we are weak, it means we are responsibly using our still terribly oversized and expensive military responsibly and not risking our personnel on useless adventures.
Really??
Our president is quite happy engaging and wiping third world nations off the map. He does it a different way - more bombs and less rebuilding after but we are still very much at war all over the world.
When will the people wake up and realize that democrats are no different than republicans when it comes to flexing our international military muscle? Constant war has become the norm and all the atrocities that follow it. It is not a good thing.